2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
View Poll Results: What will happen to the price of our cars?
The price will not change one bit on either Generation
10
16.67%
People will remember about the RX-7, Rotary, and buy ever RX-7 for sale. Turning the RX-7 into a honda civic
3
5.00%
The price will rise, but the car wil not become a rice magnet
19
31.67%
The price will go down. On all the Generations
28
46.67%
Voters: 60. You may not vote on this poll

RX-7's in the Future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 04:58 PM
  #1  
j a r o d's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 228
Likes: 16
From: Denver
RX-7's in the Future

When the new RX-8 comes out what will happed the the prive of the FC's? And the FD's?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 05:38 PM
  #2  
InfiniIIIREX's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Pentagon City
Lets all hope the 7 never becomes a rice magnet.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 05:47 PM
  #3  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
These things will end up being junked due to the inefficient design...
I've just read that the U.S. federal government is looking to up CAFE minimums - CAFE controls how fuel efficient cars need to be in the U.S.&nbsp An increase over the next 5 years would peg at 37mpg in 2014!&nbsp You think the rotary engine can be that fuel efficient???

Scrappage laws abound in the lawmakers eyes.&nbsp There was a bill that got scrapped that would require mandatory scrappage of vehicles 15 years or older, but it got resurrected within another bill - damn laymakers...



-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 06:00 PM
  #4  
j a r o d's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 228
Likes: 16
From: Denver
So these cars arent fuel efficient?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 06:03 PM
  #5  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Compared to multi-valve OHC pistons engines - not even close.&nbsp 4-cylinder, 16-valve, SOHC and DOHC piston engines easily make over 20-25mpg even pounded around town!&nbsp These engines break 40mpg on freeway driving.&nbsp A rotary engine cannot even come close to these numbers; I doubt the new MSP-RE in the RX-8 can even come close...


-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 07:24 PM
  #6  
InfiniIIIREX's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Pentagon City
Originally posted by j a r o d
So these cars arent fuel efficient?
Your kidding right? They are like two-stroke engines, they don't even burn off all the fuel. Thats why we get the flames.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 07:28 PM
  #7  
FEDREX's Avatar
"Just Looking".......
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
From: Treasure Coast, FL
Originally posted by RETed
CAFE controls how fuel efficient cars need to be in the U.S.&nbsp An increase over the next 5 years would peg at 37mpg in 2014!&nbsp You think the rotary engine can be that fuel efficient???
-Ted
It doesn't need to be since CAFE is Corporate Average Fuel Economy.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 07:29 PM
  #8  
j a r o d's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 228
Likes: 16
From: Denver
Originally posted by InfiniIIIREX

Your kidding right? They are like two-stroke engines, they don't even burn off all the fuel. Thats why we get the flames.
So im gunna be paying $100+ a week for fuel? or what?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 09:04 PM
  #9  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally posted by FEDREX
It doesn't need to be since CAFE is Corporate Average Fuel Economy.
That's right...which means that all the other cars Mazda produces has to even be MORE fuel efficient to keep the rotary cars in production.&nbsp Unless Mazda is going to relegate the rotary vehicles to very limited production numbers (I don't think they can afford it), keeping the rotary alive is next to impossible.&nbsp You think the rest of Mazda's fleet is going to average 50mpg+???

I think the rotary engine, even with the MSP-RE, will barely able to hit 20-25mpg.&nbsp This means all the other cars gotta be able to hit 40+mpg???&nbsp I find this hard to believe from a lowly 4th tier Japan automaker...



-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 09:24 PM
  #10  
menace's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: NZ, Auckland
comon ted be an optimist...

im all sad now.... and afraid tht nz will copy ur laws...
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 09:35 PM
  #11  
JumpyRoo's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
From: Chicago area
The Renesis engine is the most fuel efficient rotary yet. Mazda *is* aware of US fuel laws. Why? Two reasons: They have Ford on their rotary department now everywhere they turn (The RX-1 never reached production, and the RX-7 doesn't distribute in the US cuz of Ford), and they are made in JAPAN, the original home of fuel economy!

Furthermore, Mazda designed a hydrogen cell engine. It's a rotary engine. And this was done in 1991...
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2002 | 09:38 PM
  #12  
j a r o d's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 228
Likes: 16
From: Denver
JumpyRoo, you have restored my confidence in these cars... thank you

hrrmm..over 100 views, and less than 15 votes.. pssh.

Last edited by j a r o d; Mar 29, 2002 at 10:09 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 12:39 AM
  #13  
BlackSport0187's Avatar
Stay Tuned
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
From: OR
Thumbs up They'll find a way

Mazda engineers have brought the rotary engine this far, and the sky is the limit. A new crew of 47 rotary warriors will take the torch and bring the rotary along it's evolutionary path. Fuel efficency can be achieved with the rotary engine, it will and can be done.

