2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Recommended lightweight flywheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 6, 2020 | 07:38 PM
  #1  
lespaul166's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 190
Likes: 13
From: Michigan
Recommended lightweight flywheel?

Looking at lightweight flywheels in an attempt to improve my 40-80 downshift times. Right now the car rips off the line, but if you downshift into 2md at 40 and hit it it goes nowhere, just slowly creeps up in speed all lethargically. This obviously isn’t very conducive to road racing, and I’ve heard that an aluminum flywheel will help with pulling out of corners. Does anyone have a recommended brand?

Also are there any significant benefits to running lightened rotors and e shaft or am I just throwing away $1500 at that point?
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 08:26 AM
  #2  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
i've usually used the Racing beat stuff, the steel one was like how the car should have been from the factory, and then the aluminum one is more racey.

i have an ACT now, but it wasn't much lighter than the stocker, so you can't tell
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 09:20 AM
  #3  
lespaul166's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 190
Likes: 13
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
i've usually used the Racing beat stuff, the steel one was like how the car should have been from the factory, and then the aluminum one is more racey.

i have an ACT now, but it wasn't much lighter than the stocker, so you can't tell
wow really? I’ve heard from some people that it’s the most dramatic change they’ve done to their 7 besides porting it and exhaust. Others say there is absolutely no reason to have a lightweight flywheel because reality is you’re shaving such a minuscule amount of weight off your driveline that’s it’s just a giant scam.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 09:23 AM
  #4  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
the stock one is too heavy, IMO, and going from too heavy to slightly too light with the AL is a big change. the steel one though feels like its the one the car should have had from the factory.

Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 12:34 PM
  #5  
lespaul166's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 190
Likes: 13
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
the stock one is too heavy, IMO, and going from too heavy to slightly too light with the AL is a big change. the steel one though feels like its the one the car should have had from the factory.
So for a tracked car a 9 Lb flywheel should be golden? I agree, the revs drop brutally slow with the factory flywheel, to the point where it actually feels like a handicap just doing a nice Sunday drive. I’m not at all worried about launching off the line because once I get going at the track there’s no looking back, I’m planning on keeping it above 3.5k the whole time.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 01:19 PM
  #6  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
Originally Posted by lespaul166
wow really? I’ve heard from some people that it’s the most dramatic change they’ve done to their 7 besides porting it and exhaust. Others say there is absolutely no reason to have a lightweight flywheel because reality is you’re shaving such a minuscule amount of weight off your driveline that’s it’s just a giant scam.
I can only speak for the RB steel one that I have but I really like it. Also even though at 17lbs total including the counter weight it is only 5lbs lighter than stock the difference in inertia is actually more than the weight difference suggest due to the stock ones weight is at the outer edge vs. the aftermarket ones are at the center. I was leary of the aluminum on a street car so I went with the steel, though I'm still curious about the aluminum. I thought it was well worth it.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 01:44 PM
  #7  
lespaul166's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
 
Joined: Apr 2020
Posts: 190
Likes: 13
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by Dak
I can only speak for the RB steel one that I have but I really like it. Also even though at 17lbs total including the counter weight it is only 5lbs lighter than stock the difference in inertia is actually more than the weight difference suggest due to the stock ones weight is at the outer edge vs. the aftermarket ones are at the center. I was leary of the aluminum on a street car so I went with the steel, though I'm still curious about the aluminum. I thought it was well worth it.
I think I’m probably going to go aluminum. Though with these poly mounts the launch shudder/vibration might literally kill me. Right now it feels like the cars going to explode. Probably gonna sell these and just go Mazda comp anyways. 2k+ is like a gift from god, 1.5-2k is like being in an especially violent massage chair.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 03:27 PM
  #8  
DC5Daniel's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,631
Likes: 89
From: Peachtree City, GA
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
i've usually used the Racing beat stuff, the steel one was like how the car should have been from the factory, and then the aluminum one is more racey.

i have an ACT now, but it wasn't much lighter than the stocker, so you can't tell
Originally Posted by Dak
I can only speak for the RB steel one that I have but I really like it. Also even though at 17lbs total including the counter weight it is only 5lbs lighter than stock the difference in inertia is actually more than the weight difference suggest due to the stock ones weight is at the outer edge vs. the aftermarket ones are at the center. I was leary of the aluminum on a street car so I went with the steel, though I'm still curious about the aluminum. I thought it was well worth it.
Does RB offer the lightweight steel for turbo models? I only saw for NA on their site.

Looks like Exedy has an option.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 03:40 PM
  #9  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,833
Likes: 3,232
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by DC5Daniel
Does RB offer the lightweight steel for turbo models? .
i know it was discontinued for something, i'm just not sure what.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2020 | 04:46 PM
  #10  
Dak's Avatar
Dak
Information Regurgitator
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 208
From: Sparta TN. United States
Originally Posted by DC5Daniel
Does RB offer the lightweight steel for turbo models? I only saw for NA on their site.

Looks like Exedy has an option.
Looks like they sell the Exedy as the steel option for the turbo. They say 13lbs. excluding the counter weight, so with the counterweight that's 17.25lbs. The same weight as their their steel one for the n/a. Says it's chrome moly steel as well.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2020 | 12:07 AM
  #11  
WANKfactor's Avatar
Instrument Of G0D.
Tenured Member: 10 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 997
From: omnipresent
Check out ACT too. When i bought mine they were very cost effective and had quite a few choices.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2020 | 01:18 AM
  #12  
Doc Holaday's Avatar
Snow EH?
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon SK Canada
I'm running a Fidanza aluminum flywheel on my fc TII with a spec stage2.5 clutch. It definitely takes a touch more throttle to get moving but other than that its been a great setup for street driving and autocross.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alex1206
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
43
Aug 29, 2010 03:23 AM
RX7Junkman
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
8
Jul 18, 2006 08:28 PM
SF@Rx7
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
20
Jul 22, 2005 09:48 PM
Qball
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
22
Jun 27, 2005 08:02 PM
bottlejockey
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
4
Jan 2, 2003 08:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 PM.