TopGear 924S Vs. "New" RX-7
Lives on the Forum
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
You need to warn us if it needs a special player!
I wasted the 40M+ and was only able to LISTEN to it via WMP.
I've had bad experiences with DIVX players dumping stupid spyware **** on download, so I refuse to DL them onto my computer now.
-Ted
I wasted the 40M+ and was only able to LISTEN to it via WMP.
I've had bad experiences with DIVX players dumping stupid spyware **** on download, so I refuse to DL them onto my computer now.
-Ted
Thread Starter
Full Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Re: Re: TopGear 924S Vs. "New" RX-7
No problem guys, I'm happy you all enjoyed it. I'll probably loose my webspace now at SFU haha. I've far exceeded my bandwith usage for this semester already 
Why 1.8? I thought it was a direct 2:1 ratio because rotaries have double the combustions per RPM? Are the piston guys being nice because our engines are less efficient?
Originally posted by NZConvertible
The 2354cc figure comes from the 1.8 multiplication factor applied to rotaries in most racing formulas.
The 2354cc figure comes from the 1.8 multiplication factor applied to rotaries in most racing formulas.
I wish I was driving!
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Re: Re: Re: TopGear 924S Vs. "New" RX-7
Originally posted by Canadian Rotary Man
Why 1.8? I thought it was a direct 2:1 ratio because rotaries have double the combustions per RPM? Are the piston guys being nice because our engines are less efficient?
Why 1.8? I thought it was a direct 2:1 ratio because rotaries have double the combustions per RPM? Are the piston guys being nice because our engines are less efficient?
I know who you are!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
Mar 15, 2022 12:04 PM
alfred1976
RX-7 Audio/Visual Lounge
3
Dec 3, 2015 03:06 AM
