2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Rebuild Refuses to Hold Idle (PICS)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 12:45 PM
  #1  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Unhappy Rebuild Refuses to Hold Idle (PICS)

After hours and hours of trouble shooting I finally got my rebuilt 87' Turbo II to start!!!
Problem is, it won't hold idle. In neutral it will bounce from 800 (where it sounds like it's about to die) up to 1200 then drop down again. once in a while it will hold at 1000-1100 for about 2-3 minutes, then it's back to bouncing again.

If it's in gear you can forget about it, the second you take your foot off the gas, the RPM's start dropping, and don't stop until it dies. This is with the clutch fully depressed mind you.

for a more in-depth explaination of what I've done so far please check out:
https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-generation-specific-1986-1992-17/t2-rebuild-turns-over-but-wont-start-576866/

Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated
.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #2  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Originally Posted by Karack
for how many hours this engine has been idling i would say it should start holding an idle on it's own by now, as i said i haven't had any issues with my rebuilds idling even a few minutes after starting the first time unless the rotor housings were severely thrashed it should run fairly strong right off.

the idle screw should be doing something or you have a leak somewhere or the BAC is completely blocked off internally somehow. if you have a camera try taking some pics of the intake piping, BAC and engine in general to help us see what is going on in there. my bet is the BAC line to the turbo-intercooler elbow is either missing, cracked or not hooked up completely causing the leak.
Total, this engine has probably ran for 10- 15 hours since the rebuild.

As requested, here are some pictures to aid in the diagnosis:

ACV with proper block off plate. Split air hose was MIA so there was a hole where it should connect. I rigged up a lil something to plug it.


The BAC, doesn't appear to be anyting wrong on the outside...


The EGR. When I got it, there was nothing attached to that nipple, so I capped it.
That hose w/ the blue dotted line comes from somewhere between the UIM and LIM right behind the EGR, it was capped w/ a screw (not by me)


The FPR if I'm not mistaken. Also had nothing attached to that downward pointing nipple, not sure if I should cap it or not though


Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #3  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
the FPR should be attached to the port on the LIM and could be part of the issue, without vacuum on the FPR it will be pushing 38PSI vs the idling spec of 29 PSI which can be causing flooding issues. another thing to check is the turbo intake duct, they love to crack where they meet the turbo and cause stalling issues.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #4  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Few more pics

A picture of the area in question:


A little diagram of the vaccum hoses (I think something may be wrong here):
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 01:13 PM
  #5  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Originally Posted by Karack
the FPR should be attached to the port on the LIM and could be part of the issue, without vacuum on the FPR it will be pushing 38PSI vs the idling spec of 29 PSI which can be causing flooding issues. another thing to check is the turbo intake duct, they love to crack where they meet the turbo and cause stalling issues.
Is there a diagram showing this port on the LIM? and could I connect the two w/ o removing the UIM?

I will spray the hell out of the TID w/ some carb cleaner once I get it to idle again (hopefully right now )
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #6  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
this thread should give you a better idea of how things should be hooked up, that spider web of vacuum lines looks scary...

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ight=fresh+air

the FPR should lead to a nipple towards the middle inside of the lower intake manifold.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #7  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
I'll take a look at that thread

PHP Code:
the FPR should lead to a nipple towards the middle inside of the lower intake manifold. 
In that case, I think either the blue dotted line, or the other one that comes from between the manifolds may just bey the FPR line. I guess I'll have to try each one on and see what kind of results I get.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 01:00 AM
  #8  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Update:
I called the shop back and the guy reccomended that I take out the NGK plugs and replace them with some cheap normal plugs for a 94 Nissan Sentra. I was skeptical to say the least, since they didn't look like they would fit properly but I was out of options and ideas.

Surprise surprise, it actually started (after about 4-7 seconds of cranking) and it's started every time since.

I just drove 270 miles on them and they seem to be holding up just fine. The drive also seemed to help w/ compression and startup. Although it still won't idle while in gear, or even in nuetral if the car is moving
I've sprayed all over the place for vaccum leaks and none seem to be present.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 01:07 AM
  #9  
Mx6-Rx7 Addict's Avatar
Brap Brap Brap
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Those plugs are not the right plug for the rotary motor. get those things out of the car right now. get some new NGK's.

-Justin
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 01:31 AM
  #10  
eriksseven's Avatar
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by sharingan 19
Update:
I called the shop back and the guy reccomended that I take out the NGK plugs and replace them with some cheap normal plugs for a 94 Nissan Sentra. I was skeptical to say the least, since they didn't look like they would fit properly but I was out of options and ideas.

