2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

top speed 112 on a turbo?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-04, 01:41 PM
  #101  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Madrx7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Madrx7racer
came back.........i had to.....now i'm off to bed again....send me the vid....still doesn't fit together how a RELATIVELY stock TII hit 180+ mph......it doesn't fit.....for ***** and giggles....take a pic of your engine bay....and please focus in on the turbo.......and just to be a dick about it can you use a 1/2 full glass of water with a lemon wedge and a straw going through the lemon.....please.
I said relatively stock when I talked about his car......
Madrx7racer is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 01:54 PM
  #102  
#1 Certified Cone Killer

 
PureSephiroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will host the vid. email it to

puresephiroth@nukegames.net

i'm excited to see this stupid argument die.
PureSephiroth is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 01:57 PM
  #103  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Madrx7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he can't! AOL won't send a file that big....
Madrx7racer is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 02:35 PM
  #104  
casio isn't here.

 
casio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by PureSephiroth
i'm excited to see this stupid argument die.
heh, its not that hard to simply not click on this thread. its funny that this stock geared, still heavy 249horse t2 can claim 185mph. i mean, i know someone with 500 to the ground. my goodness, with that sort of power he should be able to outrun that slow racing beat 244mph run.
casio is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 03:00 PM
  #105  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally posted by casio
heh, its not that hard to simply not click on this thread. its funny that this stock geared, still heavy 249horse t2 can claim 185mph. i mean, i know someone with 500 to the ground. my goodness, with that sort of power he should be able to outrun that slow racing beat 244mph run.
Boy, and I had to stick my nose in here...

It takes an exponential amount of horsepower to get the car over 100mph.
It's something about the 100mph speed level that allows aerodynamics to quickly kick on.

Almost any FC turbo with full exhaust and intake can bury the tach in 5th gear.
This is espeicially so for Zenki FC turbos with the shorter 5th gear, but it might be a little harder for Kouki FC turbos who have a taller 5th gear.
A Zenki FC turbo hits redline in 5th gear at around 165 - 170mph.
A Kouki FC turbo hits redline in 5th gear at around 180 - 185mph.
This is for US-Spec FC turbos only, as J-spec runs weird ratios in 5th and the rear end sometimes.

Now, getting over 200mph is no trivial matter.
If you think it was hard to get to 200mph, it's even harder to go past that!
If you think aero was important at slower speeds, aero will prevent you from getting killed at over 200mph.
I think the Racing Beat FC had over 600mph to hit the 244mph mark at Bonneville.
Add to that everything else was bulletproof.
We're talking special differential and transmission coolers, etc.

In Japan, the 300kph (about 186mph) club is not that exclusive.
Even a moderately modified FC turbo can hit those speeds, and it's just a matter of keeping the car on the ground - i.e. aero!
Going above 300kph is something better left for the pro's.
I've seen specially built "Wangan" (named after the infamous Tokyo expressway) cars, and these vehicle have budgets approaching US$100,000 if not more...


-Ted
RETed is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 03:15 PM
  #106  
casio isn't here.

 
casio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ted, your post seemed to say both things. i couldn't tell which side you were sticking with. heh. it sounds like you're saying someone with enough road could do this. i know i'm not trying anytime soon.
casio is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 03:21 PM
  #107  
#1 Certified Cone Killer

 
PureSephiroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Madrx7racer
he can't! AOL won't send a file that big....
whoops, I thought you meant over AIM or something
PureSephiroth is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 03:40 PM
  #108  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (7)
 
Sideways7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Temple, Texas (Central)
Posts: 6,596
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
One thing no one's asked yet is whether this was done on flat ground or not. I got my '93 626 with 120k miles on it up to almost 140 on the speedo, but it was on a very long downhill run.
Sideways7 is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 03:44 PM
  #109  
casio isn't here.

 
casio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was about to say "sorry, i live in texas. i dont think about hills much" but i see you're also in texas. i have no idea where killeen is. towards austin (from dfw) ?
anyways. thats quite a bit of downhill time i would think. at the rate of speed plus time it would take to reach 7300-7500 in 5th gear. i would be one freaked out passenger at that rate.
casio is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 03:47 PM
  #110  
Senior Member

iTrader: (-1)
 
87na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Phx, Arizona
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
www.aim.com get messanger and send it to me phatchorizo ill host it
87na is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 03:56 PM
  #111  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (7)
 
