2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

help me choose a turbo for my n/a

Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #26  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
How? Where did you find a gt35R, maifold, intercooler, and all the plumbing plus the extra fuel for $500?
That's not what you said, you said you can't run 12psi on the stock block for under $500 (for long)
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:39 PM
  #27  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
That's not what you said, you said you can't run 12psi on the stock block for under $500.
That's not what I said, either. I said it won't be reliable...hence the "for long" statement. You can run 20psi or more on a stock block for $3.50.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:42 PM
  #28  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Reread it. I ran it, for long.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:43 PM
  #29  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
I've read it. I don't have a problem reading.

Originally Posted by Makenzie71
How?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:43 PM
  #30  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
That's not what I said, either. I said it won't be reliable...hence the "for long" statement. You can run 20psi or more on a stock block for $3.50.
This whole argument about the 500 dollars is moot when it comes to the 12psi comment. You did not read what was said earlier carefully enough, and assumed Iceblue was asking about 12psi for 500 dollars, which he wasn't. Therefore you were the beginning of this issue...

This thread is getting off topic, though, you/me/sonicrat can argue over PM if you have anything more to say.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #31  
RETed's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 22
From: n
Save $5000 (double that if you're not doing all the work yourself) and then come back and ask us the same question again...

You're not going to come close to a JZA80.
Full exhaust, FMIC, boost controller to 15psi, intake, ported motor will not touch a JZA80 with BPU mods.
You need at least a bigger turbo...

Stop smoking the crack.
You need to come down to reality on your project.


-Ted
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:49 PM
  #32  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by dDuB
This whole argument about the 500 dollars is moot when it comes to the 12psi comment. You did not read what was said earlier carefully enough, and assumed Iceblue was asking about 12psi for 500 dollars, which he wasn't. Therefore you were the beginning of this issue...
Actually it's quite relevent to the topic at hand because it covers the limitations of budget turbo'ing the N/A block. It doesn' matter who asks the questions.

What's a waste of time is people having to ask the same question 5 times to get an answer...

Originally Posted by RETed
Save $5000 (double that if you're not doing all the work yourself) and then come back and ask us the same question again...

You're not going to come close to a JZA80.
Full exhaust, FMIC, boost controller to 15psi, intake, ported motor will not touch a JZA80 with BPU mods.
You need at least a bigger turbo...

Stop smoking the crack.
You need to come down to reality on your project.


-Ted
exactly.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:52 PM
  #33  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by Makenzie71
Actually it's quite relevent to the topic at hand because it covers the limitations of budget turbo'ing the N/A block. It doesn' matter who asks the questions..

Actually... it seems to me he was only saying $500 for a USED turbo. Never said anything else about the rest of the budget

Originally Posted by BklynRX7
Im looking for a used unit and trying not to spend over $500 on the turbo itself but i can afford slightly higher.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 11:56 PM
  #34  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by dDuB
Actually... it seems to me he was only saying $500 for a USED turbo. Never said anything else about the rest of the budget

True...got caught up in the posts following I suppose. $500 for a good T04 or similar doesn't seem too bad, but I'm curious as to the extent of the rest of his budget...as well as running 12lbs reliably for less that $500 in support.

Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:00 AM
  #35  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Yah I think that's how most of this thread ended up.

Anyways... 500 on a used turbo doesn't seem bad, it can be doable with a BNR hybrid for example. The rest of the setup, though, would be better to have more money spent on it. It CAN be done for cheap, but personally I wouldn't want to. I suppose if you can weld up your own downpipe, make your own intercooler piping, use a starion or similar intercooler, bigger injectors/pump, and an s-afc with the hybrid turbo it can be done for relatively cheap. Is this the best setup, though? Probably not.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:07 AM
  #36  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

Originally Posted by dDuB
Actually... it seems to me he was only saying $500 for a USED turbo. Never said anything else about the rest of the budget
I was getting so pissed reading the responses till I saw ddub was the ONLY person to realize this. I am planning on spending approx $2000 in total.

so far these are my plans:

TII manifolds ported to fit 6pi slots

used fmic of good size

megasquirt and spark (will be looking for an experienced builder soon)

wideband O2 kit for tuning

Ill work out the injector sizes after I know what turbo/boost ill be running

Its not really about beating slightly modded m3's or supras or any other car really, its just that riding in/ driving those cars made me crave similar power. But I dont have a similar budget.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:13 AM
  #37  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by BklynRX7
TII manifolds ported to fit 6pi slots
Out of curiosity, why do this? The exhaust manifold is the same. Use your stock intake manifold assembly...just have a 2" spacer built to bring the turbo out to clear the 6-port actuators.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #38  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Because the spacers suck, and it whacks the inner frame rail, not to mention the intake design sucks.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:21 AM
  #39  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
Because the spacers suck, and it whacks the inner frame rail, not to mention the intake design sucks.
Why do the spacers suck? Lots of people here, including myself, have built and used them without any problems. I've never seen any kind of clearance issues with propperly built ones, either.