Surprise surprise, it actually started (after about 4-7 seconds of cranking) and it's started every time since.

I just drove 270 miles on them and they seem to be holding up just fine. The drive also seemed to help w/ compression and startup. Although it still won't idle while in gear, or even in nuetral if the car is moving
I've sprayed all over the place for vaccum leaks and none seem to be present.
Have you set your timing and TPS since rebuilding?
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 01:39 AM
  #11  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Karack
this thread should give you a better idea of how things should be hooked up, that spider web of vacuum lines looks scary...

https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ight=fresh+air

the FPR should lead to a nipple towards the middle inside of the lower intake manifold.
NZconvertible is gonna love that you highlighted 'fresh air' haha.

also to the original poster, misrouted vacuum lines can be as bad or worse than completely unhooked/leaking ones. i suggest you restore them all to stock or completely remove emissions and follow the diagam in the thread karack linked. the FPR definitely needs to be connected to a 'fresh air' source, along with the primary and secondary injectors.

another thing, the only reason those plugs worked is because your old ones were probably shot.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #12  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
Originally Posted by Mx6-Rx7 Addict
Those plugs are not the right plug for the rotary motor. get those things out of the car right now. get some new NGK's.

-Justin
I realize they are not the right plugs and I would feel more comfortable w/ the proper plugs (hence my apprehension to the idea in the first place) However the NGK's are so prone to fouling/flooding it's ridiculous. After I tried (unsuccessfully) to start the car 2 or 3 times I'd have to remove them and clean them. With these wrong plugs I was able to crank it till it got started, and even when it stalled, I was able to start it again .

I will put NGK's back in, just doesn't look like it'll be immediately


Originally Posted by eriksseven
Have you set your timing and TPS since rebuilding?
No I have not set/checked the TPS, it's next on my list of things to do. Don't I have to remove the UIM? If so I could do it when I check/ reroute the vac lines.[/

Originally Posted by NOPR
...also to the original poster, misrouted vacuum lines can be as bad or worse than completely unhooked/leaking ones. i suggest you restore them all to stock or completely remove emissions and follow the diagam in the thread karack linked. the FPR definitely needs to be connected to a 'fresh air' source, along with the primary and secondary injectors.

another thing, the only reason those plugs worked is because your old ones were probably shot.
I'd like to completely remove all emissions but I'm not sure what has already been removed. I know I need block off plates for the EGR and split air valve and sub zero start assist. I'll see what else needs to be removed/ capped when I connect the FPR to the right line.

I plan on following the diagram to reroute the vac lines. Do I need a new gasket if I remove the UIM?

Perhaps my old plugs did crap out, but even when they were new, they would have to be cleaned every couple of cranks. It just seems like the design is very prone to failure. My question is, if normal plugs will work why would mazda go w/ this strange plug instead?

Last edited by sharingan 19; Sep 13, 2006 at 11:45 AM. Reason: add info
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #13  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by NOPR
NZconvertible is gonna love that you highlighted 'fresh air' haha.

also to the original poster, misrouted vacuum lines can be as bad or worse than completely unhooked/leaking ones. i suggest you restore them all to stock or completely remove emissions and follow the diagam in the thread karack linked. the FPR definitely needs to be connected to a 'fresh air' source, along with the primary and secondary injectors.

another thing, the only reason those plugs worked is because your old ones were probably shot.

lol, i couldn't think of any keywords that were bringing that thread up.

the FPR actually needs to be hooked up to a vacuum/pressure source, which is what the middle nipple on the LIM is, if it still isn't hooked up i would start there, as i said it is pushing too much fuel if it isn't hooked up.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #14  
NOPR's Avatar
Rotary Apprentice
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Karack
the FPR actually needs to be hooked up to a vacuum/pressure source, which is what the middle nipple on the LIM is, if it still isn't hooked up i would start there, as i said it is pushing too much fuel if it isn't hooked up.
woops, you're right, how quickly i forget.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2006 | 12:50 AM
  #15  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
You bring up a good point, fortunately my fuel cut switch seems like it should do the job long enough for me to get a chance to take off the UIM and fix that vaccum mess.

Also, the engine now idles at 700-800 once warm . I know I haven't fixed the vaccum line problem yet so is this new idle be due to the engine gaining compression? or what?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
incubuseva
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Sep 3, 2015 12:37 PM
rxmiles
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
Aug 24, 2015 02:07 PM
ncds_fc
New Member RX-7 Technical
1
Aug 15, 2015 10:06 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 AM.