2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

RB question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-04, 01:03 AM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
midnightseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RB question

im planning on getting and RB cat-back for my 91 GXL.

most ppl say its the best exhaust available for the N/A without being too loud.

ppl also mention its quite heavy...so my question: does the weight of this system cancel out the performance benefits in HP gain?

thanks,
Carlos
Old 04-21-04, 01:03 AM
  #2  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
midnightseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RB question

im planning on getting and RB cat-back for my 91 GXL.

most ppl say its the best exhaust available for the N/A without being too loud.

ppl also mention its quite heavy...so my question: does the weight of this system cancel out the performance benefits in HP gain?

thanks,
Carlos
Old 04-21-04, 01:05 AM
  #3  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
midnightseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RB system Question

hi guys,

im planning on getting the RB system for my 91 GXL.

ppl have said that its quite a heavy....my quesion is: does the weight of this system cancel out the performance gains?

thanks,
Carlos
Old 04-21-04, 01:11 AM
  #4  
Rotartist

iTrader: (13)
 
RRTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Spring Hill TN 37174
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It is very HEAVY!!!! I had teh RB setup all the way from block to back, cut the mufflers off ans added stainless n1's....saved almost 16 lbs........but i don't know if it outwieghs the performance gains....
Old 04-21-04, 01:14 AM
  #5  
SUPERnaturally Aspirated

 
shiftnmadkwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no.
Old 04-21-04, 01:29 AM
  #6  
SOLD THE RX-7!

 
Scott 89t2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 7,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"might" be heavy compared to other aftermarket ones. but still way the hell lighter then the stock one....

well that's if you remove the cats... if it's only a cat back it'll probably just weigh the same as stock. and won't really add any power. most power is lost at the cats.

Last edited by Scott 89t2; 04-21-04 at 01:34 AM.
Old 04-21-04, 02:27 AM
  #7  
S4 now S6 soon...

 
FDreaming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bonney lake, WA
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no, not at all, not in the least bit, an none whatsoever.

That answer your question?

The stock exhuast is EXTREMELY restrictive and poorly designed, it's also quite heavy. Go from that to an extrememly well designed exuast that probably weighs less than stock, yeah it's worth it.
Old 04-21-04, 07:35 AM
  #8  
Senior Member

 
kiyoshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, you probably won't feel much power gain by stock ex-manifold+stock cat+ RB catback. I felt so when I was running on that setup.
Old 04-21-04, 09:44 AM
  #9  
SUPERnaturally Aspirated

 
shiftnmadkwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
will you feel the speed difference probably not
will the performance outweigh the weight yes

just make up for the weight by cutting out the krispy kremes
Old 04-21-04, 09:48 AM
  #10  
SUPERnaturally Aspirated

 
shiftnmadkwik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 337
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
will you feel the speed difference probably not
will the performance outweigh the weight yes

just make up for the weight by cutting out the krispy kremes
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
_Tones_
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
10
05-25-21 05:37 AM
Nosferatu
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
09-05-15 02:13 PM



Quick Reply: RB question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.