2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Solid mounts Good idea or bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 12:25 AM
  #1  
BigPimpin''s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 0
From: Hagerstown, MD
Solid mounts Good idea or bad?

Got a deal on some solid motor and tranny mounts, also rear diff mount. Anybody use them? Gimme some feedback.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 12:32 AM
  #2  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
i dont think they ride bad. i only have the solid motor mounts. i'm not sure if i should be waiting for something to break or not. in that respect, i regret buying them. it was one of those things. my engine was getting rebuilt and that was the best time to do it. honestly, i wish i had some nice expensive polyurethane mounts.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 12:33 AM
  #3  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
I run solid motor, tranny, and diff mounts and daily drive my RX-7 to and from school every day. Personally, not a big deal at all to me. However, at or above around 55-60 mph the vibrations from the engine and tranny can be felt because of the solid mounts and the car vibrates. Not really a big deal, kinda like a massage But on long distance trips on the freeway it can get annoying, again it still doesn't bother me at all.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 12:39 AM
  #4  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
haha, is that what that vibration was? the other night, i was just cruising on the highway when a Prelude and Boxster flew past me. i started to chase them, but they were pretty much gone. while in higher RPMs it seemed to vibrate like wheels that need an alignment. maybe it was the mounts? and i thought rotaries revved smooth!!
my car is daily driven as well. aint no thang.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 02:13 AM
  #5  
BklynRX7's Avatar
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
I had bought the same mounts but when i gave them to my mechanic who put in after my engine was done being rebuilt, he told me that they would be a bad idea for a daily driver and I wouldnt gte a noticeable gain in anything to justify them.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 02:22 AM
  #6  
ScrapFC's Avatar
Emerald Triangle for life
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
I'm running competition polyurethane mounts and I think they're really the best compromise for street/light track duty. Everything feels solid and well planted, yet vibration is at a minimum. I don't think solid mounts would be much fun on the street...
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 02:46 PM
  #7  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by casio
haha, is that what that vibration was? the other night, i was just cruising on the highway when a Prelude and Boxster flew past me. i started to chase them, but they were pretty much gone. while in higher RPMs it seemed to vibrate like wheels that need an alignment. maybe it was the mounts? and i thought rotaries revved smooth!!
my car is daily driven as well. aint no thang.
Probably. But to be honest, I ran the solid motor and differential mounts first with stock tranny mounts and I got no *noticeable* vibration at any speed. After adding the solid tranny mounts, though, it's definitely noticeable though not bad. After that little comparison it is my opinion that the solid tranny mounts make the biggest vibration difference.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 02:58 PM
  #8  
chris_stampe's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Spearfish, SD
I always thought it was the added shock stress on the driveline that justified not using solid mounts. You guys seem to just be worried about vibration. That being said I use solid motor mounts and dont feel any abnormal vibration. You notice way more difference in vibration by switching to an aftermarket exhaust I think.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #9  
gerbraldy's Avatar
wtf's a piston
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
From: Englewood, FL
lol, put a turbo 302ci in there and run some solid mounts, that would be a nice massage.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 04:09 PM
  #10  
casio's Avatar
casio isn't here.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,332
Likes: 0
From: Greenpoint, Brooklyn
Originally Posted by chris_stampe
I always thought it was the added shock stress on the driveline that justified not using solid mounts. You guys seem to just be worried about vibration. That being said I use solid motor mounts and dont feel any abnormal vibration. You notice way more difference in vibration by switching to an aftermarket exhaust I think.
thats what i was referring to about waiting for something to break. i would say the stress is from the vibration. the motor mounts would transfer the vibration and "soak" it up, whereas now its a straight transfer. this is how i believe it works; i'm no expert on the subject. also to be noted is that this (vibration) is said to be the reason FWD cars (mainly drag that i hear of) break halfshafts. they don't hook up as well and the wheelspin causes a vibration which is apparently very horrible on the drivetrain; halfshafts.
i'm more worried about something breaking than i am the vibration. as far as i'm concerned, the motor mounts themselves are easily streetable.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 04:30 PM
  #11  
chris_stampe's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Spearfish, SD
Yeah, well I understand what your saying, but I dont believe its so much the vibration, but the shock that kills solidly mounted drivetrains. If you think about it, when you launch the motor and trany twists slightly...or not so slightly. If it isnt alowed to twist, then that centriphical (sp) force has to be taken up somewhere, and it ends up being your tranny, driveshaft or otherwise. Please someone correct me if my thinkin isnt quite right here.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:42 PM
  #12  
BigPimpin''s Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 0
From: Hagerstown, MD
Thanks for all the input. Keep 'em coming!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BNR34RB26DETT
Build Threads
42
Feb 28, 2018 11:27 AM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
Aug 11, 2015 04:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.