2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

what's the difference.... which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-10, 05:41 PM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
AKILEEZ_777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: CHARLOTTE, NC
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what's the difference.... which is better?

hi there to all of my fellow rotary comrades,

i have an '88 FC that has been sitting for about 4 years b'cuz the motor lost compression. i have finally gotten around to almost finish saving up some money to get it back on the road but during my reasearch i decided to go with a jdm 3rd gen or RD motor and trans swapwhich is all clear to me.

in the process of my search i came across a regular motor for the FD and a cosmo one which both have 2 rotors and twin turbos. i am not sure which one i should go with b'cus i do not know if one is better (durable) and/or faster than the other. and should i be worried that on one offers warrantied on these rotary jdm swap?

please help with explaination,
AKILEEZ_777.
Old 10-21-10, 07:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
durtled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: jordan ny
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well i would look into a s5 swap not a s6 main reason is u need to use all ur old sensors from the s4 on the motor unless ur running a standalone right out of the box. all rotarys are durable if u treat them right and do the required maintenance. so if u want to do the work u can put a s6 engine in it. personally i would go with a s5 from a 89-91 Tii. people are up and down about twin turbo and single turbo. twins are nice if they are working correctly but a single is a better long run bet.
Old 10-22-10, 05:40 PM
  #3  
oi oi oi

iTrader: (7)
 
john ward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: wilmot,oh
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Both the cosmo and fd are a very involved swap. If you search youll find alot of information. You should stay s4 unless you do alot of research and are up for the challenge.
Old 10-22-10, 05:54 PM
  #4  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
not
worth
the
few
hp
gained


13B cores are all capable of the same figures, the REW just has a better stock starting point.
Old 10-22-10, 05:57 PM
  #5  
T2 Duo!
iTrader: (6)
 
tuscanidream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: RI/CT
Posts: 1,665
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by durtled
well i would look into a s5 swap not a s6 main reason is u need to use all ur old sensors from the s4 on the motor unless ur running a standalone right out of the box. all rotarys are durable if u treat them right and do the required maintenance. so if u want to do the work u can put a s6 engine in it. personally i would go with a s5 from a 89-91 Tii. people are up and down about twin turbo and single turbo. twins are nice if they are working correctly but a single is a better long run bet.
S5 has an electronic omp where as the s4 is mechanical. An ecu swap would be required i believe. Im still a newbie so double check my info. But your better off staying with the S4 for ease of install.
Old 10-22-10, 07:06 PM
  #6  
89FC
 
-Crash-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Cali.
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Go S5 swap, the other two motors would require a standalone ecu, custom subframe, and more and more custom.
Old 10-22-10, 07:32 PM
  #7  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
I would stick with the S4 engine. It is usually cheaper, it will work with your current wiring, it has a simple mechanical OMP, and you have the option of using the stock intercooler and TII hood if you wish. The S4 block is good for 400rwhp with the bolt-on BNR Stage 4 turbo upgrade.
http://bnrsupercars.com/

See typical mods here:
http://fc3spro.com/TECH/FM2W/power.htm

Why the 13B-REW and 13B-RE are a pain:
http://fc3spro.com/TECH/SWAP/FD3S/rew.html
http://fc3spro.com/TECH/SWAP/COSMO/13b-re.html

BTW, the FD RX-7 owners with serious cars will almost always replace the twin turbos with a large single turbo, so don't overestimate the performance value of twin turbos.
Old 10-22-10, 07:57 PM
  #8  
s4 Pride

iTrader: (19)
 
TheAbsence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 3,350
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If you end up going s5, use the s4 front cover to keep the OMP. If you want to be different, go s6 or -RE but as everyone has stated, its a bit more work and you'll absolutely need a standalone.
Old 10-22-10, 08:03 PM
  #9  
mattg prob nt coming back

iTrader: (3)
 
FC3S_nataku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: OrangePark FL
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a 13bre is cakewalk compared to a 13brew swap
Old 10-22-10, 10:20 PM
  #10  
Listen to King Diamond.

iTrader: (4)
 
need RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 2,832
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
If you have to ask...

You have to do A LOT more research. Or drop your car and a big check off at a shop and let them handle it.
Old 10-23-10, 07:25 PM
  #11  
Authentic Made
 
Ignoramus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evil Aviator provided some good links for you. There's a lot of threads about the cosmo and the s6 swap, you just have to search. The s6 is the most extensive and difficult, but the cosmo isn't that easy either. If you do it right both swaps cost a pretty penny, even if you're doing the labor on your own. That means even more time of saving money and staring at your fc while it doesn't run. Like the others I would suggest sticking with the s4 or s5 tII motor. Much, much easier to do, and you'd be able to enjoy your car that much sooner.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
onefastrx712a
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
03-13-11 12:51 PM
twinturborx7pete
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
109
07-15-09 04:13 PM
fernquidy
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
03-10-08 04:36 AM
shift.
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
16
02-02-06 05:35 PM
shift.
1st Gen Archive
15
02-02-06 02:13 AM



Quick Reply: what's the difference.... which is better?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 AM.