ok sorta new question about driving habits
#1
I'm your huckleberry..
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok sorta new question about driving habits
Ok, i have an s4 N/a.
Now i was reading about port overlap and how or little roto-bangers have to run rich at low RPM's so it can actaully run smoothly, because of vacuum suckin in exhaust charge and all..
so my question..
is it better, i.e. MPG better, to drive at higher rpm's at a given speed or lower?
I ask because im used to pretty much lugging the engine at ~ 1500 RPM at 40 when im crusing. But hearing aobut how our engies have to run richer at low RPM's would it actually use LESS gasoline to keep it in fourth at ~2000 RPM's at that speed?
In the same line of thinking, when i'm on the freeway, what's the best, or "most efficient" speed? I'm used to cruising around 80, just becasue the car seems to love that speed. 65 is too slow, and 90 is pushing it for long distances.
I dunno, anyone have thoughts, or facts? or am i just dumb
Now i was reading about port overlap and how or little roto-bangers have to run rich at low RPM's so it can actaully run smoothly, because of vacuum suckin in exhaust charge and all..
so my question..
is it better, i.e. MPG better, to drive at higher rpm's at a given speed or lower?
I ask because im used to pretty much lugging the engine at ~ 1500 RPM at 40 when im crusing. But hearing aobut how our engies have to run richer at low RPM's would it actually use LESS gasoline to keep it in fourth at ~2000 RPM's at that speed?
In the same line of thinking, when i'm on the freeway, what's the best, or "most efficient" speed? I'm used to cruising around 80, just becasue the car seems to love that speed. 65 is too slow, and 90 is pushing it for long distances.
I dunno, anyone have thoughts, or facts? or am i just dumb
#6
Not sure what the most efficient range is but think there is some truth to this. I remember reading that the reason why Mazda's early 70's cars got bad gas mileage was that the EPA test speeds was too slow.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I'm hard on mine, I get HORRID gas mileage (never checked actual gas consumption, but can go through a tank in less than a day)
If i'm easy on it, it lasts for at least 2 days , maybe 3 if not driving a lot
If i'm easy on it, it lasts for at least 2 days , maybe 3 if not driving a lot
Trending Topics
#8
Eat Rice Don't Drive it.
iTrader: (3)
Originally posted by eljefe62
When I'm hard on mine, I get HORRID gas mileage (never checked actual gas consumption, but can go through a tank in less than a day)
If i'm easy on it, it lasts for at least 2 days , maybe 3 if not driving a lot
When I'm hard on mine, I get HORRID gas mileage (never checked actual gas consumption, but can go through a tank in less than a day)
If i'm easy on it, it lasts for at least 2 days , maybe 3 if not driving a lot
how the hell are you waisting your entire tank in two days???? how far do you drive per day? I get about 300 miles to a tank driving a 50 50 mix of city and highway and 70 30 hard driving and normal. I drive about 50 miles a day and it lasts me about 4 days and I have an S4 with a smaller tank than your S5
Santiago
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The wonders of Rotary
i drive probably 50-100 per day, mostly city driving, and i think that my tps is off (or something, failed emissions recently)
but haven't had a chance to sit down and fix it
maybe after that will get better? anyways...
i drive probably 50-100 per day, mostly city driving, and i think that my tps is off (or something, failed emissions recently)
but haven't had a chance to sit down and fix it
maybe after that will get better? anyways...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turbo-minivan
General Rotary Tech Support
69
02-04-16 12:29 AM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
08-26-15 09:52 PM