2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

S-AFC tach vs Stock tach.. WHICH IS RIGHT??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 04:10 PM
  #1  
Bambam7's Avatar
Thread Starter
I came, I saw, I boosted.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Question S-AFC tach vs Stock tach.. WHICH IS RIGHT??

OK, Most people that have installed an S-AFC in there car have noticed a discrepancy between the RPM readings on the S-AFC and on the factory tach. Usually to the tune of a few hundred rpms.
I know mine is out by maybe 100-200 rpms.
Also- I havn't checked to see if it's a ratio... eg, is it out by 100 rpms across the board, or by much more at high rpms than at low rpms? I should check....

Simple question:

Which one is right????
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 04:11 PM
  #2  
wpgrexx's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
From: not in winterpeg anymore
id like to know
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 04:15 PM
  #3  
silverrotor's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
My Idle displays a solid 750 while the S-AFC displays, very rapidly, any where form 739 - 760. Good question. I would trust a brand new rpm gauge (featured on the S-AFC) rather than a 14 yr old tach. Just my opinion.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 06:20 PM
  #4  
Scott 89t2's Avatar
SOLD THE RX-7!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
I'm pretty sure the afc is right.

my gap gets bigger as the rpms go up... idle is both same. off by like 200 at 2000 and like 3-400 at 4000

but it's aroud the same at redline. well when I shift using the tach the AFC max is around the same

Last edited by Scott 89t2; Oct 8, 2002 at 06:24 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 06:23 PM
  #5  
Piranha's Avatar
what 7
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 670
Likes: 1
From: Portage, MI
What does the SAFC run off of? The wire from the CAS going into the ECU? I have that wired into my turbo timer and there also is a discrepancy.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 07:38 PM
  #6  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Actually, I'm pretty sure they're both right. The S-AFC gets it's RPM signal from the CAS. The tach get's it's signal from the trailing coil. Therefore, two different RPM sources, two different readings. The trailing coil signal is more accurate than the CAS, so take the tach as the "real" RPM.

Of course, I could be wrong. I'd check the manual (ECU wiring diagram) but I'm too lazy right now.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 08:07 PM
  #7  
Bambam7's Avatar
Thread Starter
I came, I saw, I boosted.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Aaron... I know you know your stuff... but them both being right is a physical and logical impossiblity if they are reading 400 rpms apart!!!!!!
I know what you are saying... the source is off, not the display.
I'd still like to have concrete evidence though.... anyone have a tach to hook up under the hood or something to compare??

A freind of mine works at a tool shop, and they have a snesor that detects RPM on any shaft... it just looks like a timing gun that you aim at the rotating target, and it will tell you it's rpm's!! Not sure what method it uses... radar, optical, infrared, who knows, but that sounds pretty concrete to me....


Anyone install an aftermarket tach and seen a difference with the factory one?

Last edited by Bambam7; Oct 8, 2002 at 08:11 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2002 | 08:25 PM
  #8  
Rotorific's Avatar
I dont know a damn thing
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 1
From: Evans, Ga
Yes i have two friends with autometer tachs and they read about 3-400 rpms off so there is a pattern with the stock tach and aftermarket
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 12:01 AM
  #9  
Bambam7's Avatar
Thread Starter
I came, I saw, I boosted.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Which reiterates the question.... which is right?????

I stumbled across a strangely dark, yet very possible theory....
Does anyone think Mazda could have exaggerated the factory tachs for bragging rights, advertizing (8000 rpm redlines..) etc????
Not exactly unthinkable!!!
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 12:16 AM
  #10  
FC Drifter's Avatar
Damaged Little F*cker
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
From: High Point, North Carolina
no factory tachometer is 100% accurate. the AFC is the one that is right. ive done a little work on piston engines, using an external tach under the hood and the stock tach is always off. oh and the external tach was calibrated. some cosmic tool that the shop had, mega expensive.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2002 | 12:25 AM
  #11  
silverrotor's Avatar
Moderator
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,592
Likes: 5
From: Toronto, Corporate Canada
If the S-AFC gets Its signal from the Crank Angle Sensor and the Tachometer gets It's signal from the Trailing Coil Pack how are they both right? Additionally, If there Is two different RPM sources, two different readings, than which Is right? If the trailing coil signal is more accurate than the CAS, than why Is It suggested to take the tach as the "real" RPM? They both collaborate In unision. I would think something Is not displaying correctly.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2002 | 11:58 PM
  #12  
von's Avatar
von
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 1
From: sandiego, ca
cant believe this thread died. Mabey I can bring light to someting... At 8000rpms your sopose to be going 140mph I think according to a miata calculator. You can find any speed or gear ratio using it. 23inch tires 4.1 final and 2.00 fourth gear ratio you will be doing 140 or around thier at 8000 in fourth. My tacks rpm and speed are dead on but mabey their both related? anyways at 8000 rpm my S-AFC reads 7500 rpms.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2002 | 12:15 AM
  #13  
Scott 89t2's Avatar
SOLD THE RX-7!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
it's just digital vs. analog. new tech vs old tech...
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2002 | 12:28 AM
  #14  
zenkiFC's Avatar
Danger to Manifold
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Havelock, NC
i thought i was the only one w/ this problem! the difference between the two in my car isn't always the same though.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2002 | 01:56 AM
  #15  
Bambam7's Avatar
Thread Starter
I came, I saw, I boosted.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Von... same for me... a negligable amount of difference in the low end, but around 500 rpms difference at redline!!
On the stock tach I don't get 140 mph untill about 8500 rpms.... next time I hit that speed I'll look at the S-AFC tach....

PS. Where is the miata calculator?
Reply
Old May 5, 2003 | 12:12 PM
  #16  
chris_stampe's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Spearfish, SD
My aftermarket tach is slightly faster than my stock (300 or so rpms) and so is my turbo timer. I get one signal from the trailing coil, which is the same as the stock tach and one from the leading coils output. And both the aftermarket tachs are the same signal. This leads me to conclude that the stock tach is just slightly inaccurate.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
streetlegal?
New Member RX-7 Technical
13
Mar 17, 2022 02:46 PM
Thor 18
Interior / Exterior / Audio
4
Sep 13, 2015 08:39 PM
Coolant_Leak
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
Aug 30, 2015 11:18 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.