2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Pros and Cons, Single VS. Duel Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-02, 04:44 PM
  #26  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
SoloIIdrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mustang owners don't realize that there cars weigh 3700 pounds....compared to 2600-2800 for an FC.

Again it's not all about horsepower, and paying $1,000 for a turbo or turbo engine is retarded. We are talking about the difference between a single and true duel exhaust. I vote for true duel!
Old 06-24-02, 04:46 PM
  #27  
Full Member

 
rxspd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chatt., TN
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ill back you on that, half of my extended redneck family have mustangs, i have driven most of them, you try to take a corner over 40mph, and your gonna be pushin hard into the other lane, but dont listen to us, just get that 7 runnin, and you will see for urself.
Old 06-24-02, 04:51 PM
  #28  
...

 
dre_2ooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got an N/A and I've taken down:

5.0L stang
a few 4.6L
countless V6 stangs (just like "CiBiCZ," they're everyhwere)
monte carlo with racing prep
V6 camaros (never raced a V8 camaro before)

Jesus christ how did a single vs. dual exhaust come to this? sheesh

AbecX, sorry, but V6 stangs ARE really, really slow. they're underpowered boats. Even a real VTEC Integra will own a V6 stang. Hell, i bet a protege will take down a V6 stang too. :P:

--193 horsepower and 3429 lbs AINT GOING ANYWHERE FAST!






**********PS**********

true dual is the way to go
Old 06-24-02, 04:51 PM
  #29  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
wpgrexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: not in winterpeg anymore
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thank u rxspd, i was waiting for some backup on this topic. Abec, i didn't know your rx didn't work, if i had known i wouldn't have even wasted my time, drive it and love it, do u even know what u are missing. rx7's are amazing cars.
Old 06-24-02, 07:11 PM
  #30  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
AbecX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: /dev/mustang
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SoloIIdrift
Mustang owners don't realize that there cars weigh 3700 pounds....compared to 2600-2800 for an FC.

Again it's not all about horsepower, and paying $1,000 for a turbo or turbo engine is retarded. We are talking about the difference between a single and true duel exhaust. I vote for true duel!
Your a moron. Mustangs weigh in at 3200 lbs, even the 99+'s do.

And its true DUAL. $1000 for a turbo engine is not retarded, but claiming you can beat a car that has over twice the amount of torque and horsepower you do stock is preposterous. Some of you people think street racing is the end all be all. Post up some of your 13 second time slips in your stock n/a cars, then I'll believe you when you say you can beat a stock mustang.
Old 06-24-02, 07:29 PM
  #31  
...

 
dre_2ooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never said my car was stock
Old 06-24-02, 07:35 PM
  #32  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Silkworm
When did the RX-7 get moved to E-Stock? Isn't it in C Stock?

Well, my single 2 1/2" with a magnaflow sounds like a 2 cycle motorcycle engine.. Being a muscle car guy, it sounds like **** compared to my TA, but hey, it's a race car.. Remarkably quiet at idle, but the sound goes up exponentially as throttle is applied Real real loud at WOT

Anyway, G'luck!

PaulC
N/A RX-7's are in E Stock.

http://www.moutons.org/sccasolo/Lists/2002/stockc.html

Last edited by Ziggy682; 06-24-02 at 07:37 PM.
Old 06-24-02, 07:56 PM
  #33  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by AbecX
What the hell is duel exhaust?

Unless your on a turbo, exhaust isnt going to do much for you other then sound. Expect no more 10rwhp if even that. I'm sure it sounds like *** to, I'd get some quiet mufflers and spend the money on something that will actuall give you some power on them straight away's.
Did you bother reading the post before you even started replying? Do you even know what Solo 2 is? I am running in a stock class. The only 2 mods you can do to make your car faster (in a straight line that is) are a filter that drops into the stock air box, and modification of the exhaust after the catalytic converter. Why would I bother spending money on something that will give me some more power on the straight aways when it would make my car illegal to run in my class. By the way, 10 rwhp would be a great gain from an exhaust system, and I would be happy to pay $400 for 10 rwhp while still keeping it legal.
Old 06-24-02, 08:04 PM
  #34  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by AbecX


But when you come flying out of that corner @ 6500 rpms and rev it on up and dont go anywhere, whats the fun in that? I'd get some mods that would help you make the top in power, I mean if you just like to toilet bowl race the corners thats one thing, you might catch up a little around turns, but it wont take 2 seconds for a car with actual horsepower to come right back up and past you. A full exhaust system probably cost in the $500 range easy for these motors, there has to be other stuff out there that would produce and enhance the engine more for that price.
Horsepower is one of the least important things in autocrossing. Yesterday I watched a stock 88 Civic run faster times than 98% of the cars out there. This included several Corvettes, a Dodge Viper, several Camaro Z28's and an SS, and a Porsche Boxter. By the way, there wasn't a single Mustang out there yesterday. I wonder why that is? It's because it doesn't matter how fast your car is. It matters more how well it handles, and how good of a driver you are. I would bet money I could hand you and your 300 hp Mustang your *** on an autocross course in my Stock N/A RX-7. If you live anywhere near Texas, you can take me up on that offer.
Old 06-24-02, 08:28 PM
  #35  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
DCmina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no fighting here! >

I think single would be better, since it'll save you some weight.
Old 06-24-02, 09:59 PM
  #36  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
wpgrexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: not in winterpeg anymore
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by AbecX


Your a moron. Mustangs weigh in at 3200 lbs, even the 99+'s do.

