RACING BILLET FUEL COVER for FC
Trending Topics
#9
Turbo Swamp Thing
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: 195 Miles West of Bridgeport, WA
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by soulja77
well all true sports car have them... aka racing gas cap covers, like the 350z.
Wondering if anyone has added one to there FC
Wondering if anyone has added one to there FC
And I've never seen anyone have one on their FC.
#11
i am legendary
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by soulja77
well all true sports car have them... aka racing gas cap covers, like the 350z.
Wondering if anyone has added one to there FC
Wondering if anyone has added one to there FC
#12
kill it with BOOMSTICK!
Originally Posted by 1987RX7guy
Guess what the Rx-7 IS A SPORTS CAR. It doesn't need a ******* racing gas cap kiddo.
It is soooo true, the riciness(sp?) of it is blinding. Why do you need to put something gawdy and not complimentary to aerodynamics on a car that can already compete with the cars that do have them? I tell you why: It's the same reason all these little kids put it on their civics and stickers and all kinds of other **** on there with it. They're compensating for something that was never there in the first place. Want a hint? begins with a "P"
Potential (what'd you think i'd say? )
#13
I wish I was driving!
Originally Posted by 1987RX7guy
Guess what the Rx-7 IS A SPORTS CAR. It doesn't need a ******* racing gas cap kiddo.
Don't even get me started on "billet fuel door cap"...
Real race cars don't HAVE fuel caps. They run fuel cells.
#15
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and if you're talking about a replacement billet door... that'd just be completely ghey.
think about it... a rectangular silver thing on the side of the car.. ughhhh
think about it... a rectangular silver thing on the side of the car.. ughhhh
#16
Lives on the Forum
Everyone defines "sports car" intheir own way, so it's pointless to argue on this point.
For me it has to be rear drive, but ask Honda lovers and they'd disagree. Some would say it must be mid or rear engined. For some the only true sportscars are things like the Lotus Elise, for others it's Dodge Vipers and the sort.
For me it has to be rear drive, but ask Honda lovers and they'd disagree. Some would say it must be mid or rear engined. For some the only true sportscars are things like the Lotus Elise, for others it's Dodge Vipers and the sort.
#17
I wish I was driving!
Originally Posted by 1987RX7guy
Sports car
D. a small low car with a high-powered engine; usually seats two persons
Roadster
D. An open automobile having a single seat in the front for two
I wouldn't toss the CRX into sports car. Maybe compact car or sports compact.
D. a small low car with a high-powered engine; usually seats two persons
Roadster
D. An open automobile having a single seat in the front for two
I wouldn't toss the CRX into sports car. Maybe compact car or sports compact.
The CRX is high powered fpor its overall mass... about as much as the S4 N/A... The CRX has two seats. The CRX is about as low as an FC... yet you define it differently? At least I define myself through set standards and am realistic about the FC's intended design (GT).
You know, especially how the car competed almost exclusviely in the GTU class when backed by Mazda?
Anyone considering a $500-$2500 vehicle as a sports car is simply kidding themselves. If an 86 base is truly a sports car, then I feel sad for the defnition of the term.
#18
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by soulja77
well all true sports car have them... aka racing gas cap covers, like the 350z.
Wondering if anyone has added one to there FC
Wondering if anyone has added one to there FC
well i guess no ferrari's are sports cars,.. or any lotus's,.. nsx must not be a sports are either,.. or the mr2,... miatas either,.. damn i guess that leaves 350z's and Audi TT's and hyundai tiburan's as the only true sports cars,..
damn time to sell the FC and go buy a hyundai
or not...
#19
Rotary Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: California, Bay Area
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scathcart
Ha! Defining a sports car by a dictionary term.... a sports car has ALWAYS been defined as a convertible... is was only until the 90's that everyone emerged with a hardtop "sports car".
The CRX is high powered fpor its overall mass... about as much as the S4 N/A... The CRX has two seats. The CRX is about as low as an FC... yet you define it differently? At least I define myself through set standards and am realistic about the FC's intended design (GT).
You know, especially how the car competed almost exclusviely in the GTU class when backed by Mazda?
Anyone considering a $500-$2500 vehicle as a sports car is simply kidding themselves. If an 86 base is truly a sports car, then I feel sad for the defnition of the term.
The CRX is high powered fpor its overall mass... about as much as the S4 N/A... The CRX has two seats. The CRX is about as low as an FC... yet you define it differently? At least I define myself through set standards and am realistic about the FC's intended design (GT).
You know, especially how the car competed almost exclusviely in the GTU class when backed by Mazda?
Anyone considering a $500-$2500 vehicle as a sports car is simply kidding themselves. If an 86 base is truly a sports car, then I feel sad for the defnition of the term.
Also, Btw the rest of the world droped the whole has to be a convertable to be a sportscar thing about 10 years ago,... except the U.K,.. they seem to have tried to hang onto it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rx8volks
Canadian Forum
0
08-13-15 04:55 AM