2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

S4 NA build; second opinion request

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2016 | 11:47 AM
  #1  
Mazdarian's Avatar
Thread Starter
80's vibes
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 16
From: Europe
S4 NA build; second opinion request

A rough outline of the planned (re)build;

S4 NA 13B, all original parts w/ new front iron
Streetport or small bridgeport
Stock or T2 injectors (primary/secondary/all)
Functional 6PI
RTek stage 2 ECU upgrade
RB header
Port-matched & polished intake

Now, i've put a fair deal of thought into this build already, but I crave some feedback / naysayers. Just to test my theories with/against to make sure I haven't overlooked something critical. Any input would be greatly appreciated!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 12:33 AM
  #2  
GrossPolluter's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 2
From: CA
I would consider to try to get your hands on s5 na rotors and counterweights if your going through with a build. S5 intake manifold too. The s5 intake manifold could be done later bolt on, but once the engine is built, you wont be able to do the rotors later
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 01:25 AM
  #3  
Mazdarian's Avatar
Thread Starter
80's vibes
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 16
From: Europe
Originally Posted by GrossPolluter
I would consider to try to get your hands on s5 na rotors and counterweights if your going through with a build. S5 intake manifold too. The s5 intake manifold could be done later bolt on, but once the engine is built, you wont be able to do the rotors later
I take it this would be due to the higher compression of the S5 rotors? I'd be willing to go with the S5 intake though for several reasons; I've read the S4 NA intake to be more restrictive? That, and the S5 6PI system is exhaust back-pressure operated, correct? The rotors I'm reluctant to swap: with my current S4 rotors being in pristine condition and with short block / internals scarcely available and hella expensive over here in Holland it wouldn't feel right ditching the original ones. On the other hand, I'm after NA power, so I might be convinced if along with my other mods the gains would prove substantial enough to make it worth while. Anyone?

Edit: If rotor-swap, the original S4 NArotors would be a good thing to store for later turbo applications? Or were those the S4/S5 turbo rotors? Additionally; would RX8 rotors be an option compression-wise? They're lighter right?

Last edited by Mazdarian; Jan 27, 2016 at 01:30 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 07:11 AM
  #4  
jjwalker's Avatar
MECP Certified Installer
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 3
From: Mesquite, TX-DFW
The S5 6PI system controlled by the computer and uses air from the air pump. If you use the S5 manifold, you'll need to use an RPM switch and extra emissions solenoid. It's not plug and play.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 12:36 PM
  #5  
Mazdarian's Avatar
Thread Starter
80's vibes
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 121
Likes: 16
From: Europe
Originally Posted by jjwalker
The S5 6PI system controlled by the computer and uses air from the air pump. If you use the S5 manifold, you'll need to use an RPM switch and extra emissions solenoid. It's not plug and play.
Yeah my bad. You see, the thing is; mine's a Euro FC so the 6PI is the butterfly-valve system with the actuators connected through a vacuum solenoid to the intake manifold.

While on that topic; I've noticed the RTek 2.0 for the S4 doesn't support 6PI/VDI control. There is - however - the possibility of adding one or two RPM-triggered functions. Could something be made to operate the S4's solenoid-switched vacuum operated 6PI from these programmable functions?

thanks for the replies!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2016 | 05:25 PM
  #6  
roTAR needz fundZ
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,614
Likes: 31
From: Freeland, MI
US S4 don't have any electrical part to engage the actuators

Except the ACV i guess, but thats more emissions i believe
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2016 | 02:06 PM
  #7  
wozzoom's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 903
Likes: 1
From: Conyngham, PA
Originally Posted by Mazdarian
A rough outline of the planned (re)build;

S4 NA 13B, all original parts w/ new front iron
Streetport or small bridgeport
Stock or T2 injectors (primary/secondary/all)
Functional 6PI
RTek stage 2 ECU upgrade
RB header
Port-matched & polished intake

Now, i've put a fair deal of thought into this build already, but I crave some feedback / naysayers. Just to test my theories with/against to make sure I haven't overlooked something critical. Any input would be greatly appreciated!
Without knowing your ultimate goal for the car, it's hard to give feedback. If you're on a tight budget, the S4 rotors and intake will be fine. If you have money to buy rotors, the S5 rotors with front and rear counterweight is a good upgrade for any build. The S5 intake will make more power on the top end from 5000rpm to redline, but the S4 intake has strait runners for better power and torque down low. For a daily driver, I prefer the S4 intake over the S5. So yeah, lots of options depending on your goal...

If you're on a budget, I'd say stick with the parts you have and get a light weight flywheel. Even the lightweight steel flywheel from around $300 US is better than the stock. Best money you'll ever spend to wake up a non-turbo.

Don't waste money on the turbo injectors. You will never run out of fuel with the stock injectors on a non-turbo. If by some miracle you did run out of fuel, a Turbo II fuel pump would be cheaper.

-Jeff
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2016 | 10:15 AM
  #8  
rotarygod's Avatar
Rotors still spinning
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,181
Likes: 23
From: Houston
With your list, I'd eliminate the bridgeport thought. Streetport only. As far as injectors go, you've got more than enough. Your fuel pump is fine too. The recommendation about the flywheel is a good one. It has always been my favorite must do mod. Well, that and a header. If your motor needs to be rebuilt, as in it's about to die, go ahead and do a port job. If your motor is fine, spend your money elsewhere first.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2016 | 08:34 PM
  #9  
SpikeDerailed's Avatar
This sh*t burns oil!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 5
From: Charlotte, NC - USA
Originally Posted by Mazdarian
Yeah my bad. You see, the thing is; mine's a Euro FC so the 6PI is the butterfly-valve system with the actuators connected through a vacuum solenoid to the intake manifold.

While on that topic; I've noticed the RTek 2.0 for the S4 doesn't support 6PI/VDI control. There is - however - the possibility of adding one or two RPM-triggered functions. Could something be made to operate the S4's solenoid-switched vacuum operated 6PI from these programmable functions?

thanks for the replies!
If you have a euro spec S4 that mean you still have the distributor with two coils/igniters as well. Sadly without wiring the us spec ecu wont work on your car, although if it did iirc the s4 rtek ecus can set the egr output as a rpm switch.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TpCpLaYa
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
May 1, 2016 08:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.