N/A to Turbo Idea
#1
N/A to Turbo Idea
So here's my crazy idea or at last the. want to turn my n/a 6 port S4 13B into a 13BT 6 port instead of going for a 4 port TII. My theory is to set everything up using my stock n/a block with an Rtek ECU, with the S4 TII UIM and LIM, S4 Turbo and TMIC and downpipe. I need to find a way to match the 6 port to the TII manifold. Though I may have to go Custom with this. To prevent overboosting i plan to setup the turbo to spool at 4,000rpm since the Auxiliary ports open at 3,800rpm. though I suppose that if I removed the actuators the auxiliary ports would always be open and also prevent the overboost.
If anyone can help me to come to a final conclusion with this I would greatly appreciate it.
If anyone can help me to come to a final conclusion with this I would greatly appreciate it.
#5
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
It would be an act of engineering and machining pain-in-the-***'ness to make the aux port system work with the TII lower intake. You'd have to add all the hardware and actuators to run the sleeves, as well as rework the secondary runners. And gain nothing, because the turbo will then not fit.
If you want a working aux port 6 port turbo engine, stick with the NA lower intake manifold. Build/modify a tubular turbo manifold to move the the turbo up and out away from the lower. Exact procedure depends on the turbo you intend to run. Then if space allows, just use the aux port actuators and run them via boost, controlled with a solenoid on you standalone (no RTek). If space doesn't allow, get creative with a bit of bicycle brake cable and remote mount the actuator.
Forget all this "spool turbo at 4000 RPM" stuff, it means nothing. Turbochargers spool according to engine load. The EMS is tuned to supply the proper A/F ratios and timing at all points in the map.
From the FAQ:
Can I swap a Turbo engine/Jspec engine/13BT/etc into my Non Turbo?
Yes, check these links:
https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-gen-archive-72/s4-na-turbo-swap-details-813825/
http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/ro...conversion.htm
http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/2n...o_s4_swap.html
http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/2n...o_s5_swap.html
How do I add a turbo to my NA 13B?
What Turbo kits can I add onto my non turbo RX-7?
There are no longer kits formally made at the time of this post, however there are companies from time to time that do make available non turbo to Turbo Kits. Because most of these companies stop building the kits, or go out of business in short time, it is impossible to keep active links for them.
Most people that turbo a non turbo make their own kits:
Using the stock TII turbo, exhaust manifold with spacer, NA intakes and NA ECU:
http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/naturbo.htm
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=88540
Aaron Cake's "Project Tina":
http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/projecttina/
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=88758
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=124232
http://users2.ev1.net/~ccoutts/turbo..._a_project.htm
Using the stock TII turbo, exhaust manifold, intakes, ECU:
http://forum.teamfc3s.org/showthread.php?t=37694
How to port match the TII lower intake to fit the 6 port block, allowing you to bolt on all stock TII turbo stuff to an NA engine:
http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/4PortLIMTo6Port.htm
Turbo-NA Forum:
http://www.aaroncake.net/forum/forum...urbocharged+NA
If you want a working aux port 6 port turbo engine, stick with the NA lower intake manifold. Build/modify a tubular turbo manifold to move the the turbo up and out away from the lower. Exact procedure depends on the turbo you intend to run. Then if space allows, just use the aux port actuators and run them via boost, controlled with a solenoid on you standalone (no RTek). If space doesn't allow, get creative with a bit of bicycle brake cable and remote mount the actuator.
Forget all this "spool turbo at 4000 RPM" stuff, it means nothing. Turbochargers spool according to engine load. The EMS is tuned to supply the proper A/F ratios and timing at all points in the map.
From the FAQ:
Can I swap a Turbo engine/Jspec engine/13BT/etc into my Non Turbo?
Yes, check these links:
https://www.rx7club.com/2nd-gen-archive-72/s4-na-turbo-swap-details-813825/
http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/ro...conversion.htm
http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/2n...o_s4_swap.html
http://www.rotaryresurrection.com/2n...o_s5_swap.html
How do I add a turbo to my NA 13B?