Just you wait and see,
Ike
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 12:44 AM
  #14  
stickgoat's Avatar
AE whore nomore
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: Cola, SC
I'd wager that the price won't change much. The RX-7 enthusiasts are likely to stay right where they are... Sure the RX-8 may have a newer, more "efficient" rotary, but with the value difference between a new car and one that has been out of production (in the US anyway) since '95...I doubt the 8 will have too much of an impact on the 7.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 03:18 AM
  #15  
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
The fuel efficiency of the RX-8 is supposed to be significantly better than the RX-7. Plus, 250 hp for natural aspiration in a rotary engine that is smaller than a 13B? Sounds like progress to me!
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 01:16 PM
  #16  
rico05's Avatar
WTB S5 N/A FC
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tx
Because of the new trend in car designs, the 1st and 2nd gen will fade out, much like the RX-2 and 4 did. Also, because of the RX-8, ricers like to get their grubby little hands on newer machines. American manufacturer's will discontinue making parts for the 7, and we will have to go dircetly to Japan for parts. We, gentlemen, are the last of a dying breed. Enjoy it while ya can, cuz in 5 years, the 2nd gen will be a memory. WHich is good, cuz they will be even more of a sleeper!!!!! MUHWAHWAHWAHAHAHAHA!!
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 04:55 PM
  #17  
Agent_D's Avatar
rawr
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 1
From: Silver City, NM
well i know all the RX-7's ive ran with a full exhaust i get 29-33mpg on the highway with and in town i average 20-24mpg, i dont see that as bad at all, the restrictive stock exhaust is what kills our fuel mileage.

mind you im getting this type of fuel mileage with my 5.12 gears i got a little better in the black FC i had with stock gearing
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 05:05 PM
  #18  
BlackSport0187's Avatar
Stay Tuned
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
From: OR
I have a new exhaust system from the manifold back. I have a downpipe, presilencer, and high flow cat that flows to a custom cat-back to single muffler. All the way through the diameter is 2.5 inches. But, I still get 12-15mpg. Is the manifold really screwing me that much or possibly my O2 sensor? Where is the O2 sensor by the way?

Thanks,
Ike
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 05:07 PM
  #19  
Agent_D's Avatar
rawr
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 1
From: Silver City, NM
none of my cars have had the o2 sensor hooked up, i supposed i would get better mileage if it was lol

i dont know how restrictive the stock manifold is
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 06:26 PM
  #20  
SoloIIdrift's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Originally posted by Agent_D
well i know all the RX-7's ive ran with a full exhaust i get 29-33mpg on the highway with and in town i average 20-24mpg, i dont see that as bad at all, the restrictive stock exhaust is what kills our fuel mileage.

mind you im getting this type of fuel mileage with my 5.12 gears i got a little better in the black FC i had with stock gearing
Where did you get your 5.12 gears? This an N/A? Did you put them in a stock N/A LSD rear end?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 12:03 AM
  #21  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Originally posted by mguire
The fuel efficiency of the RX-8 is supposed to be significantly better than the RX-7. Plus, 250 hp for natural aspiration in a rotary engine that is smaller than a 13B? Sounds like progress to me!
Uh, what are you smoking?&nbsp The new MSP-RE should be very close to the same "displacement" as the old 13B's.

The more horspower comes from the higher redline.&nbsp All the other 13B's can do that if you wanna run above 9kRPM.



-Ted
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 01:00 AM
  #22  
HOZZMANRX7's Avatar
Driving RX7's since 1979
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,096
Likes: 9
From: So Cal where the OC/LA/SB counties meet
Thumbs up Mazda *is* aware of US fuel laws and counter point....

Do you really think Ford/Mazda would go through all the start up expense to market a $30,000 +/- car that will be labled a Gas Guzzler from day one? I don't think so.

And as a counter point to all you nay sayers



To make the RX8 marketable, Ford/Mazda is going to have to put on a serious ad campaign to sell the mass public on the virtues of a Wankle. I put out a post with this thought earlier this week (is that what sprung this poll? )

Anyway, if Mazda/Ford is successful in raising this awareness, then the resale value of all our Rex's will benefit. What I've saw at the LA Auto Show, Mazda seems to be building their ad campaign on a historical evolution of Wankle cars starting with the Cosmo. You can bet the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Gen will get exposure. And, how often does a 16-22, 15-10, or 9-7 year old car get fresh face on TV in any manner.

AND, no Convertable RX8's (at least not yet). So, if you get sold on a Wankle and you want to get your hair dirty driving a Wankle car, I'm betting a good clean 2nd Gen Vert at least will see a bit of appreciation. At least if/until the "Cosmo 21" mentioned in Aprils R&T gets a go as a pop top. And, with apologies to RX7 faithful, I'm still drooling at that prospect.

Last edited by HOZZMANRX7; Mar 31, 2002 at 01:06 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 01:02 AM
  #23  
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
I must be smoking your exhaust fumes!

Sure, you can get up to 300 HP out of a good PP, but that's going a bit peaky, wont pass emissions or idle well, and gets poor gas milage. I've never heard of getting 250 HP out of a 13B NA without porting, regardless of redline. The Rx-8 has a full race intake port with a side exhaust port, which means no port timing overlap, hence the good idle, broad power band, and "improved" gas milage. That's progress, isn't it?

-Eric
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 02:54 AM
  #24  
prmazdarx7's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: houston
is it just me or you guys forgot about this

remeber wankle was used as a hydrogen once????
that should clear up some of the concerns about air pollution nad if ford has the nice brain to think about it make it hydrogen again and play with it to get better miles per hyrogen hehe what other engine you know that can use it???
so this is the window of oprtunity
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 09:44 AM
  #25  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
I guess you haven't seen the FSAE papers on the MSP-RE.&nbsp It barely does 30mpg.&nbsp That's not good enough if those proposed CAFE standards are passed.&nbsp CAFE is pushing for close to 40mpg - that's a huge jump.&nbsp What is Mazda going to do?&nbsp Lighten the chassis more?



-Ted
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM.