2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

S-AFC, when is it useful?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 09:46 PM
  #1  
Chimeron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
S-AFC, when is it useful?

Ok, at what point would you guys recommend getting an AFC? I hear a lot of people talking about how the N/As get really rich when you free up the exhaust and intake so I'm curious at what point most of you would suggest them. Also, can you really do anything useful with it without putting your car on an dyno for tuning?
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:00 PM
  #2  
Ronac's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, B.C.
The Safc works really well no matter what mods are on your car. Our cars run rich so putting in and tuning the safc will give your car a lot more power and better gas milage too.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:03 PM
  #3  
Amur_'s Avatar
Refined Valley Dude
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: Kitchener, Ontario (Hamilton's armpit)
True dat. I've read that the ECU dumps in an absurd amount of gas in the upper rev range. An S-AFC can correct that.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:19 PM
  #4  
Chimeron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
That's what I've been reading lately, and I'm very curious about the best way to tune it without a dyno, too expensive and not really too available around here.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:22 PM
  #5  
Ronac's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, B.C.
Just go to a place with a wideband o2 sensor and then run the car on the street. Doing that should be better than doing it on a dyno because you get a more realistic amount of air for you car.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #6  
Chimeron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
ok, another question I'm stupid someone explain the whole wideband o2 sensor that I've not read so much about.

EDIT: or I could just use the SEARCH BUTTON !?!?!?!

Last edited by Chimeron; Feb 25, 2004 at 10:31 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:32 PM
  #7  
Ronac's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, B.C.
Hehe
go search...
=P

Its an accurate sensor to measure what air to fuel ratio you car is running at a certain point.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
Chimeron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Great info guys, thanks for the help. Definitely gonna get one since I have plans for my car.

Hmmm... If I get about 28 mpg on long highways trips now...... nah, can't get much better than that.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:50 PM
  #9  
Amur_'s Avatar
Refined Valley Dude
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: Kitchener, Ontario (Hamilton's armpit)
Originally posted by Chimeron
That's what I've been reading lately, and I'm very curious about the best way to tune it without a dyno, too expensive and not really too available around here.


I have an S-AFC in my car, but I'm holding off on tuning it until the 5th/6th ports are working (I have an rpm switch setup for them but the switch needs a repair.)

Anyway, I've talked to my mechanic at length about the S-AFC (he's got 10 years experience with rotaries, including drag cars) and he's assured me that a dyno isn't needed to tune it, nor a wideband. In his words, a couple of good, hard runs on a quiet road is all you need.

Make of that what you will. Me, I trust him, plus it sounds a hell of a lot better than $125 an hour to do the same job...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 10:54 PM
  #10  
Ronac's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, B.C.
Uhhh I wouldn't trust him to tune your Safc without wideband...

Running too lean will cause detonation...
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 11:22 PM
  #11  
Amur_'s Avatar
Refined Valley Dude
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,283
Likes: 2
From: Kitchener, Ontario (Hamilton's armpit)
Well, good thing it's not up to you, then. He knows what he's doing and it won't be the first time he's done it. Don't worry - if the job does go south I won't send you the bill.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #12  
wtdpn115's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: lincoln, Ne
yea i'm gonna go tune my s-afc2 pretty sooon, my friend tuned his and he was able to sqeeeze out 24whp and is pretty lean...just on the edge but its all goood
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2004 | 11:51 PM
  #13  
TurboII RudeBoy's Avatar
Post count is over rated
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 468
Likes: 1
From: Ft.lauderdale,FL
do a baseline run, see ur afr and what rpms u get too rich under 12:1 then lean the areas out jus a couple points at first then do another run, a 125 hour is better than a rebuild or at the least time without ur car.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 08:07 AM
  #14  
Chimeron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
wtdpn: you saying he got an extra 24 Whp out of his car just by tuning with an s-afc2? What car is that on?

EDIT: Another thing, how much difference is there between running the apexi S-AFC and the apexi S-AFC II. Those seem to be the most popular ones. I know the II has more points and closer rpms, but is that the main difference? I would probably get the S-AFC, not the second one.