What Turbo kits can I add onto my non turbo RX-7?
There are no longer kits formally made at the time of this post, however there are companies from time to time that do make available non turbo to Turbo Kits. Because most of these companies stop building the kits, or go out of business in short time, it is impossible to keep active links for them.
Most people that turbo a non turbo make their own kits:
Using the stock TII turbo, exhaust manifold with spacer, NA intakes and NA ECU:
http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/naturbo.htm
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=88540
Aaron Cake's "Project Tina":
http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/projecttina/
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...threadid=88758
https://www.rx7club.com/forum/showth...hreadid=124232
http://users2.ev1.net/~ccoutts/turbo..._a_project.htm
Using the stock TII turbo, exhaust manifold, intakes, ECU:
http://forum.teamfc3s.org/showthread.php?t=37694
How to port match the TII lower intake to fit the 6 port block, allowing you to bolt on all stock TII turbo stuff to an NA engine:
http://www.aaroncake.net/rx-7/4PortLIMTo6Port.htm
Turbo-NA Forum:
http://www.aaroncake.net/forum/forum...urbocharged+NA
Trending Topics
#9
Turbo power, activate!
iTrader: (7)
relocating the turbo to the driver side is a waste of time and money. Thats a **** ton of fabricating and depending on how big the turbo manifold runners are, going to lag like crazy.
You can move the turbo foward more by fabricating your own turbo manifolds. Moving the placement of the turbo forward enough to not hit the LIM
You can move the turbo foward more by fabricating your own turbo manifolds. Moving the placement of the turbo forward enough to not hit the LIM
#10
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,849
Received 2,613 Likes
on
1,852 Posts
find a cartech manifold, it fits a real T4 turbo WITH the NA intake AND 6 port actuators. pipe in an IC, turbo injectors, fuel pump, ecu of your choice and you're done.
than manifold puts the turbo low and to the rear, basically it'll fit with all the emissions equipment too.
than manifold puts the turbo low and to the rear, basically it'll fit with all the emissions equipment too.
#12
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
Google doesn't know much about that turbo other than it seems to be similar to the T04E 50 trim and is aimed at the EVO market. Meaning that the turbine side is almost guaranteed to be way too small.
find a cartech manifold, it fits a real T4 turbo WITH the NA intake AND 6 port actuators. pipe in an IC, turbo injectors, fuel pump, ecu of your choice and you're done.
than manifold puts the turbo low and to the rear, basically it'll fit with all the emissions equipment too.
than manifold puts the turbo low and to the rear, basically it'll fit with all the emissions equipment too.
Why oh why would anyone EVER remove the BAC valve and remove the cold start thermowax?! There are no gains, zero. Only losses in drivability. There is absolutely no valid reason to every remove them. PERIOD.
#13
Sharp Claws
iTrader: (30)
I agree that once under boost, you don't need the working aux ports. However since we do most of our driving out of boost, having the aux ports open all the time just makes the car lifeless in regular driving, exactly the same as wiring them open in an NA application. Which is why I'd suggest that instead of having them wide open when turbocharging the engine, that they be kept closed. Or that the sleeve be welded up to cover up approximately half the aux port, then epoxied into place in the housing. Assuming a smallish turbo and modest power goals, of course. Big turbos and port jobs are a different story...
#16
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Posts: 30,849
Received 2,613 Likes
on
1,852 Posts
#17
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
Now I guess one has to compare the large amount of space issues created by having working ports to the easiness of just bolting on a modded TII lower intake. It's a packaging nightmare. Even more so in my Cosmo because the frame rails are 5" closer together than the FC!
With a standalone, absolutely. On the stock ECU, the BAC is far less useful on cold starts. I also remove the thermowax when going to a standalone with BAC control.
#18
I'm pretty sure that I have the following issues:
BAC doesn't work
Thermowax doesn't work
My TPS needs to be replaced, I idle at 1500-2000rpm at startup and once warm, I've tested this theory by pushing the plastic stopper in and my idle is normal.
All of my vacuum lines need to be replaced
So I figure removing the BAC and Thermowax won't affect anything considering the fact I live in Tucson, Arizona and our record low on the temp scale is 22 degrees Fahrenheit.
