2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

turbo kit for n/a

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-10, 11:06 PM
  #26  
Senior Member

iTrader: (2)
 
alex91n/a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lynnwood, WA
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
another quick question. how low of boost can u run on a gt35r? can you run like 9 or 10? i assume you can. but im just wondering
Old 02-01-10, 11:28 PM
  #27  
Sequentially broken

 
ifryrice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You can run as low as your wastegate spring is set for, or as much as your wastegate can flow if it's undersized.
Old 02-01-10, 11:51 PM
  #28  
FD Daily

iTrader: (26)
 
K-Tune's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 3,308
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by bad 83
The engine broke a brand new 2 piece carbon apex seal at 2500 miles. It happens. If you want to talk smack. Keep it to yourself, instead of posting BS.
don't use carbon apex seals in boosted engines.
Old 02-02-10, 12:15 AM
  #29  
Former FC enthusiast

iTrader: (2)
 
KhanArtisT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,841
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bad 83
I am referring to boosting a stock unrebuilt engine. I build my own engines, and have turboed 9.4 and 9.7 engines. The most street hp and fun I have ever had was in a 4 port 9.4 engine running a GT35r at 15 psi. Guess what? The engine broke a brand new 2 piece carbon apex seal at 2500 miles. It happens. If you want to talk smack. Keep it to yourself, instead of posting BS.
LOL, and out of all the factors that can lead to a broken apex seal you somehow landed on compression? At 15 psi?

Don't blame the engine for your incompetence or mistakes and preach about it like someone else can learn something from it. Saying that 5psi is "pushing it" on a 9.7:1 engine is absurd and complete BS. I've driven my car for 10,000 miles+ at 5-6psi on a stock TII ECU with no tuning. I drive the **** out of the car too.
Old 02-02-10, 12:44 AM
  #30  
NASA geek

iTrader: (2)
 
RacerXtreme7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Carbon seals in a street engine? Pointless, pointless in anything other than a RACE engine that sees HIGH RPM (READ: 8500+ RPM) . They wear out extremely FAST, are light weight and don't seal for **** till they get high in RPM, and they do NOT like being boosted (they break easily with little detonation or extreme heat {READ: boosted applications}). They were specifically designed for race engines for several reasons, 1 being rotor housing friendly (this is why they wear out so quick), race engines are broken down frequently so replacing seals is no big deal, and re-using EXPENSIVE rotor housings was a must. 2 for extended high RPM operation (the reason they are so light weight, and because they are so light weight with weak spring tension not too mention 1 piece design they don't seal for **** until they are spinning 8500+ RPM).

Boosted high compression rotaries? Bad idea. YES they are used in some boosted race engines, yes some guys can get away with it on the street. But here's how they get away with it for extended periods of time, they have bullet proof fuel systems and high resolution aftermarket EMS systems and GREAT TUNING among MANY other tricks here and there such as correctly temperature ranged plugs. Yes there's a few shade tree mechanics in here that spout off about "I have XXXX miles on mine and no problems"..blah blah blah. I know Cocaine addicts that snort 8 ball after 8 ball for years and their not dead yet, so that must mean snorting cocaine night after night must be OK for your body right? Yes you can run high comp rotors in a boosted engine, but the margin of error is tini tiny. Even if you got tuning down and a bullet proof fuel system and safe guards such as knock detecting timing retard, all it'll take is ONE BAD TANK OF GAS or a really hot dry day (or even worse BOTH) that you didn't quite get those cell ranges tuned for those temperatures yet and your rebuilding again. At least with turbo rotors, the compression ranges allows a little room for error. A stock turbo engine with a stock turbo at reasonable boost can ping audibly loud for several hundred to several thousands of events and still survive. On a high compression turbo engine once you've heard it, it's probably too late. So why risk it? You want better off boost response then use a bigger exhaust. Fab a 3.5" system with several resonators and large mid and rear mufflers for none-ear bleeding decibel levels. You now have an extremely responsive turbo and a happy engine.

