2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

What octane to run???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2002 | 12:40 AM
  #26  
jreynish's Avatar
New Project on the Way...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 6
From: Yellowknife, NT
here in canada too we just go to the airport and fill up on avgas!!! lol
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 12:40 AM
  #27  
bcty's Avatar
Boost This!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo, B.C, Canada
in a 2nd gen n/a use regular 97 i believe and then premix!
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 12:43 AM
  #28  
Silkworm's Avatar
Has been.. hangin' around
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA
Bad idea on the Avgas if you have cats. No cats, then knock yourself out (just don't tell the EPA I said so )

PaulC
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 01:23 AM
  #29  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by Silkworm
Bad idea on the Avgas if you have cats. No cats, then knock yourself out (just don't tell the EPA I said so )

PaulC
Also bad for O2 sensors as I recall. Don't recommend this unless you have a heated 4-wire O2 sensor.
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 01:49 AM
  #30  
The Ace's Avatar
Greek Power
Tenured Member: 20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Greece
Re: Re: Re: Octane

Originally posted by Evil Aviator

Same with the turbo cars. If using the highest octane available in your turbocharged car makes you feel better, then go ahead, but in most cases it's a waste of money. I don't suppose that any of you TII owners have bothered to look up the octane requirements in your owner's manual?
Well, in the manual and on the gas tank cap it clearly says "95 Oct Fuel Only", so I guess this is the minimum...

I now put in 96Oct, but I used to use 98Oct, and I DID see a difference (might have been the different gas stations...)
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 02:19 AM
  #31  
Powridah's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Abbotsford, BC Canada
in my owners manual of my 87 TII it says use a 91 octane or higher fuel.
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 02:23 AM
  #32  
brap brap
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: Migrated back to Gulf Breeze, FL
Originally posted by bcty
in a 2nd gen n/a use regular 97 i believe and then premix!
no 87 - there's no such thing as 97, I think you meant 87

EDIT: I could be wrong about 97, but I never heard of 97...only 87, 90 ( I think) and 93.... hmmm
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 10:57 AM
  #33  
Forseti's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Well it definitely made a difference for my emissions, when I used 94 as opposed to 87. This means that the combustion in my engine is more complete.

Please explain to me why less complete combustion nets the same or more power than more complete combustion, because I am honestly curious to know.

Thank you,

/F/
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 12:31 PM
  #34  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by Powridah
in my owners manual of my 87 TII it says use a 91 octane or higher fuel.
Just to convert that value for the stupid Americans (LOL), 91 RON is roughly 87 PON, which is what you put in your S4 RX-7.

Originally posted by The Ace
Well, in the manual and on the gas tank cap it clearly says "95 Oct Fuel Only", so I guess this is the minimum...

I now put in 96Oct, but I used to use 98Oct, and I DID see a difference (might have been the different gas stations...)
Once again, for the lazy Americans, 95 RON is roughly 91 PON, which is what you put in your S5 RX-7.

Yes, the gas formula also has a lot to do with the power, however the octane rating in itself has absolutely no bearing on power, complete combustion, or any other magical powers. Aromatic additives will add to both power and octane rating, while iso-octane and other additives will raise the octane rating but reduce power. If that 98 octane had benzene in it, for example, you would have seen an increase in power. Unfortunately, the environmentally-conscious Americans will generally not allow aromatics in pump gas, so we are pretty much stuck with the power-reducing octane enhancers.

Originally posted by Forseti
Well it definitely made a difference for my emissions, when I used 94 as opposed to 87. This means that the combustion in my engine is more complete.

Please explain to me why less complete combustion nets the same or more power than more complete combustion, because I am honestly curious to know.

Thank you,

/F/
Please explain to me why you think that the higher octane gave you more complete combustion? I guess that what is difficult for people to understand is that octane is a desensitizer, which basically "waters down" the fuel so that it doesn't detonate as easily.
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/octane.htm
http://www.exxon.com/exxon_gas/index.html
Reply
Old May 31, 2002 | 12:53 PM
  #35  
AE Turbo's Avatar
Speed from skill
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Good info Evil Aviator.

Thinking back, most concrete evidence supports the idea that higer octane than reccomended does not improve performance. There seems to be a lot of Psychosematic evidence towards the opposite though.

I've been supporting the idea that higher octane than reccomended will not gain performance for quite some time. Then I was challenged by some psychosematic evidence the other day:

I ran out of gas in my Nissan Primera (SR20DE) on the freeway. I happened to have a 32 oz. can of "100 Octane Booster" in my car, so I just poured the whole thing into the tank hoping I could get to a gas station. I drove the car very lightly to get to a gas station, then I added 5 gallons of 91 fuel. When I left the gas station, I drove the car pretty hard and it drove noticeable smoother. I normally use 87 fuel. It's been two days now, and it seems to be driving quite nicely.

The only reason I doubt myself is that I have no concrete evidence to support the smoother feeling. Nor do I have a 100% understanding of the octane system and the effects on combustion. Someone offered an explanation of, "Yeah, they wouldn't have the higher octane available for no reason," but that's a pretty empty support.

I'm going to continue to research this until I can understand the process and number ratings fully. Thanks for the links!

