2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

wideband help :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 09:31 PM
  #1  
osiris7442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: PA
wideband help :(

basically I have to give up on my bigger and better plans and keep my turbo stock till I can save up some significant money for a number of other things.

anyhoo Im shopping for a wideband that I can use until I can afford to go with the full haltech e8 setup.

basically I need it to be able to feed the stock ECU as well as a guage in the cabin, and if possibly have an alarm function for minimum/max afr so I don thave to stare at the guage constantly

any fingers in the right direction would be fabulas thanks

for reference what my setup will be
large street port
walbro, KG rails/-6an lines, 720 secondaries
RB revII exhaust
FCD
think thats the important stuff



oo second question
can after market boost guages be connected to the stock Ecu for a signal, or do they require their own boost sensor?

Last edited by osiris7442; Mar 11, 2007 at 09:33 PM. Reason: im dumb
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 09:34 PM
  #2  
SpooledupRacing's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Comstock Park, MI 49321
just go with the AEM wideband kit.. this way u can look at the lights quickly and know where u are..

295.00 shipped from me!
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #3  
MDD0101's Avatar
slowmotion
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: Hamden, Ct
i was gonna say the same
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2007 | 09:40 PM
  #4  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
**** AEM widebands, truly. my only experience with them led me to believe they are useless for most rotary engine tuning. why? because the unit i worked with only went to 11:1 before being useless, sub 11:1 is where you should be starting your tune on a rotary not working your way down to it... hopefully not all of their widebands are this way but i was disappointed when trying to work with this particular new model.

i suggest an LC1 innovate wideband, it can also emulate a narrowband input that you can wire into your stock ECU to retain closed loop operation and for those standalones that still use the outdated narrowband input for datalogging purposes without need to reconfigure the EMS or run a seperate datalog for AFRs.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 01:17 AM
  #5  
Penguin Racecar's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Calgary
I have a PLX M300. It's got a narrowband and wideband output so you can hook directly to your ECU. He Innovative LC-1 is nice if you want something fancy looking.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 03:47 AM
  #6  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by osiris7442
I need it to be able to feed the stock ECU as well as a guage in the cabin...
You don't need it to send a signal to the ECU. You leave the stock sensor to do that, and add a wideband sensor downstream, usually at the bottom of the downpipe to protect it from excessive exhaust temps.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 04:56 AM
  #7  
airworks-fc3s's Avatar
pistons go home!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: switzerland
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
You don't need it to send a signal to the ECU. You leave the stock sensor to do that, and add a wideband sensor downstream, usually at the bottom of the downpipe to protect it from excessive exhaust temps.
i got an AEM one and will on the one hand monitor the afr's with the wideband output and on the other hand connect the narrowband output to the wire of the stock sensor, so the stocker can be taken away! i think that should ork fine.

as far as the position of the sensor is concerned: i was worried that the extremely high exhaust temps of the 13b would kill my sensor so i'm actually tryin' to mount it as far awy from the turbo as possible! do you think 20inches down the pipe is safe enough??
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 06:45 AM
  #8  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
If the stock one is there, and works, why do anything to it?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 09:04 AM
  #9  
airworks-fc3s's Avatar
pistons go home!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: switzerland
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
If the stock one is there, and works, why do anything to it?
'cause i'm doing 3" exhaust, so the flanche for the stock sensor is no more available (plus the wire for the stock sensor is torn)!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 09:39 AM
  #10  
osiris7442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: PA
thanks for all the imput guys
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #11  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Originally Posted by airworks-fc3s
i got an AEM one and will on the one hand monitor the afr's with the wideband output and on the other hand connect the narrowband output to the wire of the stock sensor, so the stocker can be taken away! i think that should ork fine.

as far as the position of the sensor is concerned: i was worried that the extremely high exhaust temps of the 13b would kill my sensor so i'm actually tryin' to mount it as far awy from the turbo as possible! do you think 20inches down the pipe is safe enough??
You could always install a bung just prior to the mufflers. Your going to get the same reading as at the bottom of the downpipe and it's much cooler there. You can run the harness up thru the cover over the fuel pump for ease of installation.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #12  
sirshan's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Innovate LC1 w/ XD16 Gauge - only way to go. Has been accurate and is still successfully in use.

I did a lot of research before purchasing this too. PLX and Innovate seem to be the popular good ones. People with AEM always had some sort of complaint about readings or something of that sort.

I went LC1 with the gauge and definitely recommend it for anyone wanting a good accurate well made device.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 03:38 AM
  #13  
airworks-fc3s's Avatar
pistons go home!
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: switzerland
Originally Posted by HAILERS
You could always install a bung just prior to the mufflers. Your going to get the same reading as at the bottom of the downpipe and it's much cooler there. You can run the harness up thru the cover over the fuel pump for ease of installation.
that would be a good idea, unfortunately i'm using a sport-catalyzer to prevent being busted by the swiss police
so i think that cat would falsify the readings of the sensor. i'll have to put the senor right before the cat (approx. 20 inches from the turbo)! hope that is far enough...
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #14  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Originally Posted by airworks-fc3s
that would be a good idea, unfortunately i'm using a sport-catalyzer to prevent being busted by the swiss police
so i think that cat would falsify the readings of the sensor. i'll have to put the senor right before the cat (approx. 20 inches from the turbo)! hope that is far enough...
My bad. I should have mentioned no catalytic converter allowed if done that way. I've located the sensor in several places. One was just prior to the left muffler, one time in the stock position and later welded a bung inches from where the Racing Beat downpipe meets the next connection (cat or pre-silencer, depending on circumstances).

I used a NTK L1L3 sensor with a TechEdge version 1.1 wideband and have NEVER had a failure using that sensor, even when it was located in the stock 02 positon. Unfortunaltly TechEdge now uses other sensors than the NTK these days with their units.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #15  
classicauto's Avatar
Crash Auto?Fix Auto.
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7,831
Likes: 2
From: Hagersville Ontario
Originally Posted by Karack
**** AEM widebands, truly. my only experience with them led me to believe they are useless for most rotary engine tuning. why? because the unit i worked with only went to 11:1 before being useless, sub 11:1 is where you should be starting your tune on a rotary not working your way down to it... hopefully not all of their widebands are this way but i was disappointed when trying to work with this particular new model.

i suggest an LC1 innovate wideband, it can also emulate a narrowband input that you can wire into your stock ECU to retain closed loop operation and for those standalones that still use the outdated narrowband input for datalogging purposes without need to reconfigure the EMS or run a seperate datalog for AFRs.
really? huh...must've been a bad unit
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 09:29 AM
  #16  
J-Rat's Avatar
Alcohol Fueled!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,093
Likes: 2
From: Hood River oregon
Originally Posted by Karack
**** AEM widebands, truly. my only experience with them led me to believe they are useless for most
+1!!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mulcryant
General Rotary Tech Support
5
Oct 4, 2015 12:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49 PM.