non-turbo ported and running lean on top.....
Thread Starter
Collections Hold
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 3
From: Pataskala, Ohio
non-turbo ported and running lean on top.....
I have just finished up breaking my new motor I rebuilt. It is a 89-91 non-turbo, and I ported the primarys and secondarys, removed the sleeves, devcon epoxy to smooth transition of the 5th and 6th ports. I am using TII rotor housings, that I street ported as well. The intake was ported in some area's around injectors and ect to free up some restriction. After break in it seems to lean out at high rpm, and it cuts out entirely at 7.5k rpm. It is all stock otherwise except for a kN filter. Exhaust is coming tommorrow, but I dont think this will make a difference in fuel starvation. the Injectors were cleaned and balanced, but are stock , the fuel pump is stock too. I read all of Icemarks setup and he seemed to richen up on top end, but I know for sure that mine is starving. Other people say they leaned out after the porting. IS my fuel pump bad? Or are the stock 460cc too small? Fuel filter is new too, that is not it either. If anyone has experience, let me know! Thanks!
Re: non-turbo ported and running lean on top.....
Originally posted by GtoRx7
...I know for sure that mine is starving.
...I know for sure that mine is starving.
You don't need a wide-band to do this.
Get a DMM and probe the O2 signal wire and a good ground, and tell us what kinda voltage readings you are seeing. The signal should be between 0 and 1VDC.
-Ted
Get a DMM and probe the O2 signal wire and a good ground, and tell us what kinda voltage readings you are seeing. The signal should be between 0 and 1VDC.
-Ted
Trending Topics
Locust of the apocalypse
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 2
From: Directly above the center of the earth (York, PA)
I thought my 89-91 was leaning out as well.... got it on a dyno with a wideband... NOPE.. it was hitting 10's on the A/f at 7K rpm....... this was after a racingbeat exhaust and a K&N filter with a cold air box.!!!
Like everyone has mentioned, the stock fuel system is more than enough for ~180 FWHP. However, this is under ideal conditions with the entire fuel system running at tip top shape. As we all know these cars are 15-18 years old, so it's hard to expect your fuel system to still be at 100% after all those years.
My 86 is similar to your setup: S5 street port, headers, intake, no cat, S-AFC, etc... On the wideband I was running out of fuel around 7000 RPM. (Hitting 15's on the wideband!) The S-AFC was at +25 and it wasn't making any difference. I switched to 550 injectors in the secondaries and I added an S5 TII fuel pump.
After those changes, I was able to maintain A/Fs in the 12's.
Question:
What ECU are you running? S4 or S5? If you have an S4, then you are hitting the Rev-Limiter at 7500.
My 86 is similar to your setup: S5 street port, headers, intake, no cat, S-AFC, etc... On the wideband I was running out of fuel around 7000 RPM. (Hitting 15's on the wideband!) The S-AFC was at +25 and it wasn't making any difference. I switched to 550 injectors in the secondaries and I added an S5 TII fuel pump.
After those changes, I was able to maintain A/Fs in the 12's.
Question:
What ECU are you running? S4 or S5? If you have an S4, then you are hitting the Rev-Limiter at 7500.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smikels
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
3
Aug 18, 2015 01:26 PM



