2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Playing with afm.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #1  
rx7vadim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: miami
Playing with afm.

Its easy to play with the spring tension, and adjust back to normal with the dmm and pin 2.

Making a small air bypass and loosening the door spring would help the flow i think?

This could make ur car on the lean side. adjust that with afc or resistor at the water thermo switch.

Just an idea. I should try it and measure the vacium difference.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #2  
rx7vadim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: miami
I loosened the spring, now its noticebly running richer, egts are almost the same.

Now its 8ucking fast. and screams like a ****.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #3  
mario1386's Avatar
mazda mario
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: port st lucie
show pics of what you are doing, might help
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #4  
rx7vadim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: miami
i dont think pics will help you
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2008 | 10:56 PM
  #5  
pengarufoo's Avatar
The mystery of the prize.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 832
Likes: 2
From: Bay area
open the s4 afm and turn the toothed ring to adjust the spring tension... this changes the afr.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:15 AM
  #6  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Screwing with the spring can only change the entire curve, not just one part of it. If you richen it up, the car will be richer across the entire board.

Only very crude tuning can be accomplished via the AFM and tuning it to make the car run nicely at one point will cause all other points to run poorly.

An S-AFC does the same thing but allows you to apply different correction points based on load an RPM. They are cheap on eBay.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 09:34 AM
  #7  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Seems you should mark one of the teeth on the *gear* and then make a mark just opposite that gear mark. So you can return everything back to it's original position.

I've messed with it before and frankly, just moving one tooth one way or the other makes a marked difference in the way the car runs. But it also requires an adjustment to the air bypass when the teeth are moved so the idle speed can be stabalized. Some of the difference in the running of the engine isn't favorable imho. Nothing wrong with messing around with it as long as you can go back to where you started.

IF you can't go back to the original setting, then it's good to have enough dough to buy another one or have a spare handy.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #8  
rx7vadim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: miami
It made alot of diff on top end.
before i couldnt even feel vdi effect.

I was looking at some dyno graphs and runing richer on top end made more hp vs lean on top end.

WOT is at 1450f with factory timing. before it was 1400f timing advanced 5 deg.
Idle is at 750deg. before 850deg.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #9  
pengarufoo's Avatar
The mystery of the prize.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 832
Likes: 2
From: Bay area
My old Protege had the same type of AFM and I used this technique to fatten up the mixture a slight bit, made a world of difference. More power everywhere, that car was too lean for some reason - bone stock. You could get a similar effect by adjusting the fuel pressure with an aftermarket adjustable regulator, this is just a free means to the same end.

I just turned it a couple teeth at a time between test drives and eventually settled on a new position that seemed to work best, which obviously required reaching the points where the performance and drivability got worse. You eventually locate a sweet spot... once found seal the cover back up with some silicone and enjoy.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 01:28 PM
  #10  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by rx7vadim
It made alot of diff on top end.
before i couldnt even feel vdi effect.
I was looking at some dyno graphs and runing richer on top end made more hp vs lean on top end.
Who's dyno graphs? Yours after some AFM adjustments? Have you dyno'd the car before and after?

WOT is at 1450f with factory timing. before it was 1400f timing advanced 5 deg.
Idle is at 750deg. before 850deg.
~50 degrees is not enough to make any kind of comparison. Running higher EGTs at idle would indicate idle is richer.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 02:54 PM
  #11  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Timing is also effected by the afm. See HENRIK at this thread: https://www.rx7club.com/showthread.p...ght=TIMING+AFM
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #12  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
this mod would've been sweet in like 1997
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #13  
rx7vadim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: miami
i calculated that afm is very restrictive.

bore of afm is 1.5 x 2.25" equal to 3.375 sq in surface area.

TB 1.75" batterflys equal to 7.216

my 650 holley 1.5" equal to 7.069 i guess take away for shaft taking space.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #14  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Yeah, the AFM is totally restrictive. I mean, people only make 450 RWHP with them in place. Ridiculously restrictive.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #15  
mario1386's Avatar
mazda mario
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: port st lucie
my question is when you move the gear which way is lean and rich? show me
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #16  
rx7vadim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: miami
Originally Posted by Aaron Cake
Yeah, the AFM is totally restrictive. I mean, people only make 450 RWHP with them in place. Ridiculously restrictive.
Does ne1 make 200whp n/a with it in place. i didnt think so.

