top speed 112 on a turbo?????
07-05-04, 09:11 PM
#26
Rotary Enthusiast
Anyone know the stock gear ratios for a 90 T2 tranny is off hand, I don't feel like looking it up right now.
07-05-04, 09:14 PM
#27
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
after I installed my boost controller and fuel controller I hit 246kmh(reading on boost controller) and 150 even on on the speedo......so no...the speedo is not exact/accurate
07-05-04, 09:18 PM
#28
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you had 205/55/16s, T2 gears (i used .719 as 5th), and could actually get 5th to 7500 rpm, you'd be at 188mph. 4th @ 7500 would be 135. i can't imagine you pulling 7500rpm in 5th. much less on what appears to be a stock turbo + top mount.
07-05-04, 09:21 PM
#30
Rotary Enthusiast
Originally posted by casio
if you had 205/55/16s, T2 gears (i used .719 as 5th), and could actually get 5th to 7500 rpm, you'd be at 188mph. 4th @ 7500 would be 135. i can't imagine you pulling 7500rpm in 5th. much less on what appears to be a stock turbo + top mount.
if you had 205/55/16s, T2 gears (i used .719 as 5th), and could actually get 5th to 7500 rpm, you'd be at 188mph. 4th @ 7500 would be 135. i can't imagine you pulling 7500rpm in 5th. much less on what appears to be a stock turbo + top mount.
07-05-04, 09:29 PM
#33
Rotary Enthusiast
Originally posted by casio
if you had 205/55/16s, T2 gears (i used .719 as 5th), and could actually get 5th to 7500 rpm, you'd be at 188mph. 4th @ 7500 would be 135. i can't imagine you pulling 7500rpm in 5th. much less on what appears to be a stock turbo + top mount.
if you had 205/55/16s, T2 gears (i used .719 as 5th), and could actually get 5th to 7500 rpm, you'd be at 188mph. 4th @ 7500 would be 135. i can't imagine you pulling 7500rpm in 5th. much less on what appears to be a stock turbo + top mount.
07-05-04, 09:30 PM
#34
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Madrx7racer
1--3.483
2--2.015
3--1.391
4--1.000
5--0.719
Final--4.300
Reverse--3.288
1--3.483
2--2.015
3--1.391
4--1.000
5--0.719
Final--4.300
Reverse--3.288
07-05-04, 09:30 PM
#35
Originally posted by boostin13b
I've seen a JDM swap with the JDM ECU still in it do plenty more.
I've seen a JDM swap with the JDM ECU still in it do plenty more.
I am pretty sure it's a swithc on the back of the speedo cluster. One of the NZ guys can probably back that up or shoot it down in flames
Anyway. Nice H mount! Is that a custom IC or did you get lucky and find a ebay one or something with those end tanks?
07-05-04, 09:33 PM
#36
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by casio
whoa, where did that 4.3 come from?? T2 was 4.1.
whoa, where did that 4.3 come from?? T2 was 4.1.
07-05-04, 09:33 PM
#37
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by casio
whoa, where did that 4.3 come from?? T2 was 4.1.
whoa, where did that 4.3 come from?? T2 was 4.1.
07-05-04, 09:37 PM
#38
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by boostin13b
I have 235/40/17's on there. I also have the video of the car on the dyno, the sound isn't working yet, but a friend is working on that right now, so if someone wants to host a video, let me know and I'll send it to you.
I have 235/40/17's on there. I also have the video of the car on the dyno, the sound isn't working yet, but a friend is working on that right now, so if someone wants to host a video, let me know and I'll send it to you.
07-05-04, 09:40 PM
#39
Ban Peak
iTrader: (49)
I don't know what gears are in My transmission. It was rebuilt, and they guy at the rotary shop replaced the gears with used ones(since mine were fucked). Also, I have a question about bell housings. Did all of them on Fcs have sort of ribbed reinforcement. because my used tranny hass a round bellhousing, that inst reinforced on the outside.
07-05-04, 09:51 PM
#40
Rotary Enthusiast
Originally posted by casio
if you had 205/55/16s, T2 gears (i used .719 as 5th), and could actually get 5th to 7500 rpm, you'd be at 188mph. 4th @ 7500 would be 135. i can't imagine you pulling 7500rpm in 5th. much less on what appears to be a stock turbo + top mount.
if you had 205/55/16s, T2 gears (i used .719 as 5th), and could actually get 5th to 7500 rpm, you'd be at 188mph. 4th @ 7500 would be 135. i can't imagine you pulling 7500rpm in 5th. much less on what appears to be a stock turbo + top mount.