BTW, the above rant is aimed mainly at shade tree mechanics looking to run mid to high levels of boost (14~20+ psi) on larger then stock turbos (T04E to Gt35r / 60-1 sizes) or high boost (14+ psi) on small to mid sized turbos (stock to T3/T4's, To4b's, To4E's, Stock turbo hybrids etc.). High comp engines and low boost don't need all the safe guards and aftermarket gizmetry to work ok. A good example again of doing things right would be Arrons 6 port high comp GT40 engine were every aspect was well thought out and bullet proof.

Just my $0.02

~Mike..............
Old 02-02-10, 01:32 AM
  #31  
Sequentially broken

 
ifryrice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RacerXtreme7
Boosted high compression rotaries? Bad idea. YES they are used in some boosted race engines, yes some guys can get away with it on the street. But here's how they get away with it for extended periods of time, they have bullet proof fuel systems and high resolution aftermarket EMS systems and GREAT TUNING among MANY other tricks here and there such as correctly temperature ranged plugs. Yes there's a few shade tree mechanics in here that spout off about "I have XXXX miles on mine and no problems"..blah blah blah. I know Cocaine addicts that snort 8 ball after 8 ball for years and their not dead yet, so that must mean snorting cocaine night after night must be OK for your body right? Yes you can run high comp rotors in a boosted engine, but the margin of error is tini tiny. Even if you got tuning down and a bullet proof fuel system and safe guards such as knock detecting timing retard, all it'll take is ONE BAD TANK OF GAS or a really hot dry day (or even worse BOTH) that you didn't quite get those cell ranges tuned for those temperatures yet and your rebuilding again. At least with turbo rotors, the compression ranges allows a little room for error. A stock turbo engine with a stock turbo at reasonable boost can ping audibly loud for several hundred to several thousands of events and still survive. On a high compression turbo engine once you've heard it, it's probably too late. So why risk it? You want better off boost response then use a bigger exhaust. Fab a 3.5" system with several resonators and large mid and rear mufflers for none-ear bleeding decibel levels. You now have an extremely responsive turbo and a happy engine.

BTW, the above rant is aimed mainly at shade tree mechanics looking to run mid to high levels of boost (14~20+ psi) on larger then stock turbos (T04E to Gt35r / 60-1 sizes) or high boost (14+ psi) on small to mid sized turbos (stock to T3/T4's, To4b's, To4E's, Stock turbo hybrids etc.). High comp engines and low boost don't need all the safe guards and aftermarket gizmetry to work ok. A good example again of doing things right would be Arrons 6 port high comp GT40 engine were every aspect was well thought out and bullet proof.

Just my $0.02

~Mike..............
Very good points, the tuning and properly building for it can't be stressed enough. If people would do the research and know what they're getting into instead of just trying to make X horsepower with whatever they've got laying around there'd be a lot less dead engines out there. But hell, a lot of that applies even with low compression too. People have to think of those thing and make safeguards for it. AI is definitely the secret to removing almost all of those problems though. AI makes the reliability of high compression turbo cars damn near silly. People tend to ignore/overlook it, but just injecting water alone on your base tune goes a hell of a long way into protecting against those 'hot days' or 'bad gas' days. And since you're not tuned to make use of that added protection, you usually don't even run into a problem if your AI clogs/fails.

Still, I'd strongly discourage anybody who hasn't done the research/know what effects temperature rise play and the effect of moving that from the turbo compressor to the engine have from using high compression. Less room for error, but if you're prepared it can be managed pretty well.
Old 02-02-10, 02:40 PM
  #32  
Tango Down

iTrader: (3)
 
NoPistons!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: SC/NC
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
My writeup is a bit dated, but it serves its purpose well. That is the way to make a true "turbo-NA" and not a "6 port TII". By turbo-NA I mean using a minimum of stock TII parts and fabricating the stuff necessary to make the setup work. It is, however, not the way I would recommend most people go about it.

I'm going to update that writeup shortly to include the "6 port TII" method of just bolting on TII stuff. Honestly though, if a person is buying that much TII stuff to turbocharge the NA block, buy the TII block as well.

Doing a turbo NA is not a way to save money, as most people find out. They blow a few engines because they don't have the knowledge, skill, patience, experience and logic to do it properly. They take shortcuts. Building a turbo-NA is something to be done if the person enjoys fabrication, customization and playing around mechanically. Everyone else should just do a TII swap.

