street or brigde ??? which 1 should i go for
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 305 MIAMI KENDALL
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
street or brigde ??? which 1 should i go for
i geting a great deal on a motor brigde ported thats pined ready for boost, but my friend tweak aka luis says i should go for a street port, ???? wat u guys think, its going into a s5 turboII,
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 305 MIAMI KENDALL
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea iam be with runing the stock ecu, but iam be stand alone at the end of this year i hope, but the brigde port would give me a lot more power then a street port would ???
#4
always modding
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: on a tiny island in the middle of a sea
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
if u plan on revving the **** out of it all the time AKA race car.. go BP
if u want it to still be streetable.. u can get away with a large street port...
all depends on what u wanna do with the thing
if u want it to still be streetable.. u can get away with a large street port...
all depends on what u wanna do with the thing
Trending Topics
#8
Rotary Power
iTrader: (15)
id say go for the 1/2 bridge or full bridge , but the problem is tuning like they said... sure it will run and drive ... im not exactly a tuning expert but i do know the stock ecu has a rev limiter at 7800-8000 rpm on s4, on s5 its like 8600 rpm
aside from that youd want to modify the fuel map and ignition timing and prolly ge rid of the stock maf because its not that efficent for a bridgeported motor, since youll probably redline up to 9-10k with a bridgeported motor the stock ecu stuff just wont be giving you the true power out of your motor since your peak power would be made at above the stock rev limter but u can stil drive it with a stock ecu, it just wont be running at its full potential, but all u do is bump the idle up and it will idle fine
dont quote me on anything i say but im just sayin id rather have a bridge port than a streetport since it would make ur car sound mean as hell and make it fast as hell
in my honest opinion, get what you want who gives a **** what anyone else tries to tell you what is ' best for the street' , its your car you do what you want with it regardless of others opinions
aside from that youd want to modify the fuel map and ignition timing and prolly ge rid of the stock maf because its not that efficent for a bridgeported motor, since youll probably redline up to 9-10k with a bridgeported motor the stock ecu stuff just wont be giving you the true power out of your motor since your peak power would be made at above the stock rev limter but u can stil drive it with a stock ecu, it just wont be running at its full potential, but all u do is bump the idle up and it will idle fine
dont quote me on anything i say but im just sayin id rather have a bridge port than a streetport since it would make ur car sound mean as hell and make it fast as hell
in my honest opinion, get what you want who gives a **** what anyone else tries to tell you what is ' best for the street' , its your car you do what you want with it regardless of others opinions
#9
Lives on the Forum
Originally Posted by 12akid
yea iam be with runing the stock ecu, but iam be stand alone at the end of this year i hope, but the brigde port would give me a lot more power then a street port would ???
-Ted
#11
GrapefruitRacing?
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: PartSource
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eViLRotor
Half-Bridge. Best of both worlds.
Streetable and more punch.
Streetable and more punch.
Agreed. Recently went for a ride in a friends half bridge with stock turbo on a standalone and Wow.. really good response, now he just needs a bigger turbo.!
#13
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eViLRotor
Half-Bridge. Best of both worlds.
Streetable and more punch.
Streetable and more punch.
Full half-bridge, or 1/3 bridge? Heh, this is my current problem I seriously can't decide if I should just bridge the aux or the aux and secondary, I'm at a standstill!
#14
Rotors? What Are Those?
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jefferson City, Tn
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hes gonna be boosted so i told him no point really of going with such a big port i told him to go with a large streetport and upgraded turbo (oviously with fuel to compensate) and work from there i dont see a point of idling at like 1500 rpm and getting shitty gas milage for an everyday street/race car
TwEaK
TwEaK
#18
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
Originally Posted by dDuB
What about n/a guys?
Full half-bridge, or 1/3 bridge? Heh, this is my current problem I seriously can't decide if I should just bridge the aux or the aux and secondary, I'm at a standstill!
Full half-bridge, or 1/3 bridge? Heh, this is my current problem I seriously can't decide if I should just bridge the aux or the aux and secondary, I'm at a standstill!
#20
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
It was pointless.
Edit...Maybe a little more detail. I realised that I didn't care much if the idle was nasty, and that with boost, low end is nowhere near as bad as what people say with bridgeport timing. Just looking at a few dyno graphs proved that to me.
Edit...Maybe a little more detail. I realised that I didn't care much if the idle was nasty, and that with boost, low end is nowhere near as bad as what people say with bridgeport timing. Just looking at a few dyno graphs proved that to me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post