2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

TID mod: Does pipe size make a difference in performance?

Old May 13, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #1  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
TID mod: Does pipe size make a difference in performance?

I know the TID mod has been discussed to death, but I couldn't find a thread with this information. I was wondering, If I do the TID mod using a 3" ID vs. a 2.5 ID pipe, will I have more horse power? It seems to me that since the pipe has to eventually downsize to 2.5 to fit the turbo, then it wouldn't make a difference to use a 3" pipe. Any thoughts? THANKS
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 10:19 PM
  #2  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
A 3" pipe will cause less restriction than a 2.5" one, period. It doesn't matter that the turbo inlet is 2.5" (2-3/8" actually), the air still has to pass through the TID, and the faster it goes (less area = faster), the harder it is for the engine to suck it. Basic fluid dynamics.

How much difference it makes depends of all you other mods, it might be very little, but given the minimal extra cost of a 3" set-up, you might as will do what works best.

Last edited by NZConvertible; May 13, 2005 at 10:25 PM.
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 11:43 PM
  #3  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
Well, I'm still not sure if it makes a difference or not. If you are considering fluid mechanics, then the turbo inlet does make a difference. Even if you aren't running any kind of air filter at all, the amount of air you are sucking in is still dependent upon the diameter of your turbo inlet. At some point in the piping, the diameter has to go from 3 to 2.5, so I just don't see it making a difference if that occurs right at the turbo or 10 inches away. Another reason I'm considering 2.5 piping is because I am still running the air pump, so 2.5 will give me more clearance.
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #4  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
Any other opinions?
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #5  
usmcjsy's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
From: Glyndon MN
2.5 should be fine. I am running 2.5 IC piping and I bought a 2.5 TB inlet duct off ebay and it seems fine. I have a 3" TID, so I am going from 3" down to 2.5". I have not had any problems and the car still seems to have sh*t load of power.
Reply
Old May 14, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #6  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
"sh*t load of power" --- nice.
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #7  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by kevino
If you are considering fluid mechanics, then the turbo inlet does make a difference. Even if you aren't running any kind of air filter at all, the amount of air you are sucking in is still dependent upon the diameter of your turbo inlet.
It makes a difference to overall airflow, but it makes no difference to the fact that it's harder to pull air through a 2.5" pipe than it is a 3" pipe. Restrictions in a system are cumulative; they all add up to the total flow restriction. Remove or reduce one of these restrictions, even if it's not the worst one in the system, and flow will increase.
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 09:24 AM
  #8  
RotaryBuddha's Avatar
CURVE OF CONSTANT WIDTH
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 1
From: Wesley Chapel, FL
are these any good for a replacement TID.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=38634


and why is it the the n/a one looks exactly the same

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=38634


this is not a question about the filter i know the filters from ebay suck. blah blah blah. dont want a lecture on it.
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #9  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
They seem to have conveniently forgotten about the AFM...
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #10  
RotaryBuddha's Avatar
CURVE OF CONSTANT WIDTH
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 1
From: Wesley Chapel, FL
Originally Posted by NZConvertible
They seem to have conveniently forgotten about the AFM...

would i be able to hook the afm at the end of the pipe then the filter to the afm?
Reply
Old May 15, 2005 | 01:50 PM
  #11  
gerbraldy's Avatar
wtf's a piston
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
From: Englewood, FL
as long as the pipe isn't too long to fit it in the engine bay with the afm+filter attached, I took a 3" intake I had off a neon from the shop and cut it up alittle and works perfect. Your not too far away from me, I live right down by Sarasota.
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 02:45 AM
  #12  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Originally Posted by projectredsuns
would i be able to hook the afm at the end of the pipe then the filter to the afm?
The "kit" only has one coupler, but to connect the AFM you'll need two (plus clamps).
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 03:18 AM
  #13  
kevino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: lancaster pennsylvania
NZConvertible, I thank you for your responses, and judging from the number of posts you have and the incredible amount of times I've seen your name appear in question responses, you undoubtably know what you are talking about. However, considering the original question, I can't see 10 inches of 3" tubing making that much of a difference compared to 2.5 inch tubing (or slightly less anyway). I understand that the engine may have to work a slight amount harder to pull the air (kind of like drinking coffee through those tiny coffee mixing straws). But, considering that the majority of the tubing ( in an 88 TII in this case) is mostly around 2.5 diameter (IC and TB), then I can't see 2.5 intake tubing as being that restrictive. Even if the diameter is that much smaller, the volumetric and mass flow rates will still be consistant with the maximum flows capable of the IC and TB tubing. This is how I view the situation, if I am wrong in this then I am sorry to challenge you intellect. In any case, I thank you and all who have responded.

-kevino
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 05:11 AM
  #14  
NZConvertible's Avatar
I'm a boost creep...
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 8
From: Auckland, New Zealand
I'm not saying it'll make a huge difference (in fact I said "it might be very little" in my first post). I just figure if you're going to go to all the effort to do this, you might as well make the most of it. But if your air pump is going to make a 3" TID difficult then stick with 2.5". I'm sure you'll be happy with it, since it's still a big step up from the stock TID.

Just don't say it'll make no difference...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Feb 26, 2021 10:12 PM
Frisky Arab
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
13
Aug 18, 2015 05:30 PM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 17, 2015 11:50 PM
KAL797
Test Area 51
0
Aug 11, 2015 03:47 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 PM.