A fun day @ BNR Supercars (pics)
Thread Starter
I HATE sleepy eyes
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
A fun day @ BNR Supercars (pics)
So for some strange reason I posted it in the test area...hopefully the mods will move it here where it belongs...till then: BNR Supercars
sorry bout the linking---Nick
sorry bout the linking---Nick
Thread Starter
I HATE sleepy eyes
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Ill let Bryan give you guys the tech, I wouldnt wanna screw it up! 
In the midst of all that goofin around we did yesterday, none of us went to get the clutch...so now itll be monday before we get it 
In the midst of all that goofin around we did yesterday, none of us went to get the clutch...so now itll be monday before we get it
Trending Topics
Well, Ted the reasons I went w/ the 3rd gen upper intake maniflod are 1. It has a slightly larger throttle body and very slightly larger 2ndary runners. 2. TB does not lead directly to a large plenum w/ a 90 deg "wall" inline w/ TB- in short it seems to be more designed for a boost application, not a compromise for off boost operation. 3. It has very direct runners- made it easy to remove all bumps and polish the etire length inside all runners w/ only a 10" rod and emery/crocus cloth on a die grinder! Very smooth! 4. I think it looks much better when using non top mount IC and it is popular in Japan - yes, I do try to emulate the Japanese aftermarket trends on my Japanese car.
Only (possible) downsides I saw were 1. It had much smaller primary runners. I ported them larger up to the bend and modified the bends radius when I matched it to my 89+ lower mani- so probably no problem there. 2. After matching to my 89+ lower mani. there is a slight increase in runner diameter on the primary runners as it transitions between mani.s-so some drop in velocity there. Ian
Only (possible) downsides I saw were 1. It had much smaller primary runners. I ported them larger up to the bend and modified the bends radius when I matched it to my 89+ lower mani- so probably no problem there. 2. After matching to my 89+ lower mani. there is a slight increase in runner diameter on the primary runners as it transitions between mani.s-so some drop in velocity there. Ian
Thread Starter
I HATE sleepy eyes
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Im not sure exactly what Rocky (owner of red TII) would take for it...but if anyone is seriously interested, I can look into it for you. Ted, those turbos are both stage 2 BNR upgrades, (will support 325 RWHP each)
---Nick
---Nick
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Well see if it makes some power! I want 600 RW. That would be fun to drive around on when I feel like being scared shitless!! I am currently shopping for a Ford 8.8 rear end set up. They are around 5-600 bones. June 1 is the dead line b/c Goldie is gettin a nice paint job and fixin! She'll be as good as new!!!
That would be fun to drive around on when I feel like being scared shitless!! I am currently shopping for a Ford 8.8 rear end set up. They are around 5-600 bones. June 1 is the dead line b/c Goldie is gettin a nice paint job and fixin! She'll be as good as new!!!
Laying Down Rotary Law
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 1
From: central florida
stage 2? damm got pics of a stage 4?
out of curiosity :=P
what is the biggest upgrade
not taking into account clearence issues
Can you do T-66 Upgrade in theory?
except a T series are Mid-Shafts
and stock are small shafts
so 62-1 would be the biggest you can go eh
out of curiosity :=P
what is the biggest upgrade
not taking into account clearence issues
Can you do T-66 Upgrade in theory?
except a T series are Mid-Shafts
and stock are small shafts
so 62-1 would be the biggest you can go eh
Last edited by kabooski; May 5, 2002 at 10:09 AM.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
I can do a t66 in a t04B housing, but that is extensive machine work . It would definately be a sleeper! It would be difficult to go bigger than a P trim in the stock Turbine housing... The bigger Turbine wheel helps keep the boost steady, but when you get so much power going throught that turbine housing, it will boost spike.. A t66 is too big for the design of the series 5 modified manifold. Thats why I don't do it.... Now if I could put a q trim in the stock turbine housing, that would be awesome. Then the T66 would work .
. It would definately be a sleeper! It would be difficult to go bigger than a P trim in the stock Turbine housing... The bigger Turbine wheel helps keep the boost steady, but when you get so much power going throught that turbine housing, it will boost spike.. A t66 is too big for the design of the series 5 modified manifold. Thats why I don't do it.... Now if I could put a q trim in the stock turbine housing, that would be awesome. Then the T66 would work .
Laying Down Rotary Law
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 1
From: central florida
Well The T-66's come in P-trim
with Q-trim as a option no?
as for boost spike
I would add a deltagate (I got mine new for $135 on ebay )
what about a 62-1?
with Q-trim as a option no?
as for boost spike
I would add a deltagate (I got mine new for $135 on ebay )
what about a 62-1?
Last edited by kabooski; May 5, 2002 at 02:03 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Clanton, Al.
Originally posted by BoostedRotors
Im not sure exactly what Rocky (owner of red TII) would take for it...but if anyone is seriously interested, I can look into it for you. Ted, those turbos are both stage 2 BNR upgrades, (will support 325 RWHP each)
---Nick
Im not sure exactly what Rocky (owner of red TII) would take for it...but if anyone is seriously interested, I can look into it for you. Ted, those turbos are both stage 2 BNR upgrades, (will support 325 RWHP each)
---Nick
(draggin this thread out of the weeds.)
How bout that red turbo? Not yours, the one for sale.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whizzybang
Naturally Aspirated Performance Forum
21
Feb 10, 2017 12:08 PM