As for blocking off the Pulsation dampener, I'm talking about the little plastic piece on the end of the fuel rail, mine is cracked and I know they have a tendency to fail. My friend replaced his with a bolt because it was leaking and now he has no issues and it runs better than before.
BAC doesn't work
Thermowax doesn't work
My TPS needs to be replaced, I idle at 1500-2000rpm at startup and once warm, I've tested this theory by pushing the plastic stopper in and my idle is normal.
All of my vacuum lines need to be replaced
So I figure removing the BAC and Thermowax won't affect anything considering the fact I live in Tucson, Arizona and our record low on the temp scale is 22 degrees Fahrenheit.
As for blocking off the Pulsation dampener, I'm talking about the little plastic piece on the end of the fuel rail, mine is cracked and I know they have a tendency to fail. My friend replaced his with a bolt because it was leaking and now he has no issues and it runs better than before.
#19
Sharp Claws
iTrader: (30)
Even with stock turbos, I find that running without functional aux ports makes the car drive like Geo Metro. Takes fare more throttle and clutch slippage to get the car going, mileage suffers, vacuum signal is weaker and in general, anything expected of massive port duration pretty much happens. Now others may be far less sensitive to this, and I think part of my sensitivity comes from the fact that I drive a Honda Insight and the electric motor provides immediate torque from 0 RPM on up. But it does illustrate the point that there is a big hole in the torque band without functional ports. When the pedal is on the floor it's a non-issue. That's not what I'm referring to though. What you gain below 3500RPM with the actuators working is a far more responsive engine that doesn't need large amounts of throttle to drive comfortably. It's like the difference between parallel and sequential turbos on the FD.
Now I guess one has to compare the large amount of space issues created by having working ports to the easiness of just bolting on a modded TII lower intake. It's a packaging nightmare. Even more so in my Cosmo because the frame rails are 5" closer together than the FC!
With a standalone, absolutely. On the stock ECU, the BAC is far less useful on cold starts. I also remove the thermowax when going to a standalone with BAC control.
Now I guess one has to compare the large amount of space issues created by having working ports to the easiness of just bolting on a modded TII lower intake. It's a packaging nightmare. Even more so in my Cosmo because the frame rails are 5" closer together than the FC!
With a standalone, absolutely. On the stock ECU, the BAC is far less useful on cold starts. I also remove the thermowax when going to a standalone with BAC control.
so in retrospect these setups that i have put together that performed better than a 100% bone stock FD in perfect working order, i hardly found argument worthy of trying to gain even more response below 3k RPMs where you realistically plan on doing what? pulling trees out of the ground like a V8 truck? even on the freeway i never drove any 7 below 3k because even n/a's with fully functioning 5/6th ports feel luggy down there.
maybe it will work, but i also believe the twin charger setup i'm working on would do it one up(if i ever find the time to actually finish it). i just don't believe there is as much to gain down there as is aimed at. the stock turbos did virtually the same with the twin scroll which none of the setups i mentioned had a functioning twin scroll turbo. so in essence that would be a MUCH easier alternative to get the velocity up and turbo spooled sooner making power earlier, or use 4 port irons.
Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 01-04-12 at 01:41 PM.
#20
Engine, Not Motor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes
on
91 Posts
perhaps i'm more tuned to the other way around. all the hybrid setups i have built feel very responsive and much easier to take off from a dead stop with when compared to my series 4 TII 8.5:1 engine with 75k miles on it with the T70 non BB turbo strapped to the side which comes on at a whopping 5k RPMs like a light switch, not an ounce before. with the 9lb flywheel taking off from stops is a chore.
so in retrospect these setups that i have put together that performed better than a 100% bone stock FD in perfect working order, i hardly found argument worthy of trying to gain even more response below 3k RPMs where you realistically plan on doing what? pulling trees out of the ground like a V8 truck? even on the freeway i never drove any 7 below 3k because even n/a's with fully functioning 5/6th ports feel luggy down there.
maybe it will work, but i also believe the twin charger setup i'm working on would do it one up(if i ever find the time to actually finish it). i just don't believe there is as much to gain down there as is aimed at. the stock turbos did virtually the same with the twin scroll which none of the setups i mentioned had a functioning twin scroll turbo. so in essence that would be a MUCH easier alternative to get the velocity up and turbo spooled sooner making power earlier, or use 4 port irons.
