2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

O2 readings for N/A second Gen, cost Vs. benifit of S-AFC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-03, 01:10 AM
  #1  
Locust of the apocalypse

Thread Starter
 
YearsOfDecay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Directly above the center of the earth (York, PA)
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
O2 readings for N/A second Gen, cost Vs. benifit of S-AFC

I recently hooked a WideBand up tp my 89 GTU with the following mods, No Cats, Bonez mid pipe, Racing Beat cat back, working 6-ports (set at 5.2K), K&N filter and Cold air box)

I was feeling a loss of power at about 7K (more than expected), after adding the racing beat exhaust and was thinking it was running lean... WELL, the wideband told us different.... Here are the numbers.. RPM then Wideband Reading...

5000 13.5

5500 13.1

6000 12.8

6500 12.3

7000 12.1

7500 11.8

These are average over several FWO pulls from 4K to 75000 in 2nd and 3rd

As you can see, she's getting richer as she gets higher in RPM... These numbers are closer to what my buddy's single turbo third gen runs at 20lbs of boost than i would expect for a N/A 2nd gen.... Doctor Dave at KD Rotary suggested low 13's all the way for an N/A.

SOOOOOOOO.......

Right now... I'm running from 15.1 to 15.4 Seconds consistently at the track....

Will adding an S-AFC and taking some fuel out in this range increase my horsepower on the top end enough to get me into the 14's, or aint it worth the 300 buckeroo's????

AND... is there anything else I should be looking for.. I know this car can go 14's without running a bottle.. but, if its going to take 10 grand to do it.. screw it.. i'll buy a TII!!!
Old 05-05-03, 01:24 AM
  #2  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: wow
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
with the mods you have, you should have already had an S-afc. The stock fuel system sucks ***. Get an S-afc, tune your car, then run it till it blows.
Old 05-05-03, 02:34 AM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
rotary>piston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
no, the stock fuel system can handle a lot. I've heard up to 190rwhp can be achieved with it. He's running RICH remember? That means he has too much fuel, which means that the fuel system is overly adequate.
Old 05-05-03, 03:15 AM
  #4  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Ther are definite gains to be had be leaning out those mixtures a bit. It won't be heaps, but it will be noticable. Tuning like this should only be done on the dyno though.
Old 05-05-03, 07:23 AM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
silverrotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto, Corporate Canada
Posts: 7,592
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Decay, what fuel ratio are you targeting?
Old 05-05-03, 10:58 AM
  #6  
Eat, sleep, work, mod.

 
jon88se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Long Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
w/o a dyno an EGT gauge would help too...the NA fuel system is more than adequate for any NA setup that is still fuel injected. The ECU is what is making the mixture richer and richer as you wind the motor out. expect about 10 or less hp to the wheels from about 6K on when you take some fuel out. do it on the dyno though, really the best way to do these things. an NA should hit the 860 celcius mark as a ceiling for EGT numbers under 4th gear WOT (w/ the probe right after the manifold).
Old 05-05-03, 10:29 PM
  #7  
Locust of the apocalypse

Thread Starter
 
YearsOfDecay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Directly above the center of the earth (York, PA)
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well, the Doctor told me to shoot for about 13.5 A/F... i thought 11.8 was way rich....
Old 05-05-03, 10:51 PM
  #8  
I came, I saw, I boosted.

 
Bambam7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's about right.... Racing beat techs have told me that while every engine is a little different (mods, etc)

The best power will com from around 13:1 in the low-mid to almost 14:1 at redline.

I LOVED my S-AFC. I don't think I got more than 10 peak hp at redline (well, maybe 15...) but the midrange increase was fantastic. Typically N/A's run rich in the midrange, and can be leaned out a LOT.... it brought back at least as much low-midrange as I had before I took out my 6port sleeves. Pretty cool!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hotshot2014
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
07-18-17 02:30 PM
stickmantijuana
MoTeC
5
09-10-15 07:58 PM
immanuel__7
Canadian Forum
5
09-02-15 08:26 AM
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
08-31-15 07:49 PM
Wolf_
Single Turbo RX-7's
3
08-11-15 04:23 PM



Quick Reply: O2 readings for N/A second Gen, cost Vs. benifit of S-AFC



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.