Rising RPM exhaust manifold
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 104
From: Wilmington, DE
Rising RPM exhaust manifold
Oh my lord look at this piece.... Rising RPM
Does anyone here have one? Thoughts? Concerns? spool characteristics compared to a long divided header? The price is pretty high....I'll probably be buying one though




Does anyone here have one? Thoughts? Concerns? spool characteristics compared to a long divided header? The price is pretty high....I'll probably be buying one though




If I had to guess a machine does all the work...the hours went into the CAD design..
It's definitely unique! I probably wouldn't give up my twinscroll manifold for it. Having said that, I would love to see a a dyno comparison using this manifold against a twinscroll keeping everything the same and see how well this manifold stacks up.
It's definitely unique! I probably wouldn't give up my twinscroll manifold for it. Having said that, I would love to see a a dyno comparison using this manifold against a twinscroll keeping everything the same and see how well this manifold stacks up.
it was just recently released and built to order so i think it'll be a while till se see one with a dyno. maybe a group buy? any one interested in setting that up?
id like one in the future! sexy as hell!
id like one in the future! sexy as hell!
Looks like a great piece; they make quality products. I do think it should have been divided though/made it like the S5 stock manifold.
It probably wouldn't take much for them to change it.
It probably wouldn't take much for them to change it.
Trending Topics
Everything from RisingRPM has been top notch. I wouldn't second guess the quality of any products from him. If you have any doubts, send him a message on twitter. He usually responds within a day or two.
Probably fewer than you think.
Note that all the "curved" exterior parts were left as fairly rough step cuts, that is a timesaver (compare to interior curves where more time was spent because it matters).
Also, given the proper equipment (which they probably have) you can make some pretty aggressive cuts in aluminum.
It would also depend on how many axis their machine operates on.
If removal of the billet and refixturing is required, that would significantly increase the time.
I'd guess somewhere around 1-2 hours, I hope someone more knowledgeable chimes in...
Note that all the "curved" exterior parts were left as fairly rough step cuts, that is a timesaver (compare to interior curves where more time was spent because it matters).
Also, given the proper equipment (which they probably have) you can make some pretty aggressive cuts in aluminum.
It would also depend on how many axis their machine operates on.
If removal of the billet and refixturing is required, that would significantly increase the time.
I'd guess somewhere around 1-2 hours, I hope someone more knowledgeable chimes in...
Probably fewer than you think.
Note that all the "curved" exterior parts were left as fairly rough step cuts, that is a timesaver (compare to interior curves where more time was spent because it matters).
Also, given the proper equipment (which they probably have) you can make some pretty aggressive cuts in aluminum.
It would also depend on how many axis their machine operates on.
If removal of the billet and refixturing is required, that would significantly increase the time.
I'd guess somewhere around 1-2 hours, I hope someone more knowledgeable chimes in...
Note that all the "curved" exterior parts were left as fairly rough step cuts, that is a timesaver (compare to interior curves where more time was spent because it matters).
Also, given the proper equipment (which they probably have) you can make some pretty aggressive cuts in aluminum.
It would also depend on how many axis their machine operates on.
If removal of the billet and refixturing is required, that would significantly increase the time.
I'd guess somewhere around 1-2 hours, I hope someone more knowledgeable chimes in...
Or, just weld the divider in.
Last edited by user 893453465346; Jul 3, 2013 at 10:46 PM.
I think the benefit here is you can still run your emissions equipment but not on a stock ecu. Wonder if you can make the haltech run all emissions equipment. On my To4B with HKS log manifold I didn't run no emissions so the haltech was very easy to wire up.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,796
Likes: 3,210
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
the ACV only uses two solenoids, so its 2 more wires...
This would pointless, it wouldn't be providing any benefits and might actually do more harm than good as the exhaust gases would have to merge to be divided. Kind of like having a y-pipe in you're exhaust when it's not needed. It's either twinscroll or its not. The point of twinscroll is so that each rotor's exhaust pulses are feeding the divided housing in the turbo for faster response time.
But the factory gasket is what it is so, the obvious solution is to make your own gasket. Shouldn't be too hard to whip up a metallic one if you have the ability to make the manifold.
As stated above, it would only interest someone that wants a stock looking set-up and using a lot of stock components.
Or,as I said before, bend one up and weld it in.
Last edited by user 893453465346; Jul 8, 2013 at 09:20 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DC5Daniel
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
60
Aug 11, 2016 10:00 PM








