2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Pulsation Damper Necessity or Not?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-06, 12:07 AM
  #1  
Progressive Rotorhead

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JDriftM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 622
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pulsation Damper Necessity or Not?

I have read a lot of threads and there are some that say that you do and some that say you don't need a pulsation damper. I'm custom making new fuel rails and lines and wondered if I absolutely needed to have a pulsation damper?

Thanks to all that help.

J
Old 05-10-06, 12:45 AM
  #2  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
There are two schools of thought.

Pro PD= Fluid dynamics engineering says that they are required. You can have rail harmonics that can lead to a overly lean or overly rich situation at specific RPMs. Going lean at the wrong time could blow your motor. In addition without a PD, the soft lines and injectors take a much worse beating and may be subject to pre-mature failure.

Con PD = Some owners say they have been running thier cars without one with no problems that they are aware of. Often they claim the lack of a possibility of a leak outweighs the possibilty of problems outlined above.

So you will personally need to decide which one you want to go with. Without a engineering degree inf fluid dynamics and countless dyno time and access to modern test equipment, it is impossible to say which is right.

I personally believe that they are required on all fuel injected systems.
Old 05-10-06, 12:34 PM
  #3  
Progressive Rotorhead

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JDriftM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 622
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok, thanks Icemark. Does anyone have pics of an aftermarket PD built into their custom fuel set up?

J
Old 05-10-06, 01:40 PM
  #4  
Clean.

iTrader: (1)
 
ericgrau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 2,521
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The fuel pulsation dampener was/is a major cause of car fires in the '86-'88 rx-7. So the '89 and later rx-7 got a much more reliable fuel pulsation dampener. From what I read you can cram one into an '86-'88 but it's tight. My local mechanic replaced my leaking FPD for $350 (probably not with a more reliable one).

At http://www.mazdatrix.com/c-pulsation.htm you can get a more replacement for $150.

Last edited by ericgrau; 05-10-06 at 01:44 PM.
Old 05-10-06, 01:46 PM
  #5  
s4 for life

 
13bpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oahu
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I ran my old modified Turbo II without a PD for 2 years with no ill effects. Current owner still runs it that way and has seen no problems with it. I originally replaced a leaky PD on that Turbo II with a NEW one from Mazdatrix. The new one started leaking after 8 months! NO JOKE! It was banjo bolt time after that..... I wasen't about to spend another $135 on a "NEW" pulsation dampener.
Old 05-10-06, 01:59 PM
  #6  
I'm back Bishes

 
rotorforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remove my PD's as a first priority well 2nd priority. (oil cooler lines get changed 1st)

I have never had any noticable issues without it and like Icemark said to some of us whatever ill effect it may have sure outways losing your cat in a fire.
Old 05-10-06, 03:37 PM
  #7  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Take a look at this topic from the Archives: https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showthread.php?t=395021
Old 05-10-06, 06:16 PM
  #8  
dAracIngPhaRmaCist

 
Apathy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My car burned... And I took it off. Now that I got a new swap (13b-re) I'm gonna get an aftermarket one.
Old 05-10-06, 06:26 PM
  #9  
I'm back Bishes

 
rotorforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Apathy
My car burned... And I took it off. Now that I got a new swap (13b-re) I'm gonna get an aftermarket one.
Your car burned after you took it off? Your FC was destined to light up like a match.
Old 05-10-06, 08:19 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Innovation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winter Park, Florida
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmm, fire or no fire! I would go with no fire! Mazda put it there for a reason. I replaced mine about 2 week's ago with no bad effects. Piece of mind= priceless.

Last edited by Innovation; 05-10-06 at 08:48 PM.
Old 05-12-06, 12:00 PM
  #11  
Progressive Rotorhead

Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
JDriftM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 622
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
RETed, my question now is for you. The parallel set up posted on your site, it does not show a PD, and I understand that it may not be needed, but for peace of mind, I would like to have one. Where in your parallel set up would the aftermarket PD go? Or in your opinion (Only RETed's) is it needed?

J
Old 05-12-06, 12:08 PM
  #12  
ROTARD FOR LIFE!!!

 
MrFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i know someone told me how to reroute the pd to somewhere safer than the top of the engine(mike harrington from nc i think) but that sounds like a good idea. if you can reroute your oil filter in the bay, shouldnt be too hard for the pd
Old 05-12-06, 12:43 PM
  #13  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
Goofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was under the impression that the parallel mod removes the need for the PD entirely.
Old 05-12-06, 12:48 PM
  #14  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Goofy
I was under the impression that the parallel mod removes the need for the PD entirely.
as I recall teds dual set up, uses two FPR. FPR will also work as PDs.
Old 05-12-06, 01:09 PM
  #15  
Sharp Claws

iTrader: (30)
 
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
my take is ditch the thing unless you have a fat wallet.
Old 05-12-06, 05:13 PM
  #16  
Passing life by

 
iceblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Scotland, USA
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Removing the PD IMO and most seasoned tuners is ignorance especially with the valued information on the net from manufacturers. if it was not for a reason don’t you think it would not be on the car?

Teds setup with that brand FPR has a built in PD but not very good one IMO. Has been known to fail.

I run a PD on each rail with a FPR. Only way for me. As you go to larger injectors you get more resence in the rail causing lean spikes. This is caused from the injector solenoid firing rapidly. Think of this as slaping your hand against the watter in the tub.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ls1swap
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
12
10-01-15 07:58 PM
FC_DREAMS
General Rotary Tech Support
20
09-22-15 09:43 PM
Steelwheelz
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
09-15-15 03:22 PM



Quick Reply: Pulsation Damper Necessity or Not?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.