It flows less then 500 cfm, turbo sucking throw it is not the same as n/a .


Why even go stand alone on n/a when you can make fuel curve with afc.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #17  
need RX7's Avatar
Listen to King Diamond.
Tenured Member: 15 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 13
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Eh, I wouldn't want to mess with something like this without concrete data showing me exactly what I was changing.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #18  
rx7vadim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: miami
Originally Posted by need RX7
Eh, I wouldn't want to mess with something like this without concrete data showing me exactly what I was changing.
i agree, at least i have egt , its shows some changes.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #19  
pengarufoo's Avatar
The mystery of the prize.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 832
Likes: 2
From: Bay area
it's so easy to reverse who cares if you have time and you're curious just go move it around a few teeth back and forth and see what happens. Just mark the ring before you move it if you're really scared... if there's anything good about driving a old 80's high mileage sports car it's the low risk involved in tinkering, if you're not even tinkering why have this car it drinks too much gas isn't terribly fast and tends to need engine rebuilds too often, please tell me it's not your DD and you're afraid of screwing it up. If it is, you've already screwed up selecting the wrong car to sit in traffic with.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:00 AM
  #20  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by rx7vadim
Does ne1 make 200whp n/a with it in place. i didnt think so.
That's not a limitation of the AFM though, that's a limitation of how much air the engine can flow at atmospheric pressure.

I think you'd be interested to know that back in the day, it was common to run PP engines with a large plenum using the AFM to run the EFI system. This is because the early speed density systems could not compensate for the wild vacuum fluctuations very well. The plenum and AFM did a much better job of measuring airflow since the AFM measures it directly.

It flows less then 500 cfm, turbo sucking throw it is not the same as n/a .
Explain the difference.

Why even go stand alone on n/a when you can make fuel curve with afc.
Because a standalone gives you full control that an S-AFC with the stock ECU never will. For example, you can drive the injectors far harder, pull them down far lower, make your own timing curve, apply your own temperature corrections, etc. etc.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #21  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
Originally Posted by mario1386
my question is when you move the gear which way is lean and rich? show me
Clockwise makes the spring stiffer and it takes more force to move the vane aft. Mark a gear tooth relative to the body of the afm if your going to mess around. If you don't, and the gear unwinds................you've become a lost puppy dog.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #22  
mario1386's Avatar
mazda mario
Tenured Member: 15 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: port st lucie
Originally Posted by HAILERS
Clockwise makes the spring stiffer and it takes more force to move the vane aft. Mark a gear tooth relative to the body of the afm if your going to mess around. If you don't, and the gear unwinds................you've become a lost puppy dog.

(Clockwise makes the spring stiffer and it takes more force to move the vane aft) so this would make it rich or lean?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 11:42 AM
  #23  
HAILERS's Avatar
HAILERS
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 20,563
Likes: 27
From: FORT WORTH, TEXAS,USA
leaner
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #24  
rx7vadim's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
From: miami
Originally Posted by HAILERS
leaner

Hailers, it was tested on this forum 380cfm vs s5 420 cfm. 380cfm isnt enought to for 180 engine hp. Restrictive pos. ?


12a mikki carb probably flows 380 cfm.

Kahren did 170sh whp, but didnt state if it was with afm, but using a apexi afc probably means that he did.

But without afm made 25whp extra hp.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #25  
Kahren's Avatar
i am not a girl
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,916
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by rx7vadim
Hailers, it was tested on this forum 380cfm vs s5 420 cfm. 380cfm isnt enought to for 180 engine hp. Restrictive pos. ?


12a mikki carb probably flows 380 cfm.

Kahren did 170sh whp, but didnt state if it was with afm, but using a apexi afc probably means that he did.

But without afm made 25whp extra hp.

i made 195 with the afm and it would have been more if the injectors didnt run out
here is the link
https://www.rx7club.com/time-slips-dyno-128/na-6port-streetport-dynoed-195whp-update-418805/
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 AM.