FD turbos on a FC
QC Motorsports
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
From: Austin, tx
Originally Posted by t-von
Now now Ted!
When was the last time you drove and Fd with properly funcional twin turbos? I would let you drive mine if you were closer. They are the ****.
When was the last time you drove and Fd with properly funcional twin turbos? I would let you drive mine if you were closer. They are the ****.It would be cheaper to go with a trick hybrid and get more power than do FD stock TT. Too much money you would have to throw at fab work.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,792
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by t-von
And why is this may I ask? My original engine has over 100k and still pulls hard as hell. Is my engine a freak of nature? Nope I just truely understand what it takes to make them last. At 50k, the internal parts are know were near out of spec. If they are only lasting that long, it's because people are driving around with improperly tuned/modified/carbon infested engines period point blank end of story.
. Water injection is the boosted rotary's friend......
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by RETed
What a bunch of crap...
-Ted
-Ted
Bryan@BNR
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,792
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by RETed
What a bunch of crap...
-Ted
-Ted
I noticed you didnt respond to my reply to your inflammatory post. What's wrong, cat got your tongue
?
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,792
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Oh, also-when I was referring to the rwhp output on stock twins, I was quoting Chris and Ari over at Rotary Performance. I think I trust their judgement over yours. Nothing personal
.
.
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
You sure do enjoy using that word.
I noticed you didnt respond to my reply to your inflammatory post. What's wrong, cat got your tongue
?
I noticed you didnt respond to my reply to your inflammatory post. What's wrong, cat got your tongue
?Don't take that as an insult.
BNR hinted on the water injection thing...
BDC made 499 at the wheels, and I believe that was without water injection.
Hell, that was on a 13BT block, not a 13B-REW one.
So according to your statements, that motor should not be running by now?
Why don't you two go compare notes and leave me out of this.
Since you're such pals with Mr. Kan, maybe you should ask him?
Ask the FD guys?
Oh you gotta be kidding me.
Most of them are idiots in the first place.
-Ted
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,792
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by RETed
Nah, it's just that working 16 hours days kinda has priority of replying to you.
Don't take that as an insult.
BNR hinted on the water injection thing...
BDC made 499 at the wheels, and I believe that was without water injection.
Hell, that was on a 13BT block, not a 13B-REW one.
So according to your statements, that motor should not be running by now?
Why don't you two go compare notes and leave me out of this.
Since you're such pals with Mr. Kan, maybe you should ask him?
Ask the FD guys?
Oh you gotta be kidding me.
Most of them are idiots in the first place.
-Ted
Don't take that as an insult.
BNR hinted on the water injection thing...
BDC made 499 at the wheels, and I believe that was without water injection.
Hell, that was on a 13BT block, not a 13B-REW one.
So according to your statements, that motor should not be running by now?
Why don't you two go compare notes and leave me out of this.
Since you're such pals with Mr. Kan, maybe you should ask him?
Ask the FD guys?
Oh you gotta be kidding me.
Most of them are idiots in the first place.
-Ted
I don't expect you to admit that you're wrong. This all started with your post about the stock twins being crap, so right there you lose all credibility.
<edited for flameing>
Last edited by Icemark; Feb 3, 2006 at 11:39 PM.
Originally Posted by GoodfellaFD3S
Nice smokescreen.
I don't expect you to admit that you're wrong. This all started with your post about the stock twins being crap, so right there you lose all credibility.
<edited for flameing>
I don't expect you to admit that you're wrong. This all started with your post about the stock twins being crap, so right there you lose all credibility.
<edited for flameing>
I guess you never read the rules about insulting other members and keeping your incindary comments to yourself.
Respect for BDC?
Okay, now I know where you're coming from.
Stock FD twins are crap?
Sure, I still stand by that statement.
Is it worth the $3,000+ that the stock Mazda dealer wants to replace them for?
No.
Almost any single will smoke the twins in terms of power output, even broad power range.
The only think a single is not going to beat the stock twins is how early it boosts.
Well, the dyno graphs don't lie, and the power delivery is surely not linear.
In fact, I know a former FD owner who used to bitch about how crappy the power delivery was with the stock twins - think about it.
Welp, you just affirmed what I think about most FD owners...<edited for flaming>
Nice way to skirt the 499hp question - that makes you full of ****.
Now go away an go play with your FD "elistists" in the 3rd gen section.
You obviously don't belong in here.
Go away.
-Ted
Last edited by Icemark; Feb 3, 2006 at 11:40 PM.
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 30,792
Likes: 646
From: FL-->NJ/NYC again!
Originally Posted by RETed
Ah, talk about smokescreen...
I guess you never read the rules about insulting other members and keeping your incindary comments to yourself.
Respect for BDC?
Okay, now I know where you're coming from.
Stock FD twins are crap?
Sure, I still stand by that statement.
Is it worth the $3,000+ that the stock Mazda dealer wants to replace them for?
No.
Almost any single will smoke the twins in terms of power output, even broad power range.
The only think a single is not going to beat the stock twins is how early it boosts.
Well, the dyno graphs don't lie, and the power delivery is surely not linear.
In fact, I know a former FD owner who used to bitch about how crappy the power delivery was with the stock twins - think about it.
Welp, you just affirmed what I think about most FD owners...<edited for flaming>
Nice way to skirt the 499hp question - that makes you full of ****.
Now go away an go play with your FD "elistists" in the 3rd gen section.
You obviously don't belong in here.
Go away.
-Ted
I guess you never read the rules about insulting other members and keeping your incindary comments to yourself.
Respect for BDC?
Okay, now I know where you're coming from.
Stock FD twins are crap?
Sure, I still stand by that statement.
Is it worth the $3,000+ that the stock Mazda dealer wants to replace them for?
No.
Almost any single will smoke the twins in terms of power output, even broad power range.
The only think a single is not going to beat the stock twins is how early it boosts.
Well, the dyno graphs don't lie, and the power delivery is surely not linear.
In fact, I know a former FD owner who used to bitch about how crappy the power delivery was with the stock twins - think about it.
Welp, you just affirmed what I think about most FD owners...<edited for flaming>
Nice way to skirt the 499hp question - that makes you full of ****.
Now go away an go play with your FD "elistists" in the 3rd gen section.
You obviously don't belong in here.
Go away.
-Ted
Bye, off I go to play with all the idiot elitist FD owners with their crap stock turbos, lol.
Last edited by Icemark; Feb 3, 2006 at 11:41 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







