2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Technical AFM Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-06, 12:29 AM
  #1  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Technical AFM Question

I think we all know how common it is for us to tell someone to check their AFM, and we may even go as far as saying, "see FSM page such and such." I'd like us to build a better AFM troubleshooting guide that we can point people towards, and it should eventually be part of an overall idle troubleshooting guide. So I went ahead and started the AFM guide (it's purely FSM data so far) here:

http://howto.globalvicinity.com/gv_w...i=95&co=1&vi=1

But I have some questions already. My impression from various discussions here is that the turbo and non-turbo AFMs are different. According to the FSMs, only the S4 AFMs differ in resistance range, while the S5 AFMs appear identical. Am I missing something, or are the S5 AFMs identical between turbo and n/a? Also, if there are more than resistance differences, like different spring constants, please let me know, or just go ahead and update the reference page yourself!

Props to My5ABaby for posting a lot of great FC info. The project now has 40+ how-tos and reference pages. I had originally envisioned the project as purely modification how-tos, but it's shifting towards something much more useful: a sort of community-maintained (and therefore superior) FSM. Very cool.
Old 10-14-06, 12:42 AM
  #2  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (7)
 
Sideways7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Temple, Texas (Central)
Posts: 6,596
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
From a thread a few weeks ago, it appears that the NA and TII afm's, while having the same resistance ranges, have different stiffness springs. The TII spring is stiffer, so it can accomadate the larger airflow a turbo motor can produce. If you use a turbo AFM on an NA, you will run lean, while a non-turbo afm on a turbo car will cause you to run rich, but have the possibility of maxing out the afm.
I'm going to try to post some stuff to your site soon, but I've been real busy lately. A combination of school , watching my daughter, and trying to get the engine swapped into my car in time for the rotary bbq in a week.
Old 10-14-06, 04:22 AM
  #3  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sideways7
From a thread a few weeks ago, it appears that the NA and TII afm's, while having the same resistance ranges, have different stiffness springs. The TII spring is stiffer, so it can accomadate the larger airflow a turbo motor can produce. If you use a turbo AFM on an NA, you will run lean, while a non-turbo afm on a turbo car will cause you to run rich, but have the possibility of maxing out the afm.
Thanks for the info, most conversations here have stuck to S4 N/A and TII differences - including the different spring constants. My searches haven't come up with anything for S5s, though there must be a difference, because Mazdatrix lists four different part numbers:

86-88
Non-turbo: 13-2100-N326
Turbo: 13-2100-N318

89-92
Non-turbo: 13-210R-N350
Turbo: 13-2100-N370



Originally Posted by Sideways7
I'm going to try to post some stuff to your site soon, but I've been real busy lately. A combination of school , watching my daughter, and trying to get the engine swapped into my car in time for the rotary bbq in a week.
How old's your daughter? Depending, that could easily be a full time job right there. It's awesome you want to add to the project; it's only as useful as the community wants it to be!
Old 10-14-06, 11:46 AM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (7)
 
Sideways7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Temple, Texas (Central)
Posts: 6,596
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Shes 15 months. Luckily there's grandparents to help out too, especially on the weekends.
Old 10-14-06, 12:11 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
Rob500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA, USA
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Besides the spring stiffness, the S5 NA and T2 AFM's have physically different shaped plungers.

Rob
Old 10-14-06, 12:17 PM
  #6  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,835
Received 2,604 Likes on 1,847 Posts
if it matters the s3 and s5 nont turbo afms are maxed out stock, both close to redline
Old 10-14-06, 02:53 PM
  #7  
Strength and Honor

Thread Starter
 
stevej88na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA bay area
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rob500
Besides the spring stiffness, the S5 NA and T2 AFM's have physically different shaped plungers.

Rob
Not that I doubt you, that's great information and needed in the reference, especially because the FSM shows the exact same internal diagram for n/a and TII. I'll post that info now, but is that from your personal experience?

Originally Posted by j9fd3s
if it matters the s3 and s5 nont turbo afms are maxed out stock, both close to redline
I'll post that too, it's good info to know.

Thanks for the info guys!
Old 10-14-06, 07:47 PM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
Rob500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA, USA
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as the plunger shape goes, I have several AFM's. The T2 plunger has a fatter more round nose - the NA is more pointed.

Rob
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Donald Hampton
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
16
11-23-22 06:38 PM
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
05-25-21 05:37 AM
nkuhajda
New Member RX-7 Technical
0
09-06-15 02:20 PM



Quick Reply: Technical AFM Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.