2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

mustang vs n/a

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-02, 05:49 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Jupiter, Florida
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mustang vs n/a

Series 5 GTU N/A vs Regular 99 Mustang Auto? Who wins?
Old 08-06-02, 05:54 PM
  #2  
Full Member

 
emagdnim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Bettendorf, IA
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RX-7.
Old 08-06-02, 05:54 PM
  #3  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
rxspeed87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mustang base runs mid to low 15's I think


not for sure though
Old 08-06-02, 07:35 PM
  #4  
...

 
dre_2ooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DRIVER SKILL ....err wait it's an auto

RX-7 with an incredible launch .
Old 08-06-02, 08:27 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

 
CanadianRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Duncan, BC, Canada
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if its a V8 the mustang will win for sure still
Old 08-06-02, 08:57 PM
  #6  
...

 
dre_2ooo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V6 = mid 15's on a good day, more driver skill than anything here...

V8 = 14.0, you will get raped.
Old 08-06-02, 09:43 PM
  #7  
I wish I was driving!

 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 5,241
Received 84 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally posted by dre_2ooo
V6 = mid 15's on a good day, more driver skill than anything here...

V8 = 14.0, you will get raped.
Agreed.
Old 08-06-02, 11:39 PM
  #8  
Nothin But a G Thang

 
ajsuper7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
uhh i doubt the mustang v6 w/ auto would run anything below 16, they are pretty bad, one of my buds with a 2000 v6 auto with intake, catback exhaust, and a reprogramed ecu only ran an 8.2 0 to 60 on my gtech and my car stock ran a 8.1, thus if my car stock can beat a modded v6 stang then i have no doubt youll beat this guy
Old 08-10-02, 06:12 PM
  #9  
1.3L is not that small

 
cwsttu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Nacogdoches Tx
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
**** i still have my C/K chevrolet 1500 extended cab pickup with the 350 small block engine in it, i raced a 2000 standard mustang goofing off with my friends one night and twice i beat it, those v6 mustangs suck if my freakin huge truck can beat one, i say the rx7 will toast it but thats just my .02 cents
Old 08-10-02, 06:33 PM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
ponykiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have raced a 2000 v6 automatic transmission mustang with my stock 91 5spd convertible RX7. Off the line he pulled away, but when I hit 3rd gear I blew past him.
Old 08-10-02, 06:39 PM
  #11  
Special Dark

 
rxseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V6 convertibles suck big time. I drove a 2000 a few times. Engine makes more noise than power.
Old 08-10-02, 07:59 PM
  #12  
We come with the Hardcore

iTrader: (2)
 
Liquid Anarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... blah blah blah driver skill blah blah blah mustangs suck blah blah blah it's just an N/A...

Race and find out. Why ask?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rxlevi7
New Member RX-7 Technical
4
09-26-15 07:28 AM
mulcryant
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
10
09-09-15 05:24 PM



Quick Reply: mustang vs n/a



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.