2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

mustang vs n/a

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 05:49 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
From: Jupiter, Florida
mustang vs n/a

Series 5 GTU N/A vs Regular 99 Mustang Auto? Who wins?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 05:54 PM
  #2  
emagdnim's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Bettendorf, IA
RX-7.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 05:54 PM
  #3  
rxspeed87's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Caldwell,ID
mustang base runs mid to low 15's I think


not for sure though
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 07:35 PM
  #4  
dre_2ooo's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
DRIVER SKILL ....err wait it's an auto

RX-7 with an incredible launch .
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 08:27 PM
  #5  
CanadianRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
From: Duncan, BC, Canada
if its a V8 the mustang will win for sure still
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 08:57 PM
  #6  
dre_2ooo's Avatar
...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
V6 = mid 15's on a good day, more driver skill than anything here...

V8 = 14.0, you will get raped.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 09:43 PM
  #7  
I wish I was driving!
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,241
Likes: 84
From: BC, Canada
Originally posted by dre_2ooo
V6 = mid 15's on a good day, more driver skill than anything here...

V8 = 14.0, you will get raped.
Agreed.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2002 | 11:39 PM
  #8  
ajsuper7's Avatar
Nothin But a G Thang
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
uhh i doubt the mustang v6 w/ auto would run anything below 16, they are pretty bad, one of my buds with a 2000 v6 auto with intake, catback exhaust, and a reprogramed ecu only ran an 8.2 0 to 60 on my gtech and my car stock ran a 8.1, thus if my car stock can beat a modded v6 stang then i have no doubt youll beat this guy
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2002 | 06:12 PM
  #9  
cwsttu's Avatar
1.3L is not that small
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1
From: Nacogdoches Tx
**** i still have my C/K chevrolet 1500 extended cab pickup with the 350 small block engine in it, i raced a 2000 standard mustang goofing off with my friends one night and twice i beat it, those v6 mustangs suck if my freakin huge truck can beat one, i say the rx7 will toast it but thats just my .02 cents
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2002 | 06:33 PM
  #10  
ponykiller's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
From: KC
I have raced a 2000 v6 automatic transmission mustang with my stock 91 5spd convertible RX7. Off the line he pulled away, but when I hit 3rd gear I blew past him.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2002 | 06:39 PM
  #11  
rxseven's Avatar
Special Dark
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
From: oklahoma
V6 convertibles suck big time. I drove a 2000 a few times. Engine makes more noise than power.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2002 | 07:59 PM
  #12  
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
We come with the Hardcore
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
... blah blah blah driver skill blah blah blah mustangs suck blah blah blah it's just an N/A...

Race and find out. Why ask?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rxlevi7
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
Sep 26, 2015 07:28 AM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
Sep 9, 2015 05:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 AM.