possibly justifying a TII hood on a N/A
Originally posted by jaidedeye
1987RX7guy,
we all like to do different things to our cars,, i have a turbo II hood on my n/a...but ya know what?? i like it so >edited< you! i guess i should pull all my s-5 T-II interior out too ....oh..i have a TII oil filler tube!!! oh god im such a poser ricer!!!
and for your info ...it does keep the top of your motor cooler and creates less turbulance for your radiator if you dont use a shroud and an e-fan....
>edited<
1987RX7guy,
we all like to do different things to our cars,, i have a turbo II hood on my n/a...but ya know what?? i like it so >edited< you! i guess i should pull all my s-5 T-II interior out too ....oh..i have a TII oil filler tube!!! oh god im such a poser ricer!!!
and for your info ...it does keep the top of your motor cooler and creates less turbulance for your radiator if you dont use a shroud and an e-fan....
>edited<
And I would also like to see how you build the same intake I do for 70 dollars. I don't use cheap ebay knock-off items either.
Santiago
Last edited by Icemark; Jan 28, 2004 at 04:25 PM.
Thread Starter
Full Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: abilene(shithole)texas
Originally posted by 1987RX7guy
Still rice and still tacky.
There isn't proof one way or another of the area which air flow would be directed in the engine bay since no one will test it. I already spent time to calculate the amount of weight savings it gives you and its minute not small.
Turbo=turbo hood
non-turbo=no turbo hood
non-turbo+turbo hood=poser
Santiago
Still rice and still tacky.
There isn't proof one way or another of the area which air flow would be directed in the engine bay since no one will test it. I already spent time to calculate the amount of weight savings it gives you and its minute not small. Turbo=turbo hood
non-turbo=no turbo hood
non-turbo+turbo hood=poser
Santiago
Originally posted by don7
im not trying to direct the air flow into the engine bay, im saying the air that goes through the TII scoop will go right down the bell housing and tranny and under the car, theoreticly creating less pressure in the bay, thus the air flowing through the radiator into the bay will move better (less turbulence) through the engine bay and out. providing a faster way to get engine bay convection heat out, and making your hot little engine run cooler.
im not trying to direct the air flow into the engine bay, im saying the air that goes through the TII scoop will go right down the bell housing and tranny and under the car, theoreticly creating less pressure in the bay, thus the air flowing through the radiator into the bay will move better (less turbulence) through the engine bay and out. providing a faster way to get engine bay convection heat out, and making your hot little engine run cooler.
your right don7, and at high speeds, the hot air trapped under the hood will actually want to lift the front of the car a bit (theoretically, i can't say for sure how noticable it would be). That is what the hood scoop on the new celica are designed for, vent hot air over the back of the engine and out the bottom to keep the engine bay cooler and add more downforce at higher speeds. btw, it's your car, I say do what you like.
I have a TII hood on my N/A, and its one mod I would get rid of. I felt like such a poseur when people would ask if its a TII. With my swap coming soon I can justify it now, however it was lame when I didn't have a TII. But, do what you want, its your car.
20lbs equates to 0.68xxx% of the total weight of the car
20 lbs is what you save from an N/a steel to TII aluminum hood. Less than one percent of the total weight of the car. Any amount of money spent because you claim mad tYpe R wEiGhT rEdUXxXiOn is wasted money on a ricer mod.
20 lbs is what you save from an N/a steel to TII aluminum hood. Less than one percent of the total weight of the car. Any amount of money spent because you claim mad tYpe R wEiGhT rEdUXxXiOn is wasted money on a ricer mod.
ok...roughly 2 feet of 3 inch intercooler piping (aluminum) had it bent to the right angle....i think its right at 90 degrees with a 30degree kick at the bottom.
4 silicone hose sleeves, and an apex cone filter. i did cut the piping in half so the afm wasnt right over the top of my exhaust... and i also fabricated a bracket to keep everything nice and secure. i know it doesnt cost you jack to build your CAI.....
and BTW i have measured the temps between the turbo hood and the N/A hood...wit the n/a hood my running water temp was 180 degrees, oil temp 170 degrees. with the turbo II hood and a custom vent i added the water temp dropped to 165 to 170 degrees, oil to 160 so however little the temp drop is..its still a decrease... so between the weight reduction and the fact that my engine runs slightly cooler..id say it was worth the 60 bucks i paid for the hood
4 silicone hose sleeves, and an apex cone filter. i did cut the piping in half so the afm wasnt right over the top of my exhaust... and i also fabricated a bracket to keep everything nice and secure. i know it doesnt cost you jack to build your CAI.....
and BTW i have measured the temps between the turbo hood and the N/A hood...wit the n/a hood my running water temp was 180 degrees, oil temp 170 degrees. with the turbo II hood and a custom vent i added the water temp dropped to 165 to 170 degrees, oil to 160 so however little the temp drop is..its still a decrease... so between the weight reduction and the fact that my engine runs slightly cooler..id say it was worth the 60 bucks i paid for the hood
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
It's not rice because it's functional. Now feel free to shut up about it. It vents heat at idle (as you can obviously SEE), and while cruising, it takes air in, benefits may be measurable only by a couple of germs gripping for dear life to the inside of the scoop, but it does function.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



