2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Porting irons results in low compression readings?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 05:11 PM
  #1  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Porting irons results in low compression readings?

I've been thinking about this for a while, and correct me if I'm wrong, porting intake cambers on the 13b causes low compression readings with a standard compression gauge.
To me it makes sense since the profile is changed affecting flow characteristics and depending on the port low end power is sacrificed for the sake of top end power. So when I'm sitting here cranking the motor at 250rpm to check compression the readings don't mean much since the intake ports have been altered. Does anyone have numbers to back this up with, someone who tested their compression before porting their irons and after?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 05:38 PM
  #2  
SpikeDerailed's Avatar
This sh*t burns oil!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 5
From: Charlotte, NC - USA
Unless you extend your ports really far up(into the start of the compression "stoke") it shouldnt have any meaningful effect of compression. Now it will make the engine read less vac. at idle.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 07:11 PM
  #3  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by spikederailed
unless you extend your ports really far up(into the start of the compression "stoke") it shouldnt have any meaningful effect of compression. Now it will make the engine read less vac. At idle.
+1
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 07:53 PM
  #4  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by SpikeDerailed
Unless you extend your ports really far up(into the start of the compression "stoke") it shouldnt have any meaningful effect of compression. Now it will make the engine read less vac. at idle.
What about when combining ports (porting out a 6 into a 4)?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 08:15 PM
  #5  
REAmemiya_fan's Avatar
Passion for Racing
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 2
From: Crown Point, Indiana
I don't know how that is even possible...
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 08:32 PM
  #6  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
you have just ruined the engine.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 08:42 PM
  #7  
JK5S's Avatar
Thread Starter
A Never Ending Project
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City
Originally Posted by SirCygnus
you have just ruined the engine.
How so?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 08:57 PM
  #8  
SirCygnus's Avatar
whats going on?
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,930
Likes: 8
From: atlanta ga
porting that thing like that has proven to be fruitless and will not yeild any more power than the stock port.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2011 | 08:58 PM
  #9  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by JK5S
How so?
By lowering the volumetric efficiency.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 12:04 AM
  #10  
SpikeDerailed's Avatar
This sh*t burns oil!
Tenured Member: 15 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 5
From: Charlotte, NC - USA
Originally Posted by JK5S
What about when combining ports (porting out a 6 into a 4)?
I refer to that as an abomination port. You're free to try it if you want, but learn from others, it will KILL PORT VELOCITY inside the usable rpm range. When looking at the secondary and aux ports as a whole there is already a lot of port area there, cleaning up those ports and extending the primary ports will help. Although the real easy gain is to just get rid of the inconel exhaust diffusers, either spend the ridiculous amount of time to grind the wings off or just replace the sleeves with tii ones.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 04:50 AM
  #11  
andrew j.86.'s Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: pomona, ca
Im sure its crossed few minds. Converting 13b to a t. Removing the sixport housing completely would be a task, I've read not in detail how to remove the exhaust diffusers, replaceable with tII's didn't know that. Any slight advantages on running s5 n/a rotors on a s5tii engine?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 06:35 AM
  #12  
PvillKnight7's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 3
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by andrew j.86.
Im sure its crossed few minds. Converting 13b to a t. Removing the sixport housing completely would be a task, I've read not in detail how to remove the exhaust diffusers, replaceable with tII's didn't know that. Any slight advantages on running s5 n/a rotors on a s5tii engine?
Yes there is.
9.7:1 cpr with a turbo is a fun street car.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 10:46 AM
  #13  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by JK5S
How so?
Because doing so will create a port that won't make much usable power until the 8,000 RPM range, at which point you're out of stock intake and ECU anyway.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cristoDathird
Introduce yourself
28
May 30, 2019 08:47 PM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.