2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Which would you rather have?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-02, 02:04 PM
  #1  
Buckler of Swashes

Thread Starter
 
Ardent_Psyclone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which would you rather have?

An FC with a N/A 20B or a TII slightly modded?

Would it be more expensive to convert a N/A to turbo using the TII driveline or swapping in a 20B?
Old 07-16-02, 02:09 PM
  #2  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
I'd rather have the 20B. Yes, it would be considerably more expensive and difficult to install the 20B.
Old 07-16-02, 02:13 PM
  #3  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Re: Which would you rather have?

Originally posted by Ardent_Psyclone
An FC with a N/A 20B or a TII slightly modded?

Would it be more expensive to convert a N/A to turbo using the TII driveline or swapping in a 20B?
Why would anyone install an N/A 20B? You'd have to want to change out the rotors to higher compression, meaning a rebuild is required, and the engine already comes with a turbo system attached!!

Regardless, N/A or Turbo'd, a 20B is DEFINITELY more expensive. If you can't do a N/A to Turbo swap for less than $15K, you've done sometyhing wrong.
Old 07-16-02, 02:15 PM
  #4  
Rotor Head

 
DC350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh, yes. I've seen a rx7 run an 8 quater mile. with a TT 20b
Old 07-16-02, 02:25 PM
  #5  
Buckler of Swashes

Thread Starter
 
Ardent_Psyclone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: Which would you rather have?

Originally posted by scathcart


Why would anyone install an N/A 20B?
I suppose the question should have been:

Would you choose a normally aspirated engine over a pressurized one? similar power outputs, with the N/A being the more expensive option.
Old 07-16-02, 03:14 PM
  #6  
Banned

 
95R2-89TII Ground Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That's a good question, but I would have to say the 20B....serious room for improvement.
Old 07-16-02, 03:25 PM
  #7  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
OK, I've been through most of this already. I didn't always make the right choices, but I have learned from my mistakes as well as my success. Here's my opinion based on my experiences:

1) Start with a TII. If you have an NA, then sell it and buy a TII. If your NA just has too many mods to part with, then buy a TII with a blown engine and swap out ALL the suspension, brake, and driveline parts, along with a rebuilt or otherwise decent TII engine. The "NA to TII" conversion is not very smart 90% of the time, but there are exceptions.
2) Don't bother with a FCD, intake or exhaust yet; just go to the next step.
3) Once you have about $2K saved up, add an aftermarket EMS, high-flow fuel pump (Aeromotive or SX "1000hp models"), SX fuel pressure regulator, high-flow fuel filter, upgraded fuel lines, and aftermarket boost gauge. Now you don't need that $100 FCD, and you can safely add whatever intake and exhaust components you like as long as you watch your boost gauge and air-fuel ratio on the EMS.
4) As time and money permits, slowly upgrade your car. Add a huge front-mount intercooler, competition radiator, and the best electric fan(s) you can find. When the clutch wears out, replace it with a 2-disk clutch. Note that the current aftermarket front swaybars will not work with a 20B, so either pass on this upgrade or make a custom bar. Hopefully a production 20B-friendly swaybar will be offered to the public one day.
5) Once you have completed everything in #3 & 4, and you have about $6K saved up, then install a STOCK-turbo 20B-REW.
6) Once everything is running well with the stock-turbo 20B-REW, then you can spend the $10-15K or so converting to a big single turbo or a fire-breathing NA. I suggest the single turbo unless you want to race in a category (GT for example) in which turbos are not allowed.

Bottom line: Go for the TII, and then convert to a 20B at a later time if you like.
Old 07-16-02, 03:31 PM
  #8  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally posted by scathcart
Why would anyone install an N/A 20B? You'd have to want to change out the rotors to higher compression, meaning a rebuild is required, and the engine already comes with a turbo system attached!!

Regardless, N/A or Turbo'd, a 20B is DEFINITELY more expensive. If you can't do a N/A to Turbo swap for less than $15K, you've done sometyhing wrong.
Agreed, except that the stock 9.0:1 20B rotors are just fine for use in NA form. However, if you want to get a lot of power out of an NA 20B, you will need to run it at higher rpms, which means lightened rotors, porting, dry sump, etc., which would require a rebuild.

Originally posted by Ardent_Psyclone
I suppose the question should have been:

Would you choose a normally aspirated engine over a pressurized one? similar power outputs, with the N/A being the more expensive option.
The price depends on how you do them, but yes, the NA conversion would be more expensive given the same hp levels. While their outputs may be similar at lower levels, their max outputs are NOT similar. A maxed-out 20B NA is around 475hp (75hp less than Pettit's street-legal stock-turbo street port 20B LOL), while a maxed-out turbocharged 20B can make over 1000hp.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 AM.