2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Pulsation Damper Necessity or Not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2006 | 12:07 AM
  #1  
JDriftM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Progressive Rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 625
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
Pulsation Damper Necessity or Not?

I have read a lot of threads and there are some that say that you do and some that say you don't need a pulsation damper. I'm custom making new fuel rails and lines and wondered if I absolutely needed to have a pulsation damper?

Thanks to all that help.

J
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 12:45 AM
  #2  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
There are two schools of thought.

Pro PD= Fluid dynamics engineering says that they are required. You can have rail harmonics that can lead to a overly lean or overly rich situation at specific RPMs. Going lean at the wrong time could blow your motor. In addition without a PD, the soft lines and injectors take a much worse beating and may be subject to pre-mature failure.

Con PD = Some owners say they have been running thier cars without one with no problems that they are aware of. Often they claim the lack of a possibility of a leak outweighs the possibilty of problems outlined above.

So you will personally need to decide which one you want to go with. Without a engineering degree inf fluid dynamics and countless dyno time and access to modern test equipment, it is impossible to say which is right.

I personally believe that they are required on all fuel injected systems.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 12:34 PM
  #3  
JDriftM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Progressive Rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 625
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
Ok, thanks Icemark. Does anyone have pics of an aftermarket PD built into their custom fuel set up?

J
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 01:40 PM
  #4  
ericgrau's Avatar
Clean.
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
The fuel pulsation dampener was/is a major cause of car fires in the '86-'88 rx-7. So the '89 and later rx-7 got a much more reliable fuel pulsation dampener. From what I read you can cram one into an '86-'88 but it's tight. My local mechanic replaced my leaking FPD for $350 (probably not with a more reliable one).

At http://www.mazdatrix.com/c-pulsation.htm you can get a more replacement for $150.

Last edited by ericgrau; May 10, 2006 at 01:44 PM.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #5  
13bpower's Avatar
s4 for life
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 1
From: Oahu
I ran my old modified Turbo II without a PD for 2 years with no ill effects. Current owner still runs it that way and has seen no problems with it. I originally replaced a leaky PD on that Turbo II with a NEW one from Mazdatrix. The new one started leaking after 8 months! NO JOKE! It was banjo bolt time after that..... I wasen't about to spend another $135 on a "NEW" pulsation dampener.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #6  
rotorforce's Avatar
I'm back Bishes
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
I remove my PD's as a first priority well 2nd priority. (oil cooler lines get changed 1st)

I have never had any noticable issues without it and like Icemark said to some of us whatever ill effect it may have sure outways losing your cat in a fire.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 03:37 PM
  #7  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Take a look at this topic from the Archives: https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showthread.php?t=395021
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #8  
Apathy's Avatar
dAracIngPhaRmaCist
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale
My car burned... And I took it off. Now that I got a new swap (13b-re) I'm gonna get an aftermarket one.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 06:26 PM
  #9  
rotorforce's Avatar
I'm back Bishes
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Apathy
My car burned... And I took it off. Now that I got a new swap (13b-re) I'm gonna get an aftermarket one.
Your car burned after you took it off? Your FC was destined to light up like a match.
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 08:19 PM
  #10  
Innovation's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 668
Likes: 1
From: Winter Park, Florida
Hmm, fire or no fire! I would go with no fire! Mazda put it there for a reason. I replaced mine about 2 week's ago with no bad effects. Piece of mind= priceless.

Last edited by Innovation; May 10, 2006 at 08:48 PM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #11  
JDriftM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Progressive Rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 625
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, OH
RETed, my question now is for you. The parallel set up posted on your site, it does not show a PD, and I understand that it may not be needed, but for peace of mind, I would like to have one. Where in your parallel set up would the aftermarket PD go? Or in your opinion (Only RETed's) is it needed?

J
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #12  
MrFC3S's Avatar
ROTARD FOR LIFE!!!
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
i know someone told me how to reroute the pd to somewhere safer than the top of the engine(mike harrington from nc i think) but that sounds like a good idea. if you can reroute your oil filter in the bay, shouldnt be too hard for the pd
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #13  
Goofy's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: USA
I was under the impression that the parallel mod removes the need for the PD entirely.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 12:48 PM
  #14  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by Goofy
I was under the impression that the parallel mod removes the need for the PD entirely.
as I recall teds dual set up, uses two FPR. FPR will also work as PDs.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 01:09 PM
  #15  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
my take is ditch the thing unless you have a fat wallet.
Reply
Old May 12, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #16  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
Removing the PD IMO and most seasoned tuners is ignorance especially with the valued information on the net from manufacturers. if it was not for a reason don’t you think it would not be on the car?

Teds setup with that brand FPR has a built in PD but not very good one IMO. Has been known to fail.

I run a PD on each rail with a FPR. Only way for me. As you go to larger injectors you get more resence in the rail causing lean spikes. This is caused from the injector solenoid firing rapidly. Think of this as slaping your hand against the watter in the tub.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
17
Jun 3, 2024 03:25 PM
FC_DREAMS
General Rotary Tech Support
20
Sep 22, 2015 09:43 PM
Steelwheelz
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Sep 15, 2015 03:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.