And seriously, to the original poster, check the FAQ before you post.
Reading is always good and i read project tina in entirety. Multiple times, just so i could figure out stuff, not replicate your setup. Some people fail to understand that because it's "the almost complete guide to turbocharging the na13b". That's not bad on your part, just the people without logic.


Turbo n/a IS a way to save money IF you dont want a TII of questionable condition. Picking and choosing EVERY part and knowing it's condition is cheaper than buying some bullshit that breaks on you the first time you hit boost b/c some packing peanuts fell into one of the exhaust ports/intake.

All in how you think about it.
Old 02-03-10, 04:09 PM
  #33  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JoeyFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere in PA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im going to run after market low comp rotors.
Old 02-04-10, 11:19 AM
  #34  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (2)
 
K!NCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,564
Received 25 Likes on 14 Posts
Where in PA are you from? I'm from Pittsburgh.
Old 02-04-10, 03:28 PM
  #35  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Originally Posted by KhanArtisT
And it may be the most "custom" way to boost the engine but not the easiest, most cost effective, safest, thermally efficient, responsive or the most reliable. That write-up scares people from boosting their NA cars because of the custom fabrication required and they end up junking it for some POS Jspec thats been sitting for 10 years. The knowledge, skill etc. can be compensated for by safeguards like less boost, more conservative tune, AI, higher octane, colder plugs, etc.
Those are interesting statements to make. I agree without a doubt that it is not the easiest, but I would like you to qualify saying that my setup was not thermally efficient, responsive or reliable because the fact is that it certainly was. I made more power for lower boost then a low compression 4 port with the same amount of fuel, so that is more thermally efficient. It was more response by far then a low compression 4 port block to the point where it was difficult to stay out of boost just cruising on the highway in 5th gear. As for reliability, I had no problems with the original setup save for splitting my rubber oil return line twice and that was my fault for making a stupid design decision.

I'm glad that my write up scares people! Most people should not be doing a turbo-NA project anyway. If they do choose to run boost on the NA engine, they should stick with a 6 port TII setup.

It is also important to note that my writeup was compiled 10 years ago and is the "Almost Complete Guide To...blah blah...".

I must be doing something right though, because I have never blown an engine. Not a 6 port turbo, not a 4 port turbo.

Buy Jspecs from reputable dealers and you don't have to worry about their condition.

People make such a big deal out of this. You can run as much boost as the type of fuel, AI, and tune on the car allows. People that do big builds throw in 9.7s just to be different and run 15psi+ with no AI. Stop listening to internet nerds that have never done a 6 port turbo.
In the same sense, it makes sense to worn people who are completely unfamiliar with what needs to be done that perhaps the path they are starting down is the wrong way to go. Just saying "Yeah, go ahead! It's easy!" is another blown engine and some wasted money. There are loads of threads here where people have done a turbo-NA or 6 port TII setup only to post back a few weeks later that their engine is blown.

Alex91: Buying an aftermarket turbo would be the best decision you make. Better boost control, response and overall power. Avoid buying a stock turbo at all costs.
Exactly. It is utterly pointless to go through all the work required for a turbo NA setup to only run an ancient stock turbo that has been considered a piece of junk for a lot of years. The only thing the stock turbo has going for it is that it bolts right up, and is cheap. But to bring the boost into the "fun" level brings the turbo out of it's efficiency range and turns it into a heat pump.

ok will do. i was just getting ready to start looking into different turbos when i came accross this thread. i have been looking into turbo maps to try and understand them. i want a smaller turbo so that its fun to just screw around, im not trying to build like a 300hp car. just something fairly quick.
GT3076R with a 1.06 turbine. 300HP and better response then the stock turbo.

Originally Posted by alex91n/a
Aaron Cake is running a Garrett GT40 (a pretty big beast) turbo on a bridgeport. I believe he is around 10-14psi of boost, and it's running fine.
13 PSI without the boost controller enabled and last dyno was 392 RWHP. 14 PSI with the controller on low (420 to the wheels) and 16 PSI with the controller on high (right around 500 HP at the wheels).