And its true DUAL. $1000 for a turbo engine is not retarded, but claiming you can beat a car that has over twice the amount of torque and horsepower you do stock is preposterous. Some of you people think street racing is the end all be all. Post up some of your 13 second time slips in your stock n/a cars, then I'll believe you when you say you can beat a stock mustang.

naw junior, I think u have it wrong, at the very least you are a moron, no one here said that a stock na runs 13's, if you read other posts completely before reacting you would see that on page 1 someone lists the stock et at high 15's. As well, no one said that we were running on a drag strip, i believe every one said they beat them in a race, A win is a Win no matter what. btw, horsepower to weight ratio is a lot more important in even straight line racing than straight out horsepower, a locomotive probably has a few thousand hp, but i think i could beat it in a race, don't you.
Old 06-26-02, 12:05 PM
  #37  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Ziggy682


Horsepower is one of the least important things in autocrossing. Yesterday I watched a stock 88 Civic run faster times than 98% of the cars out there. This included several Corvettes, a Dodge Viper, several Camaro Z28's and an SS, and a Porsche Boxter. By the way, there wasn't a single Mustang out there yesterday. I wonder why that is? It's because it doesn't matter how fast your car is. It matters more how well it handles, and how good of a driver you are. I would bet money I could hand you and your 300 hp Mustang your *** on an autocross course in my Stock N/A RX-7. If you live anywhere near Texas, you can take me up on that offer.
Hey, AbecX, I read in another post that you live in Mesquite. I live in Denton, so we can make this little challenge happen if you want to.

There are two autocrosses coming up in July. One on the 21st and one on the 28th. Both of them are at Pennington Field in Bedford. Not too far of a drive from you.

You should come out and see some performance machines that were built for more than just going fast in a straight line. It might open your eyes to something other than just drag racing. I gaurantee you will love it.

And the offer still stands. We can go for money or just for fun. Let me know if you can make it.

Anyone else who wants to come out and autocross most definately should. If your in the Dallas area, come and check it out.
Old 06-26-02, 02:24 PM
  #38  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by AbecX


So your telling me your stock mid 16 second car can beat a high 13 low 14 second car? Lemme tell you about all the z06's I beat when I was all stock

Hell, even v6 5spd mustangs run mid 15's now days, all stock to the paper filter, some of them that launch like bob cosby run 14's. N/A Rx7's are slow even from a roll ( unless its turbo'd ).
Hehe, check out this website I found. Scroll down the page until you get to number 75. This is AbecX himself running a "Fast" 1999 V6 Mustang. He ran a 16.323 @ 83.96. With a 2.483 60 ft. time with a RT of 1.045. Man those V6 Mustangs are damn fast, just like you said.

Here's the link, and you can even look at his timeslip.

http://www.v6power.net/timeslips/times.htm
Old 06-26-02, 02:54 PM
  #39  
We come with the Hardcore

iTrader: (2)
 
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AbexC just lost his credibility about "Driver Ability"

Takes a LOT of ability to drag race a V6 w/ an automatic transmission.

If anyone who owns a running, non-vert, non-auto RX-7 can't beat your "fast" time... they should be shot.



Now, BACK TO THE TOPIC!


Which makes more Power? From my understanding, the Single Exhaust makes more low/mid range power. The TRUE Dual makes more top end ( By true dual, I mean road race header, 2 pipes, all the way back. )

Which is louder.... Single.... No questions

Which sounds better? Matter of opinion. They sound pretty close to the same, but the Single's just louder.

Who makes a bigger Y-pipe? Who cares? If you're not running dual all the way back, go single.
Old 06-27-02, 12:36 AM
  #40  
Full Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input Liquid Anarchy. Since this is my daily driver and weekend autocross car, I don't want it to be too loud. But, I think I'll go with a single to save a little weight since I already have the lightest FC ever made. Since I have to run stock exhaust manifold and catalytic converter, I don't think it will be too obnoxiously loud.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD7KiD
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
15
02-26-21 10:12 PM
Skeese
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
65
03-28-17 03:30 PM
FD7KiD
Single Turbo RX-7's
1
08-17-15 11:50 PM



Quick Reply: Pros and Cons, Single VS. Duel Exhaust



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 AM.