2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Low on power.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-03, 12:07 AM
  #1  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low on power.

I have about 2k miles on a rebuilt ported motor from Atkins. also have custom TID and gutted precat. For some reason, my car isn't nearly as fast as it should be. I know i'm making more boost but it just doesn't pull any harder than when it was stock. as a matter of fact, i was only .02 seconds quicker in the 1/4 compared to when my car was stock. i'm baffled that i'm not seeing any results. the porting is claiming to increase hp by 25%. add the intake and "high flow" cat and i should be pushing more than 230hp, at the motor of course.
Old 12-28-03, 12:30 AM
  #2  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
andrew lohaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: fl
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe it needs to be broken in. checked the coils, grounds, and all that other good stuff that can sapp power without being very obvious?
Old 12-28-03, 01:00 AM
  #3  
haiO

 
JackoliciousLegs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: mmsports.org
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
jack = noob... how do you check grounds?
Old 12-28-03, 12:11 PM
  #4  
Junior Member

 
The BIg j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have the same problem. i have an 86 n/a and it is not as fast sa it should be. i have been told this by countless people.
Old 12-28-03, 12:21 PM
  #5  
Ban Peak

iTrader: (49)
 
Molotovman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,996
Received 412 Likes on 265 Posts
Check you vacuum lines, make sure theyre all where theyre supposed to be.
Old 12-28-03, 04:02 PM
  #6  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nearly all vac lines were replaced. i did remove the acv/airpump and vacuum line spider web under the manifold. the only vac. lines that i kept were the ones attached to the throttle body(secondary lockout mechanism), and the oil injector vac lines. i believe all other lines were replaced. i had planned on adding two more grounds made 4GA power wire but haven't gotten around to it. also, turbo spins freely.
Old 12-28-03, 05:37 PM
  #7  
Displacement > Boost

 
88IntegraLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you tuned the fuel map for the increased airflow due to the ports? How about to compensate for the Walbro pump?

You can go faster in the 1/4 mile by changing those stock TII wheels for something in the 15lb range.
Old 12-29-03, 01:50 AM
  #8  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Umm. The AFM changes the fuel map for the increased flow. The fuel pressure regulator compesates for the larger fuel pump.
Old 12-29-03, 04:03 AM
  #9  
Displacement > Boost

 
88IntegraLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by fstrnyou
Umm. The AFM changes the fuel map for the increased flow. The fuel pressure regulator compesates for the larger fuel pump.
Okay, I understand that line of thinking. It's not the prevailing mindset on this board concerning turbo II's with mods, but it's your car so I just thought I would give my perspective. Even NA cars with just intake and exhaust mods have been known to pick up 10 rwhp on a dyno if they have an S-AFC that has been tuned (forum member wozoom for one).

Good luck.
Old 12-29-03, 11:34 PM
  #10  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't intend to come off like an ***. I just was under the impression that the AFM controlled fuel delivery amounts and the FPR controlled the fuel pressure in the rails.
Old 12-30-03, 07:52 AM
  #11  
Seduced by the DARK SIDE

 
SureShot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by fstrnyou
the only vac. lines that i kept were the ones attached to the throttle body(secondary lockout mechanism)
Mine was slow until I discovered the secondary throttle was not opening at all.

I removed the dashpot, cam, & holdoff diaphragm, and wired the secondary open.
The empty vac nipple in the TB made a good boost gauge source.
Old 12-30-03, 10:02 AM
  #12  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
My first though is as SureShot mentioned. The seconary throttle plates could be stuck closed.

After that, it's important to do a full tuneup. With that new of an engine, the plugs are probably fouled. Compression test would be a good start, but it can take quite a while for rebuilt engines with used housings to build up compression to what it should be. So I'd wait a few thousand more miles...
Old 12-30-03, 10:35 AM
  #13  
Lives on the Forum

iTrader: (7)
 
Sideways7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Temple, Texas (Central)
Posts: 6,596
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
With that new of an engine, the plugs are probably fouled.
So are you saying that plugs will foul faster on a newly rebuilt engine?
Old 12-30-03, 10:45 AM
  #14  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Yep, until the compression builds up and all the seals break in.
Old 12-30-03, 10:47 AM
  #15  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SureShot
Mine was slow until I discovered the secondary throttle was not opening at all.

I removed the dashpot, cam, & holdoff diaphragm, and wired the secondary open.
Well, I am getting another throttle body from another member on this forum. I'm thinking of doing a little porting and taking the secondary lockout plates out. Not sure if I should take the shaft out as well as this would require plugging some holes.

The empty vac nipple in the TB made a good boost gauge source.
You know, I never would have thought of that. I was just wondering how I'm gonna plug that port without something blowing back off under boost. I have a 4-way connector near the pressure sensor coming from the manifold and splitting 3 ways, 1 to boost guage, 1 to pressure sensor, and 1 to BOV.

So are you saying that plugs will foul faster on a newly rebuilt engine?
Yah, since compression is low on newly rebuilt motors, combustion isn't at its peak efficiency. I haven't done a compression check or looked at the plugs since I put the motor in. Sounds like it may be a good idea to do a little investigating.
Old 12-30-03, 10:51 AM
  #16  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
If you have not seen the plugs since you put the engine in, they are bad.
Old 01-02-04, 03:03 PM
  #17  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last week, I lifted the upper manifold/TB assemply and removed the lockout plates but left the shaft. And runs a little better but still not what I expect. Well, I checked the plugs this morning. They "looked" ok but I'm no expert in diagnosing a car based on spark plugs. I let the motor warm up until the needle was a little into the normal range. I went driving around to warm the motor more. I did notice and have noticed before that when I first leave the parking lot when the motor isn't to full temp but definately warm, that the car pulls very hard. And when shifting into second boost spiked to around 9 or so. But when the motor fully warms up(just less than half way up the guage) it doesn't pull as hard and boost only makes it to 7.5. Is there a reason for this. Maybe someone can shed a little light as to the reasoning behind the lower boost when the motor is hot. Oh, also ran a 4GA ground from the front of the water pump to the passenger shock tower.

Also...checked the rear compression when i got back from warming the motor. reads about 98-99. is that low for haveing around 3K on the motor? or am i right on schedule? very very rarely will the motor flood itself after driving for a while. went to zaxby's last night and when i went to leave, it wouldn't start. so i unplugged the fuel pump relay under the dash let it crank and fire up until it ran out of gas then plugged the relay back in and it fired up and i drove off. again...very rarely does it do this. is 99 pounds low enough to cause this. the fuel injectors were cleaned by RC when i installed the motor. Thanks for your help guys. I really appreciate it. And I look forward to helping you one day.

Craig
Old 01-02-04, 03:21 PM
  #18  
Displacement > Boost

 
88IntegraLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Part of the reason it may pull harder when cold is because it hasn't had a chance to heat soak the intake manifold and IC. Just about every car I have driven has been that way. As for the boost problem, I wouldn't know. I'm boostless!
Old 01-02-04, 10:47 PM
  #19  
Rotary Enthusiast

Thread Starter
 
fstrnyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a friend of mine said the same thing. and it's possible but the intercooler isn't doing anything when i'm in first and second gear anyways. so, even if it wasn't heat soaked, it's not acting like an intercooler. oh, and my car idles for about 6-10 minutes before it gets into the normal range. so i'd figure that the intercooler might be hot. oh well. was just hoping it was a bad sensor or something that i could replace to make it faster. i know, get a FMIC. don't have the money...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
Cameron38
1st Gen General Discussion
2
09-19-15 11:45 PM
MattGold
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
3
09-09-15 02:20 PM



Quick Reply: Low on power.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 AM.