#21
Sharp Claws
iTrader: (30)
i try to avoid bogging the car much, the old tired trannies chatter when you lug them around as they seem to prefer the mid to upper range.
was hoping to have more time this winter to work on getting the mounting bracket and flanges done for the SC, fortunately yet unfortunately i'm still too busy to get to it so the built SC is sitting on the wall in the office still collecting dust. i really want to get it done but at the same time i rarely drive the TII anymore, maybe once or twice a month or for long road trips. setback was partially the thick plate i am making the flanges from, my torch can't cut it... so i have been looking into a TIG/plasma setup but haven't found anything worthwhile locally yet.
another issue i ran into is the snout is just too long so i have been on the lookout for a short nose snout for the eaton but haven't had much luck there either. i don't really want to run a 4" spacer to the SC pulley off the crank. cheap eatons haven't been available lately, suppose they're getting harder to come by, at least the short snout versions aren't.
was hoping to have more time this winter to work on getting the mounting bracket and flanges done for the SC, fortunately yet unfortunately i'm still too busy to get to it so the built SC is sitting on the wall in the office still collecting dust. i really want to get it done but at the same time i rarely drive the TII anymore, maybe once or twice a month or for long road trips. setback was partially the thick plate i am making the flanges from, my torch can't cut it... so i have been looking into a TIG/plasma setup but haven't found anything worthwhile locally yet.
another issue i ran into is the snout is just too long so i have been on the lookout for a short nose snout for the eaton but haven't had much luck there either. i don't really want to run a 4" spacer to the SC pulley off the crank. cheap eatons haven't been available lately, suppose they're getting harder to come by, at least the short snout versions aren't.
Last edited by RotaryEvolution; 01-05-12 at 03:45 PM.
#22
This sh*t burns oil!
iTrader: (7)
another issue i ran into is the snout is just too long so i have been on the lookout for a short nose snout for the eaton but haven't had much luck there either. i don't really want to run a 4" spacer to the SC pulley off the crank. cheap eatons haven't been available lately, suppose they're getting harder to come by, at least the short snout versions aren't.
#23
Ok so here is an update on everything.
I've recently acquired an 88 Vert that I'm stripping down and using for parts and selling what I don't need. I will be scrapping the shell, sadly, it has cancer. However I've salvaged the complete drivetrain, as well as some nice KYB Gas-a-Just struts to put on my FC since I've still got the original AAS suspension, and all four corners are blown, and also salvaged tails and headlights, interior pieces, aluminum hood, trunk, etc. If anyone needs anything feel free to ask if I have it, and give a reasonable offer.
However, the engine is for me, it is currently of unknown condition and since I have blown coolant seals, I'm going to pull my engine and test the one from the vert. Hopefully it is in better condition considering oil is in it, as well as some fresh coolant that poured out of the engine looking clean and pure. If the engine is good then my current engine will become a test engine for this project.
I've recently acquired an 88 Vert that I'm stripping down and using for parts and selling what I don't need. I will be scrapping the shell, sadly, it has cancer. However I've salvaged the complete drivetrain, as well as some nice KYB Gas-a-Just struts to put on my FC since I've still got the original AAS suspension, and all four corners are blown, and also salvaged tails and headlights, interior pieces, aluminum hood, trunk, etc. If anyone needs anything feel free to ask if I have it, and give a reasonable offer.
However, the engine is for me, it is currently of unknown condition and since I have blown coolant seals, I'm going to pull my engine and test the one from the vert. Hopefully it is in better condition considering oil is in it, as well as some fresh coolant that poured out of the engine looking clean and pure. If the engine is good then my current engine will become a test engine for this project.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sherff
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
9
02-24-19 12:09 PM