2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Safe to Run 93 Octane??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #26  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by ecko
i always went too how much mods you have in your car...thats how i see what octane to use.
Therefore, if I have stock NA engine, racing coil-overs, a full roll cage, racing seats and harnesses, short shifter, nice stereo system, Delrin bushings, competition sway bars, performance brake pads, aftermarket steering wheel and shifter, body kit, cool paint job, aftermarket spoiler, aftermarket wheels, competition radiator and oil cooler, and ricer stickers all over my car, then I must need REALLY high octane.

Not such a great way to determine the octane requirement, eh?

Originally Posted by NCross
A stock RX-7 in average condition will not burn all of the fuel anyway so there is no need for anything over 87 without large boost or porting etc. A rotary engine is fairly wasteful with fuel. That is why you see them shooting flames when straight piped. The unburned fuel is sent out through the exhaust and ignites there.
No.

Originally Posted by REDFC3S86
Is it still ok to run 87 on a street ported N/A?
Yes, it is fine to use 87 because porting does not raise compression. Since none of the RX-7 rotors have all that much compression, the ignition timing is the main factor that could increase the fuel octane requirement in an NA engine.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #27  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Therefore, if I have stock NA engine, racing coil-overs, a full roll cage, racing seats and harnesses, short shifter, nice stereo system, Delrin bushings, competition sway bars, performance brake pads, aftermarket steering wheel and shifter, body kit, cool paint job, aftermarket spoiler, aftermarket wheels, competition radiator and oil cooler, and ricer stickers all over my car, then I must need REALLY high octane.

Not such a great way to determine the octane requirement, eh?


No.


Yes, it is fine to use 87 because porting does not raise compression. Since none of the RX-7 rotors have all that much compression, the ignition timing is the main factor that could increase the fuel octane requirement in an NA engine.
Man, I am so happy that I am not the only one to post this kind of info. Great job Evil!!!! Thanks for helping!
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 09:21 PM
  #28  
Force Fed's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Spartanburg area, SC
You get a bit better mileage by using 87, because it burns easier. As was said, the lowest octane you can run on your setup w/o spark knocking is what you want, no matter what the setup is. The reason high-compression or high-boost engines run higher octane is because it doesn't burn as easy or quickly, and resists pre-detonation (pinging, spark knock, same thing) and so allows more boost or timing.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #29  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by Icemark
Man, I am so happy that I am not the only one to post this kind of info. Great job Evil!!!! Thanks for helping!
No problem. I hate to see so much BS floating around about fuel, especially when it sucks money out of the wallets of poor rotorheads. Sometimes it turns into what seems like an Evil Aviator QA session, but I don't mind spending a bit of my time so these guys are not as ignorant as the other car enthusiasts. It would be nice if one of the forum chemists helped me out now and then, but I guess there aren't too many of them who specialize in POL.

Could you maybe hook up a forum function that shocks anybody who posts anything about octane other than AKI and cost?

Last edited by Evil Aviator; Aug 18, 2008 at 10:23 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #30  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by Force Fed
You get a bit better mileage by using 87, because it burns easier.
False

Originally Posted by Force Fed
As was said, the lowest octane you can run on your setup w/o spark knocking is what you want, no matter what the setup is.
Yes, assuming that cost is a factor.

Originally Posted by Force Fed
The reason high-compression or high-boost engines run higher octane is because it doesn't burn as easy or quickly
False

Originally Posted by Force Fed
and resists pre-detonation (pinging, spark knock, same thing) and so allows more boost or timing.
True (ignoring the incorrect terminology of "pre-detonation")

Not bad, 50%.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 10:19 PM
  #31  
SDrotary-FC's Avatar
@ pipnorcali
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,751
Likes: 1
From: Grass valley, ca
i heard they used to run 87oct in the mazda factory race cars in the 70's-80's
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 06:22 AM
  #32  
Force Fed's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Spartanburg area, SC
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
False


Yes, assuming that cost is a factor.


False


True (ignoring the incorrect terminology of "pre-detonation")

Not bad, 50%.
Lol, well what are the correct answers then? And what is the difference between spark knock, pinging, detonation and pre-detonation? I help a lot of people out w/ this kinda stuff on other forums and in person, so I need to make sure I'm giving out proper info
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #33  
Petrol Burner's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: ogden UT
If your car isn't tuned to run 93 octane, then there is no need to run it. I run 85 octane in my seven. they don't sell higher octane like that in higher altitude areas.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #34  
NCross's Avatar
I have a rotary addiction
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 24
From: Columbia, Tennessee
Actually I noticed an increase in MPG when I switched from 93 to 87 with premix. From 16MPG average to 23MPG average.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #35  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by Force Fed
Lol, well what are the correct answers then? And what is the difference between spark knock, pinging, detonation and pre-detonation?
Spark knock = Pinging. Once the combustion of the air-fuel mixture is initiated by the spark plug, the flame front is supposed to spread smoothly through the combustion chamber. High temperatures or pressures can auto-ignite a portion of the mixture prior to the flame front reaching it, causing the pressure waves to collide and rapidly increase the pressure inside the combustion chamber, creating a pinging or knocking noise. This is also called detonation.

Pre-detonation = A common incorrect term made by combining the terms "pre-ignition" and "detonation".

Pre-ignition = When a hot spot in the engine ignites the fuel-air mixture prior to the initiation of the spark, or otherwise without the spark, such as run-on (dieseling).

Originally Posted by Force Fed
You get a bit better mileage by using 87
Gas mileage has nothing to do with the octane rating.

Originally Posted by Force Fed
The reason high-compression or high-boost engines run higher octane is because it doesn't burn as easy or quickly
A fuel with an 87 octane rating will DETONATE easier than one with a higher octane rating, but it does not necessarily BURN easier.

Also, there are several types of octane ratings. Two fuels could have the same Anti-Knock Index number, but one could have a higher Motor Octane Number. Example:
Brand A "93 Octane" (97 RON + 89 MON ) /2 = AKI 93
Brand B "93 Octane" (94 RON + 92 MON ) /2 = AKI 93
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 02:28 AM
  #36  
FC Australia's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
The higher the octane of the fuel, the more compression is can withstand without causing detonation... This is why you can safely turn the boost up in a turbo engine if you are using a premium fuel. Most people should know that it is always advisable to run high octane fuel in any turbo, or high compression N/A motor. I won't fill my tank with anything below 98.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 04:43 AM
  #37  
Evil Aviator's Avatar
Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 39
From: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Originally Posted by FC Australia
Most people should know that it is always advisable to run high octane fuel in any turbo, or high compression N/A motor. I won't fill my tank with anything below 98.
No, it is not necessarily advisable to run high octane fuel in ANY turbo motor. The 87-91 RX-7 Turbo is rated for a minimum octane of 87 (R+M)/2 in the USA. I ran my slightly modified 88 TII for years on low octane fuel without any problems. The fuel in your country tends to be less stable, so see your owner's manual for the minimum RON required.

Yes, higher boost, higher engine load, advanced ignition timing, higher temperatures, lower humidity, higher atmospheric pressure, and engine hot spots will increase the octane requirement. Higher octane fuel will not hurt anything but your wallet.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #38  
ecko's Avatar
E85 Powered
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (57)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
From: Long Island NY
meaning mods too the motor sorry.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
4
Jun 26, 2016 10:21 AM
alphawolff
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
17
Nov 17, 2015 05:57 PM
stickmantijuana
Engine Management Forum
11
Nov 9, 2015 01:15 PM
rx7brandon
General Rotary Tech Support
3
Aug 16, 2015 10:55 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:49 AM.