2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

why the dash of 89+ weight more?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-01, 12:38 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Ben L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why the dash of 89+ weight more?

does anyone know why or what makes the dash of 89+ Rx7 weight more than 86-88? I been told 89+'s dash weight 30 lbs more. I don't like the idea of extra weight so high up front.
thanks

Ben L
looking for 89gtus!
Old 09-26-01, 12:37 PM
  #2  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
The drivers side sub frame is oval tubed, (instead of stamped steel of the 86-88) and there is a lower brace between the center console and passengers side that was not there on the pre-88 models.

The upper assembly also is slightly different with modifications to support an airbag assembly. (Mazda was orginally gonna put in the airbag on all 89 and later models to meet the Fed passive restraint requirements, but then put mouse belts in instead on the coupes to save cost).

The center console subframe also got some minor modifications but, nothing that I can see that would add too much weight.
Old 09-26-01, 03:59 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
t_mak@mail.plymouth.edu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Norwich CT
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that why we have more leg room on the 86-88 than 89-91?

Also the carpetuing seems to be thicker
Old 09-26-01, 04:38 PM
  #4  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Carpeting actually got thicker/nicer in 88.

The doors internal sheet metal also got revised in 88, but externally you couldn't tell... you would have to pull a door panel to see.

There shouldn't be any differnence in leg room except on the passengers side if you had an auto tranny.
Old 09-27-01, 10:19 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Ben L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: why the dash of 89+ weight more?

"The drivers side sub frame is oval tubed, (instead of stamped steel of the 86-88) "
"there is a lower brace between the center console and passengers side that was not there on the pre-88 models"


Mark,
does that mean the 89+ are stiffer at the front end than 86/87? if it does do, I don't mind it at all, I think a FC needs all the stiffness it can offers.
I believed 89 GTUs should be a contender in the SCCA SoloII C-Stock class. it is my goal to prove that GTUs can take on N/a MR2s and 924s.
thanks Mark.

Ben L
92 mr2turbo,
and still looking for a GTUs.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MILOS7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
6
05-09-16 06:39 AM
Sh00bs
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
10-01-15 11:57 PM
vish86
Interior / Exterior / Audio
3
10-01-15 11:53 PM



Quick Reply: why the dash of 89+ weight more?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.