Sideways7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Temple, Texas (Central)
Posts: 6,596
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally posted by casio
i was about to say "sorry, i live in texas. i dont think about hills much" but i see you're also in texas. i have no idea where killeen is. towards austin (from dfw) ?
anyways. thats quite a bit of downhill time i would think. at the rate of speed plus time it would take to reach 7300-7500 in 5th gear. i would be one freaked out passenger at that rate.
Killeen is about 60 miles straight north of Austin, right tby Fort Hood. The hills I was talking about were on Highway 6 north of College Station. I maxed out my 626 coming back from Houston at about 4 AM. It didn't take too long in that car, but I don't think there would be enough room to max out a RX-7.
Sideways7 is offline  
Old 07-06-04, 04:08 PM
  #112  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Madrx7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 87na
www.aim.com get messanger and send it to me phatchorizo ill host it
doooo it just doo it......*in Stiller Starsky voice......
Madrx7racer is offline  
Old 07-07-04, 10:02 PM
  #113  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Madrx7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well? What happened?
Madrx7racer is offline  
Old 07-07-04, 10:13 PM
  #114  
SUPERnaturally Aspirated

 
shiftnmadkwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wait was this a street or a dyno?

Last edited by shiftnmadkwik; 07-07-04 at 10:16 PM.
shiftnmadkwik is offline  
Old 07-07-04, 10:23 PM
  #115  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally posted by Madrx7racer
well according to you it is only limited in Japan and you are right.....and not in the US....and I am telling you that you are wrong......the FC is limited at around 150 MPH.
No its not. I have done faster in an FC.
scathcart is offline  
Old 07-08-04, 12:45 AM
  #116  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Madrx7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was it stock? My bone stock TII hit 150 and it would decelerate to 145 and it would repeat until I gave up and let off the gas.......it didn't do that after the Fuel and boost controllers tho........
Madrx7racer is offline  
Old 07-08-04, 05:55 PM
  #117  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Of course it wasn't stock, but it was running the stock ECU.
There is no stock speed related fuel cut on any North American Rx-7. Your 150 mph "limiter" must be a mechanical malfunction of your car. I would look into fixing it if you plan on going those speeds consistently.
scathcart is offline  
Old 07-08-04, 06:13 PM
  #118  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Madrx7racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It did not do this after I installed my boost controller and fuel controller tho......and I don't plan on going that fast again....3 times is enough for me....
Madrx7racer is offline  
Old 07-09-04, 08:43 PM
  #119  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
my basically stock TII has gone 170, so I don't see how 180 is that much more difficult.

getting to 140MPH is pretty quick (20 seconds maybe?) and 140-170 takes another 20-30 seconds.

I don't see how anyone on the stock COOLING system could attain these speeds for long, however, as my car started to get hot after 10-15seconds of WOT above 6000RPM.
Terrh is offline  
Old 07-11-04, 12:08 PM
  #120  
#1 Certified Cone Killer

 
PureSephiroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
excuse me mr. canadian but are we talking the same units of measure?
PureSephiroth is offline  
Old 07-11-04, 12:55 PM
  #121  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
I'm talking about MPH.

if it took my car nearly a minute to get to 170km/h (110mph) I would have gotten rid of it (or put in a better motor) LONG ago.
Terrh is offline  
Old 07-11-04, 03:23 PM
  #122  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
How "mostly stock" is this? Are you basing this on a stock tach/speed reading? (stock speedo doesn't go up to 170 mph)
scathcart is offline  
Old 07-11-04, 04:02 PM
  #123  
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!

iTrader: (7)
 
Terrh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Windsor, On
Posts: 8,723
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
GPS.

Mostly stock = intake, 3" turboback. FCD, fuel. 12psi.

~7400RPM in 5th, IIRC.
Terrh is offline  
Old 07-11-04, 05:37 PM
  #124  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
VietFC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Terrh
GPS.

Mostly stock = intake, 3" turboback. FCD, fuel. 12psi.

~7400RPM in 5th, IIRC.
wow, i wouldn't consider that mostly stock.
VietFC is offline  
Old 07-11-04, 08:09 PM
  #125  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Impreza2RX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Millville, NJ
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've taken mine slightly over 7K in 5th, but I have the shorter S4 gearing. I dont believe that his claim is impossible, but hitting 200MPH would require a large port, raised redline, and a huge turbo, wouldn't it?
Impreza2RX7 is offline  


Quick Reply: top speed 112 on a turbo?????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.