Last edited by Chimeron; Feb 26, 2004 at 08:12 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 08:52 AM
  #15  
Gibenstein's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
Ok..... Last time I checked we discussed that a SAFC is a waste for a first mod on a N/A car when there is so much HP to be made somewhere else(I.E. Intake , Exhaust , etc.). Also SAFC is used to control fuel to air ratio which I think is a waste to use on a N/A unless ported the only reason for a SAFC as first mod is to control your gas mileage and at thats a waste since you add on the exhaust and intake(which will suck more air in) your gonna eat more gas anyways since the SAFC is tuned for just stock. People use SAFC to just tune up the air to fuel ratio hence More fuel = More power.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 09:00 AM
  #16  
1987RX7guy's Avatar
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,752
Likes: 1
From: Laredo, Tx
People normally tune back their fuel. ie lean them out. Therefore "correct fuel to air ratio=power" not "more fuel=more power"
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 09:12 AM
  #17  
Gibenstein's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
Psh... All I have to say waste of 300 dollars when you can buy a new exhaust or a CAI. But its your money.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #18  
krazykoncepts's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,790
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
but i have intake and an exhuast...without porting or swapping the engine...is the s-afc worth it? or wut mod is next?
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 09:46 AM
  #19  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally posted by Gibenstein
Ok..... Last time I checked we discussed that a SAFC is a waste for a first mod on a N/A car when there is so much HP to be made somewhere else(I.E. Intake , Exhaust , etc.). Also SAFC is used to control fuel to air ratio which I think is a waste to use on a N/A unless ported the only reason for a SAFC as first mod is to control your gas mileage and at thats a waste since you add on the exhaust and intake(which will suck more air in) your gonna eat more gas anyways since the SAFC is tuned for just stock. People use SAFC to just tune up the air to fuel ratio hence More fuel = More power.
You'll make more power with a properly tuned S-AFC then you would with a CAI or catback.

More fuel != more power
More air and fuel = more power

You use an S-AFC to LEAN OUT an NA.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 11:40 AM
  #20  
Chimeron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Thanks Aaron, that's what I was thinking and since I consider you almost a rotary deity I will trust you on that it is worth it.

Gibenstein: What about the Apexi S-AFC (not II) that is on e-bay for less than or around $150? That sounds worth it for me. e: Even if just for gas milage and a few hp.

Also, concerning the exhaust/intake, I AM getting an exhaust, not the best but it will basically be a RB cat-replacement/presilencer to a *hopefully* Rx7.com 50mm cat-back, the cheap one Also, I'm thinking about getting some sort of intake and making an airbox, but I don't know if I have funds for that too. I need some for my girlfriend

And yes, I like the smileys

Last edited by Chimeron; Feb 26, 2004 at 11:44 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 01:12 PM
  #21  
Sir Rupert Hobo's Avatar
seven-less
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
From: city of houston.... y0!
Rx7.com 50mm cat-back eh? check my sig.. is that the one you want?

IT IS? GIMME A PM !

BTW, i can get an SAFC for CHEAP. all this talk about more power gain is getting me excited. but i must save for the TII swap at the end of the year...
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #22  
RarestRX's Avatar
NA Powah, Every Hour!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA, U S of A
Yo,


Before:



After:



My true duals, Pineapple racing sleeves, ported manifolds, TB mod got me 5 extra RWHP.

The S-AFC II got me 15 extra RWHP.

You can decide which is the better mod.

Here's the dyno thread:

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...hreadid=269541

It cost me $150 to dyno tune the car, which is considerably less than a new motor.

Kevin
1989 GTUs "Dyno time = worth it."
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 01:45 PM
  #23  
Sir Rupert Hobo's Avatar
seven-less
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
From: city of houston.... y0!
true dat playa. if i ever do get my SAFC i'll be tuning it on the dyno. i don't really feel like f*cking up my motor just yet...
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #24  
selanne8's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: morgan hill, ca, usa
s-afc is good for passing smog too (lean it out when the sniffer's hooked up)

john
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2004 | 12:24 AM
  #25  
Chimeron's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
well what do you think about tuning it with a wideband o2 sensor as suggested earlier?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 AM.