Then you have to think about what you are doing to cool the air charge from the turbo. Stock intercooler, front mount, water injection, methanol? Then what engine management are you using?
These are key questions. A decent sized intercooler and proper engine management are the most important. The effect of a big intercooler cannot be underestimated. On the dyno, at 13 PSI, my intake temps as measured in my plenum were just above ambient! Cooling like that is important, especially when using an inefficient turbo like the stock one. A larger turbo will run far cooler and make more power then a smaller one for the same boost level (generally speaking). Thus, one should upsize the turbo a bit when doing a high compression turbo NA setup.

Originally Posted by JoeyFC
im not going to get a t2 engine. ima build an n/a cuz of the higher com. faster pick up till boost hits in. i knw pretty much what i want to do just wanted to get an idea. i dnt need people telling me to just do a t2 swap.... *calming down* lol well i have owned a few rx7s. two were t2 and three n/a. im a tech at toyota love them to death but the 7 has always caught my eye. i want to build it and take pride in doing it. so thats y i wanted to knw if that himni racing kit would fit a n/a and what would need to be done to make it fit
Any aftermarket turbo kit for the TII will fit the NA engine if you use the TII upper and lower intake. This involves porting the TII lower to fit the NA block, which I believe has already been discussed in this thread.

Originally Posted by bad 83
I am referring to boosting a stock unrebuilt engine. I build my own engines, and have turboed 9.4 and 9.7 engines. The most street hp and fun I have ever had was in a 4 port 9.4 engine running a GT35r at 15 psi. Guess what? The engine broke a brand new 2 piece carbon apex seal at 2500 miles. It happens. If you want to talk smack. Keep it to yourself, instead of posting BS.
Running carbon apex seals, on a street engine, under boost? No wonder they broke. Carbon seals are for high RPM NA operation only.

A friend of mine had (until water froze and cracked the block this winter) a bone stock GSL-SE 6 port block running a China T4B making about 320HP for the past two years at 15 PSI or so. No issues. My original setup use my 6 port S4 NA block with 250,000K on the clock and ran a HT-18 at 8-12 PSI. No issues. Of course, I didn't put carbon apex seals into either engine.

Originally Posted by K-Tune
don't use carbon apex seals in boosted engines.
Or any sort of street car or any rotary that has to idle or operate at low RPMs...These are race seals only for NA use.

Originally Posted by NoPistons!
Reading is always good and i read project tina in entirety. Multiple times, just so i could figure out stuff, not replicate your setup. Some people fail to understand that because it's "the almost complete guide to turbocharging the na13b". That's not bad on your part, just the people without logic.
Bingo. And that I freely admit it is only one way of doing things, plus the write up is 10 years old. I'm going to be updating the NA-turbo guide with more options (like using TII intakes) soon.

Turbo n/a IS a way to save money IF you dont want a TII of questionable condition. Picking and choosing EVERY part and knowing it's condition is cheaper than buying some bullshit that breaks on you the first time you hit boost b/c some packing peanuts fell into one of the exhaust ports/intake.
All in how you think about it.
Basically. But regarding a TII in questionable condition, just be a bit proactive in how you shop and make sure you are buying good parts.

Originally Posted by JoeyFC
im going to run after market low comp rotors.
From where? There are only a handful of people machining rotors into low compression, and none of them are cheap. Just use the TII rotors if you want low compression.
Old 02-04-10, 06:06 PM
  #36  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
JoeyFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Somewhere in PA
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
racing beat makes nice rotors and yes the are a bit much for them.
Old 02-04-10, 07:06 PM
  #37  
The Big Ugly!

 
rotordad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well as far as low comp rotor there's no need to spend a pile of money on the Racing Beat assembly, I agree to just use the Turbo II rotors. Personally I use the 9.4:1 rotors in both my Supercharged car & my Turbocharged car. As said before keep your tune right & you should have no problems.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
02-26-21 10:12 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
02-26-19 02:04 AM
Turblown
Single Turbo RX-7's
0
08-14-15 04:48 PM



Quick Reply: turbo kit for n/a



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 AM.