2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

removing 6pi system on an s5.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 03:47 PM
  #1  
DEZERTE's Avatar
Thread Starter
777** The Anti-rice
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
removing 6pi system on an s5.

Im going to remove the 6pi system on my s5 na. I already have the exten manifold off, and i was wondering if i should remove the VDI as well as the actuators and the sleeves?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 06:50 PM
  #2  
DEZERTE's Avatar
Thread Starter
777** The Anti-rice
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
bump tump
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 09:26 PM
  #3  
DEZERTE's Avatar
Thread Starter
777** The Anti-rice
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
ill just leave the VDI in. After reading the FSM some, it doesnt look like any good can ceom from removing it
correct me if im wrong.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 10:22 PM
  #4  
Tofuball's Avatar
Jesus is the Messiah
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
Leave the VDI in! Wow! Do NOT pull out the VDI.

If you want to remove the 'six' (aux) ports, I suggest pulling off the lower manifold and pulling out the rods, sleaves, and acutators. Then knock out the little brass inserts.

Tap the hole left over and drive a bolt into it. Then sand the bolt down.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 12:40 AM
  #5  
DEZERTE's Avatar
Thread Starter
777** The Anti-rice
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
lol, i suck at cars and the web.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 12:47 AM
  #6  
Tofuball's Avatar
Jesus is the Messiah
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
Nah, you're doing great, your car still runs, right?

And the web? You're actually using punctuation, and from the posts of yours I've seen, you dont randomly explode into a flaming ball of hate spewing out endless droves of misinformaition. . . like some people . . . yeh . . .

So, thats a plus!
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 03:12 AM
  #7  
DEZERTE's Avatar
Thread Starter
777** The Anti-rice
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Originally posted by Tofuball
Nah, you're doing great, your car still runs, right?

And the web? You're actually using punctuation, and from the posts of yours I've seen, you dont randomly explode into a flaming ball of hate spewing out endless droves of misinformaition. . . like some people . . . yeh . . .

So, thats a plus!
Lol, thanks,
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 08:38 AM
  #8  
Tofuball's Avatar
Jesus is the Messiah
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
I've been asked in a PM to explain my reasoning behind the VDI, so here is a very bastardized explination.

The aux ports and the VDI are both there to broden the torque curve.

The VDI (Variable Dynamic Intake) works by 'changing' the intake runner's size to become 'shorter' at very high RPM. (If you don't know how that actually works, I can explain that). The runners on the RX-7 are very, very long in comparison to most cars. The reason is to help with low end torque. Long runners are better for low end, and short(er) ones are better for high end.

The VDI cylender, if removed entirely, will leave a very very bad area for flow inside the chamber.

The aux ports work in a different way, they effectively 'advance the cam timing' of a rotary engine, as the port is farther into the intake 'stroke' (Kind of like a higher lift valve on a piston engine)

Dyno numbers report that your results are not typical at all. On modified cars, people dyno them with either of the ports completely open, then completely closed, then they tune them to open at the given RPM where the line intercects.

I personally noticed a 1-2MPG gain on the highway, along with some part-throttle torque, when I forced my then stuck ports open ports to the closed position. I have since repaired the whole system on my car.

If you want to remove both of those systems, I reccomend just replacing the whole intake with one that is shorter and less convoluted, you will notice a bigger gain in high end without much more loss in low end.

If I'm wrong, somone please correct me, but this is a simpler version of my understanding of the two systems.

Last edited by Tofuball; Jun 5, 2004 at 08:41 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 10:20 AM
  #9  
DEZERTE's Avatar
Thread Starter
777** The Anti-rice
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Nice post! Thanks
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 06:11 PM
  #10  
Tofuball's Avatar
Jesus is the Messiah
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
Originally posted by Tofuball
Dyno numbers report that your results are not typical at all.
I was responding to a PM originally, thats why that line is in there. :O

Sorry about that, just ignore it :-p
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bryancmatthews
Power FC Forum
14
Oct 5, 2015 08:49 PM
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
Sep 5, 2015 02:13 PM
befarrer
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
Sep 4, 2015 08:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.