2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
View Poll Results: Supercharge the car or Turbo the car
Supercharge and nitrous
18
37.50%
Turbo the car
30
62.50%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

supercharge or turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2003 | 02:00 AM
  #26  
Bebesito21's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
nitrous is a beautiful thing if you know how to use it. it just gets a bad rap....kinda like the rotary engine. Turbo and nitrous...now thats a combo. they might say real men get blown but the really fast cars out there use both so dont let them fool you. thats just what turbo guys say cause they are afraid to use nitrous.
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 03:57 AM
  #27  
West TX RX-7's Avatar
Da Monee Pit
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: Littlefield, Texas
turbo is more efficient and there are many more options available with a turbo.
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 10:57 AM
  #28  
cwsttu's Avatar
Thread Starter
1.3L is not that small
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1
From: Nacogdoches Tx
im gonna go with the turbo , i want the powerband they can offer and i know they are awesome when done right, i have the 88 se so if im correct it was one of the lightest models made and its already been gutted out so whatever i do ill be quick if not fast. now i just need to do a bunch of research to find the best fast/streetable setup heh, thanks for the input guys and yes a sc is unique but i dont want to spend so much money on it and be limited to power and boost when a turbo comes cheaper and more efficient.
Reply
Old May 3, 2003 | 12:08 PM
  #29  
Roy James's Avatar
My cars louder than yours
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA
Originally posted by Rotorific
Well... whoever is in front at the line is the winner, no matter what the hells its on.

Anyways, If i had all the money in the world I'd probably run a bad *** blower setup, but ****, turboing these cars are cheaper. A blower alone cost around 1500+ from what i have seen, and they usually drop off j(over-rev)at around 6500RPMs or so (unless you get a bigger pully, but then you compromise some power). I'd personally, if i were you, run a turbo. Check out Aaron Cakes post about his N/A+Turbo setup. Looks good, works good, and is fairly cheap, probably about as much as a blower compresor alone.

But dont just take my word for it --reading rainbow theme here--
DDDDOOOOOOHHHH!! I did it again, i forgot that Gabe was on my computer earlier yesterday, so this is my post accually. Sorry fellas.
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 09:13 AM
  #30  
introVert's Avatar
putting it down daily
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, CA
I was toying with the idea of putting an SC on my 88 vert- but didn't like the idea of carbing it- and now I see the EFI manufacturer (theracingstore.com) is here in my town! Time to start saving the pennies! Got a few drivetrain issues to iron out first (LSD, new clutch)
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 01:06 PM
  #31  
j200pruf's Avatar
RIP Icemark
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 1
From: Aloha OR
Hey introVert. If you go down there would you ask them about using some of there throttles on the Racing beat upper intake that was made for side draft DOCE carbs? And what microtech they would suggest using?
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 03:58 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
as far as the s/c over-revving at around 6500 rpms, someone needs to do their homework. Look at the Eaton M90. It is the one that Ford put on the Thunderbird SC. This one can spin safely to over 13K rpms. It is also a lot cheaper than buying the nelson/Paxton kit, which isn't made anymore as far as I remember. It is just a matter of fabbing your brackets and doing some testing to find the right size pulley. well, obviously there is more to it than that, but if you can do your own fab work, you could do this for a lot less than the $3-4K that you could spend on a kit. It is also intercooled in the Fords and GM cars that use it, and I would use an IC for this in a 7 as well, so then you have to put together the ducting. Overall, I can tell you that the T-bird with the stock 3.8 V6 is a dog, but the SC 3.8 V6 is a HUGE difference. My T-Bird SC is also a stick, which just kicks ***--I have driven the automatics, and the stick is smooth. I have a spare M90, so I am looking at it now for the 7. I know it won't be as much power as some turbos, but I am not trying to get my 7 to run 12's in the quarter either.

If you look at Atkins, they only make a kit for carbs, but they have been working on one for the EFI. hopefully should be done this year.
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 11:23 PM
  #33  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
I've been casually looking into superchargers on ebay over the last week and have seen the Ford roots SC for the thunderbird go for $300ish . . . and another one that caught my eye was off the Mercedes Kompressor engine, being a roots type with an electromagnetic clutch on the pulley so you can turn it off if you are just cruising and don't need the boost (and parasite drag on the engine).

But I have to correct my earlier remark about not needing an intercooler. At least with roots type compressors, IC's seem mandatory for any real boost. Doing your own bracket, pulley, and duct work plus an on-off switch and some form of boost control would make one unique sleeper FC for less than $1000 in parts.
Reply
Old May 11, 2003 | 01:08 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally posted by 88IntegraLS
I've been casually looking into superchargers on ebay over the last week and have seen the Ford roots SC for the thunderbird go for $300ish . . . and another one that caught my eye was off the Mercedes Kompressor engine, being a roots type with an electromagnetic clutch on the pulley so you can turn it off if you are just cruising and don't need the boost (and parasite drag on the engine).

But I have to correct my earlier remark about not needing an intercooler. At least with roots type compressors, IC's seem mandatory for any real boost. Doing your own bracket, pulley, and duct work plus an on-off switch and some form of boost control would make one unique sleeper FC for less than $1000 in parts.
That is exactly what i am saying--the cost is a lot less. I saw the Mercedes units too--they would be a lot easier to fit because they do not have the long snout that the standard M90 has. In order to fit the Ford M90, you have to have clearance most of the way back to the firewall. Fitting an intercooler and the ducting is easier because of the room in the engine compartment. you would also have to have a piece fabbed that would connect your ducting from the bottom of the sc. Some people have said that you would need to have a custom intake manifold done, and this would be sweet, but that is when you start getting up in the cost again. I would love to have that done, and when I get more cash I will look into having a custom im done, but it isn't needed to make it work. It would make it a much cleaner look though.
Reply
Old May 11, 2003 | 01:15 PM
  #35  
88IntegraLS's Avatar
Displacement > Boost
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
I was thinking of using my lower six port manifold with a TII center and upper manifold bolted to it . . . then the IC pipes from the FMIC leading to the SC with the throttle body connected to its input flange using a machine shop adapter . . . all fed by my ram air intake of course

That would be sweet to keep the NA smoothness but with some more low end torque.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
Feb 26, 2021 10:12 PM
Th0m4s
Build Threads
25
Feb 26, 2019 02:04 AM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
ChrisRX8PR
Single Turbo RX-7's
18
Aug 21, 2015 01:56 PM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Aug 17, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 AM.