Last edited by AE Turbo; May 31, 2002 at 01:20 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2002 | 02:46 AM
  #36  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally posted by AE Turbo
I ran out of gas in my Nissan Primera (SR20DE) on the freeway. I happened to have a 32 oz. can of "100 Octane Booster" in my car, so I just poured the whole thing into the tank hoping I could get to a gas station. I drove the car very lightly to get to a gas station, then I added 5 gallons of 91 fuel. When I left the gas station, I drove the car pretty hard and it drove noticeable smoother. I normally use 87 fuel. It's been two days now, and it seems to be driving quite nicely.
Aromatic additives are a whole different story than pump gas. Check out the MSDS sheet on "Go Go Octane Boost" (I love that name, LOL)
http://www.berrymanproducts.com/msds/1516.pdf

There's a lot of high-power suff in there that makes pump gas look pretty lame in comparison. There are many ways to increase the octane rating of a fuel. Most of the "boost in a bottle" additives use more powerful methods to increase the octane rating, as does racing fuel, while most pump gas uses methods which either maintain or reduce the power potential of the fuel. The bottom line is that the octane rating is an anti-detonation rating, and nothing more.

Confused yet?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2002 | 02:51 AM
  #37  
jspecracer7's Avatar
1JZ powered
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,423
Likes: 0
From: Where there's only two seasons, hot and wet! I love Okinawa
Re: Re: Re: Re: Octane

Originally posted by AE Turbo


Aren't those minimum requirements?

Seperate octane question: In Japan, they have higer octane fuel correct? So if you buy a J-Spec, shouldn't you have to use a higher octane fuel like 91 with a booster??
Okay, just because we HAVE higher octane does not mean we NEED to run higher ocatane. We also have 87 and 89 here too!
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2002 | 02:55 AM
  #38  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by christi


no 87 - there's no such thing as 97, I think you meant 87

EDIT: I could be wrong about 97, but I never heard of 97...only 87, 90 ( I think) and 93.... hmmm
I got a suggestion for your new sig: How about changing it to V6 mustangs and giving credit where credit is due? Any decent 5.0 or 4.6 will beat your listed cars.
You wouldn't respect a geo 3 cylinider saying "objects in mirror? those are NA RX-7's", so why should you be so blasphemous?

Where does all this hate for mustangs come from? Me thinks it is jealousy for their straightline power.

Me? I drive a killer car, but respect mustangs for what they are: Straight line cars. They were never meant to handle (solid rear axle, but Cobra IRS is a step in the right direction), but the perform wonderfully in the straight line.

Modified mustangs are about the only cars I am wary of, and I put 400+ to the tires when drag racing. You are not making near that much, so tell me your secret to keeping in front of them?

Sorry for the rant, but this ignorance and bigotry is pissing me off.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 10:46 AM
  #39  
Forseti's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Thanks

Thanks for the post evil Aviator.
That was more of the information I was looking for.

I made the assumption, that since my emissions were higher with 87, (especially the CO), and lower with 94, that the combustion is more complete, as there existed less incomplete products (CO, NO) during my emissions test. (don't know about CO2 NO2, SO2).

I think the key point is that using higher octane fuel that manual recommends won't give you power increase and it's in the formula of the gas.

So what does everyone here use/not use?

/F/
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2002 | 11:00 AM
  #40  
CrackHeadMel's Avatar
Learned alot | Alot to go
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,232
Likes: 0
From: Rotaryland, New Hampshire
Man, this might anger some people, i dont use it cus i got an n/a, but about 45 min south of me the gas stations sell 105 on the pumps,

everyone from southern nh on tehre way to NED buys ther gas along the way i suppose
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 10:14 PM
  #41  
RXHEVN's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: sydney australia
Suckers all of you

we can get avgas in australia, thats why real fuel is.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2003 | 01:29 AM
  #42  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Re: Suckers all of you

Originally posted by RXHEVN
we can get avgas in australia, thats why real fuel is.
Yes, too bad we "suckers" don't have any airplanes in our country, otherwise we could also get AVGAS just like you lucky people in Australia.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2003 | 06:50 AM
  #43  
Kenteth's Avatar
Like Ghandi with a gun
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,584
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, SD
Originally posted by relvinnian
We can get 100 unleaded here in Ohio
that "corn" gas?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2003 | 10:29 AM
  #44  
eViLRotor's Avatar
Brother of the Rotary
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 2
From: Arkham Asylum
I know Sunoco adds 10% ethanol to their gas to raise the octane rating of thier fuel, all the way to 94 for premium.

Is ethanol a power adding octane increaser, or does it also reduce power?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2003 | 10:38 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 1
From: NY,NY & ORLANDO, FL
how about an 91 n/a with 12 degrees of advanced timing? wouldnt that require more octane so it wont detotonate??
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2003 | 09:16 PM
  #46  
t.holzinger's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke Indiana
We used to put 6 to 8 unscented moth ball in 5 gal. of gas for drag racing. This didn;t leave any deposits on plugs or valves and 30 of them in 5 gal. could pop the head off a V8. In a 4 cyl. chevy prod. It raised MPG by 3 and they were a cheap boost. I haven't used them in my GTU yet. Older now not into that much speed.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #47  
got_boost's Avatar
R.E Amemiya
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 1
From: Montreal, Canada
Originally Posted by Silkworm
For some perspective, here in the People's Republik, we only get 91.

Yes, 91. Yes, tha'ts lower than the MID grade some of you get.

@#%*

PaulC
damn thats low 91 .... in Canada we have 94 and i think Shell has a 96.

or we can just stop at the airplane strip for personal planes and fill up with some 103 or 105 i think.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #48  
HoLsTeR's Avatar
Sleepy Drifter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis Park, MN
everyone thinks that NAs should use higher octaine for some reason. i dont understand why they come up with this idea. even heavy moded na rotaries dont need that high of octaine.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Jun 26, 2016 10:21 AM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Sep 14, 2015 07:50 PM
rx7brandon
General Rotary Tech Support
3
Aug 16, 2015 10:55 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 PM.