07-05-04, 09:52 PM
#41
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by boostin13b
I have 235/40/17's on there. I also have the video of the car on the dyno, the sound isn't working yet, but a friend is working on that right now, so if someone wants to host a video, let me know and I'll send it to you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
well your mph just dropped from what i previously listed. 7500 in 4th is 133, 7500 in 5th is 185. i don't think anyone will believe that you acheived 7500rpm in 5th.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by boostin13b
I have 235/40/17's on there. I also have the video of the car on the dyno, the sound isn't working yet, but a friend is working on that right now, so if someone wants to host a video, let me know and I'll send it to you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
well your mph just dropped from what i previously listed. 7500 in 4th is 133, 7500 in 5th is 185. i don't think anyone will believe that you acheived 7500rpm in 5th.
07-05-04, 09:53 PM
#42
Rotary Enthusiast
Originally posted by casio
well your mph just dropped from what i previously listed. 7500 in 4th is 133, 7500 in 5th is 185. i don't think anyone will believe that you acheived 7500rpm in 5th.
well your mph just dropped from what i previously listed. 7500 in 4th is 133, 7500 in 5th is 185. i don't think anyone will believe that you acheived 7500rpm in 5th.
07-05-04, 10:15 PM
#43
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i know you couldn't care what i think, but your mod list was dainty to say the least, yet you're going for a "200mph" run. and no one wants to see the speedo, they want to hear the gears (or see the stickshift) and see your tach. the speedometer isnt good for over 100, why would its exponential fault back up any claim of 185-200? thats the whole reason i brought gears into this.
and since you've been on the dyno doing mph runs, i would think you would have dynoed the car as well. maybe weighed it, too?
and since you've been on the dyno doing mph runs, i would think you would have dynoed the car as well. maybe weighed it, too?
07-05-04, 10:23 PM
#44
Rotary Enthusiast
Originally posted by casio
i know you couldn't care what i think, but your mod list was dainty to say the least, yet you're going for a "200mph" run. and no one wants to see the speedo, they want to hear the gears (or see the stickshift) and see your tach. the speedometer isnt good for over 100, why would its exponential fault back up any claim of 185-200? thats the whole reason i brought gears into this.
and since you've been on the dyno doing mph runs, i would think you would have dynoed the car as well. maybe weighed it, too?
i know you couldn't care what i think, but your mod list was dainty to say the least, yet you're going for a "200mph" run. and no one wants to see the speedo, they want to hear the gears (or see the stickshift) and see your tach. the speedometer isnt good for over 100, why would its exponential fault back up any claim of 185-200? thats the whole reason i brought gears into this.
and since you've been on the dyno doing mph runs, i would think you would have dynoed the car as well. maybe weighed it, too?
07-05-04, 10:23 PM
#45
casio isn't here.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh, and if you have a 185mph+ fc, please, by all means, post a new thread about it. you might also want to list everything possible about the car. if you can *prove* it, then many kudos. if not, i wouldn't bother with a thread.
07-05-04, 10:26 PM
#46
Rotary Enthusiast
Originally posted by casio
oh, and if you have a 185mph+ fc, please, by all means, post a new thread about it. you might also want to list everything possible about the car. if you can *prove* it, then many kudos. if not, i wouldn't bother with a thread.
oh, and if you have a 185mph+ fc, please, by all means, post a new thread about it. you might also want to list everything possible about the car. if you can *prove* it, then many kudos. if not, i wouldn't bother with a thread.
07-05-04, 10:28 PM
#47
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
when I hit 246kmh/150(speedo) I was running 225/50/16 all around......@11 psi and the AVC-R recorded 7300RPM as the peak rpm.....but that is either in 3rd or 4th gear....no way it could ever happen in 5th......
07-05-04, 10:33 PM
#50
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by casio
okay, i'm gonna bring everyone up to date.
2400 pounds, stock turbo, 235/40/17s; 7300-7500rpm in 5th gear (0.719)(180-185mph); 4.1 rear.
okay, i'm gonna bring everyone up to date.
2400 pounds, stock turbo, 235/40/17s; 7300-7500rpm in 5th gear (0.719)(180-185mph); 4.1 rear.
1.2400lbs is decently light.....
2.stock turbo is good for 260 HP if that depending on fuel mods......
3.It doesn't matter what gears you have if you don't have the power to use those gears.
4. did it occur to you that the speedo is inaccurate as soon as you change the rim size? dood, speedo is inaccuraqte even if you get bigger tires!
Last edited by Madrx7racer; 07-05-04 at 10:38 PM.