The TII intake isn't exactly a work of art, either. Neither is superior considering your application, and the stock one will be cheaper and just as effective.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:29 AM
  #40  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
b/c runing a 2in spacer on a stock mani will make the turbo hit the frame. If you spend the money and have a SS mani built then that solves the issue. Then your back to the even worse 4 90DEG bends in the intake manifold :-/
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:30 AM
  #41  
BklynRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
King of the Loop
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,620
Likes: 1
From: brooklyn, New York
Arrow

Originally Posted by Makenzie71
Out of curiosity, why do this? The exhaust manifold is the same. Use your stock intake manifold assembly...just have a 2" spacer built to bring the turbo out to clear the 6-port actuators.
From what i have read, been told and can imagine there is less fabrication involved. You dont have to worry about denting the wheel well to get the turbo to fit, im not positive but ive been told the DP will line up with the n/a exhaust system, so the only real custom work ill be doing is the oil, coolant and intercooler lines. I no longer have to worry about electronically controlling my 5/6 ports or VDI. PLus The TII manifolds were made for boosting so it seems more logical in my mind(not a fact) that they would be more suited for a boosted application.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:39 AM
  #42  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by BklynRX7
From what i have read, been told and can imagine there is less fabrication involved. You dont have to worry about denting the wheel well to get the turbo to fit, im not positive but ive been told the DP will line up with the n/a exhaust system, so the only real custom work ill be doing is the oil, coolant and intercooler lines. I no longer have to worry about electronically controlling my 5/6 ports or VDI. PLus The TII manifolds were made for boosting so it seems more logical in my mind(not a fact) that they would be more suited for a boosted application.
Wll I can tell you that the NA and turbo exhausts line up with the propper cat combination, but everyone is going to have a different opinion or experience with the rest.

I do know that rabid chimp sells a nifty oil return for custom turbo applications...might hit them up. They hand;e mostly MKII supra stuff, but the oil setup they sell should pretty well be iniversal.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:45 AM
  #43  
iceblue's Avatar
Passing life by
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 2
From: Scotland, USA
BklynRX7 - well no denting of the wheel well is right but you have to notch out the frame or the compressor will hit the frame and not fit and even then the compressor is insanly close to the UIM. With no spacer the turbo will never fit. If you use a TII mani as you said and have it port matched no wories just bolt up the mani and turbo and fab your lines.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:52 AM
  #44  
staticguitar313's Avatar
R.I.P. Icemark
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 1
From: gilbert, arizona
talk to sonikrat about his turbo kit, its pricey but you'll be well off with it.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 12:57 AM
  #45  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
The S5 hotside is too wide, and *WILL* hit the frame and won't even bolt up with a spacer, and you'll STILL barely clear the ACV. The s4 will fit in there with mimal clearance and will smack the frame rail on sharp changes/vibrations (and the wastegate doesn't fit properly and has to be modified), not to mention that stock downpipes don't work and so forth. Considering the alternatives (new manifolds, hacking tII manifolds, etc), the stock intakes is the worse of them all.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 01:01 AM
  #46  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
I just find it odd that people have had clearance issues with the spacer unless it's built straight out from the block...which if you think that's wise you probably shouldn't be considering the idea. I had LOTS of room on everyone I've built.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 01:08 AM
  #47  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
If you feel like moving it out and forward and cut a whole bunch of mandrel piping to get it equal, and then reinforce the entire thing or run a rod down to the engine mount bolt to keep it from sagging, indeed, but there are easier and better ways. I told everyone turbo n/a's would become the new trend!
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 01:11 AM
  #48  
Makenzie71's Avatar
...94% correct.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 2
From: High Texas
Originally Posted by SonicRaT
If you feel like moving it out and forward and cut a whole bunch of mandrel piping to get it equal, and then reinforce the entire thing or run a rod down to the engine mount bolt to keep it from sagging, indeed, but there are easier and better ways. I told everyone turbo n/a's would become the new trend!
I only moved out 1.5" and down .75" and got good results.

NA-T's are great, when done propperly.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 01:15 AM
  #49  
SonicRaT's Avatar
Super Raterhater
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 10,630
Likes: 3
From: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
That they are, I haven't found anybody else going quite as crazy as me yet though, I know Aaron's going GT35R, which is what I used to have, can't wait to complete this 42R setup!
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2005 | 06:31 AM
  #50  
toxic_d's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: NY
The new trend? They've been done since FBs
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 PM.