2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

non turbo realistic numbers? or go turbo?

Old Jan 9, 2007 | 01:35 AM
  #1  
mattyL's Avatar
Thread Starter
88 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: delta
non turbo realistic numbers? or go turbo?

Hey i am planning on re-doing my engine in a couple months or so. i want to stay non turbo because i dont want to switch the rear end and all that. i am looking to get around 230hp or so (non turbo) is that realistic? im gonna be getting the engine rebuilt so while its apart id just get them 2 street port/bridge port or what ever needs to be done to get around 230hp range... so my questions are, are thoes numbers realistic from a non-turbo? if not what would be the top hp i could get without going too crazy on it, its a daily driver, i just wanna keep up to 5.0's or even my friends 89 ford probe gt (stock turbo on it)......or would changing the rear end and all that(turbo swap) be cheaper then just gettin the engine thats in it now rebuilt and ported?
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 02:21 AM
  #2  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 23
From: n
Almost impossible with the stock intake / ECU...


-Ted
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 02:31 AM
  #3  
mattyL's Avatar
Thread Starter
88 7
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: delta
im willing to change ne thing under the hood i just dont wanna pull the tranny, rear end and all of that. if its imposable for 230hp then what would be some more realistic numbers then? or is it just imposable 2 keep up to a stock 89 turbo ford probe in a non turbo 13b?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 06:26 AM
  #4  
Attila the Fun's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Apex, NC, USA
When my car still had it's 2-rotor motor, I was able to get in the 210 - 215 hp range. That included having the motor street ported. The advantage, IMHO, was not having to deal with all the crap that goes along with a turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 07:35 AM
  #5  
toplessFC3Sman's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,169
Likes: 5
From: Ann Arbor, MI
I know its been done, but you're probably looking at a bridgeport, custom intake, and definately a stand-alone
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #6  
SASSER's Avatar
Calm like a bomb
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, GA
1/2 Bridgeport with renesis rotors(for higher compression) and ceramic seals would be your best bet.

You will need a Standalone to run it though, and prolly a T2 transmission if you go over a streetport. N/A trannies from what I hear and have exp'd are very brittle. After 2 rebuilds later I just got a TurboII Tranny. You would be able to keep your rearend, and halfshafts, etc, if you use the turbo tranny to n/a rearend driveshaft mazdatrix sells and counterweight and flywheel.

Last edited by SASSER; Jan 10, 2007 at 08:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #7  
Aaron Cake's Avatar
Engine, Not Motor
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 29,798
Likes: 128
From: London, Ontario, Canada
You can't just use Renesis rotors as the apex seal grooves are to shallow for the previous seals, and the Renesis seals are not tall enough for peripheral exhausts.

Advice like this is disturbing.

If you want 230 RWHP on a non-turbo, then you'll be looking at a half-bridge at the very least. Keep in mind that NA bridgeports aren't exactly torque monsters down low but are not nearly as bad as most people say. Keeping this in mind, you will need a standalone and a proper tune to run it all. You'll want either a custom intake (the bridgeporting really screws with the stock intake tuning) or go to something like IDAs on an aftermarket manifold (TweakIT).

The transmission will be fine.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 08:50 AM
  #8  
fc3sna's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Vero Beach, Florida
well you didnt mention if you want 230 at the wheels or fly wheel, because the local shop here said with a good street port, 48 webbers, and a good exhaust on an s5 engine will give you around 200-205 hp to the rear wheels. but thats what they said i dont know **** about building motors so dont hold this to me.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 08:50 AM
  #9  
turboefini88's Avatar
Long rifle.
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh
Originally Posted by SASSER
1/2 Bridgeport with renesis rotors(for higher compression) and ceramic seals would be your best bet.

You will need a Standalone to run it though, and prolly a T2 transmission if you go over a streetport. N/A trannies from what I hear and have exp'd are very brittle. After 2 rebuilds later I just got a TurboII Tranny. You would be able to keep your rearend, and halfshafts, etc, if you use the turbo tranny to n/a rearend driveshaft mazdatrix sells and counterweight and flywheel.

I was under the impression that the TII tranny would not accept the NA driveshaft due to larger Ujoints, thus needing to change out the driveshaft. This would lead to needing to change the rear end to accept the TII driveshaft, thus leading to having to change the Half shafts from the rear end to the wheel hubs. Correct me if I am wrong, but from everything I have seen and read, its impossible to do that swap without changing the whole drivetrain.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #10  
fc3sna's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: Vero Beach, Florida
mazdatrix makes a turbo tranny to na rear end drive shaft with replaceable u joints.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 09:11 AM
  #11  
turboefini88's Avatar
Long rifle.
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh
Ohh yeah forgot bout that one
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
9
Feb 24, 2019 12:09 PM
hotshot2014
New Member RX-7 Technical
8
Jul 18, 2017 02:30 PM
immanuel__7
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
89
Sep 5, 2015 10:23 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.