2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

FD manifold on FC Q's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-03, 12:31 PM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Fatty_FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FD manifold on FC Q's

After seeing Blue TII's writeup on the FD3S manifold to FC turbo conversion, i would also like to install an FD manifold and throttle body on my 89 T2.

I already have FMIC, engine management, turbo upgrade, exhaust, etc....

Does anyone know how much extra flow the FD manifold/TB has over the Turbo FC manifold/TB? Im not concerned with making the installation work so much as i want to get an idea of what kind of improvements i can expect.

I know that Soul and Blue TII have worked on this, so if they happen to see this post please give some info! Thanks

Graham
Old 02-25-03, 03:37 PM
  #2  
Yar-Har-Har

 
Fitness Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nashville, 37217
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would also like to know exactly what you gain from doing this.....im holding this in the back of my head as a possible mod to do for my 88 TII
Old 02-25-03, 05:34 PM
  #3  
Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
hIGGI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Czech Republic [www.rx7cz.net]
Posts: 4,985
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
http://www.teamfc3s.org/forum/showth...&threadid=7789

i should get one for me too soon (month or so)

once i`ll get it, i will work out with my CNC machining hookups some drop in adapters for adapting FD UIM on S4 TII motors...
Old 02-27-03, 01:49 PM
  #4  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Where's the link to the write-up?&nbsp We just did it on a friend's car, and it was a royal pain in the ***.&nbsp The front brackets need to be cut, as they interfere with the secondary fuel rail.&nbsp As the link states, the TB side interferes with the stock oil filler neck.&nbsp yes, you can bolt it on with a filing of the holes on the UIM, but the ports are significantly off.&nbsp I'd like to see back-toback dyno runs of this mod, as it's not worth it in my book.


-Ted
Old 02-27-03, 02:09 PM
  #5  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Fatty_FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northern California
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, if you could find the link to the project, that would be great. I wanted to know any hang ups on doing this mod. I also want to know if its even worth all that trouble! Seems like the maifold and TB are better designs on the FD, hence my interest in the upgrade.
Thanks for your response ted, help with that link if you can!

Graham
Old 02-27-03, 02:13 PM
  #6  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
The only thing I can offer right now is that the FD TB uses larger bores in the secondaries.

Paul Ko's infamour write-up:&nbsp http://fc3s-pro.com/TECH/SWAP/FD3S/BTvsBREW.html


-Ted
Old 02-27-03, 02:25 PM
  #7  
I dont know a damn thing

iTrader: (1)
 
Rotorific's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Evans, Ga
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Would NA's have any advantage to this?
Old 02-27-03, 04:29 PM
  #8  
Fixed the wheelhop

iTrader: (9)
 
bob13bt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the turbo engine sees little power advantage, I doubt an N/A would see ANY.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Andrew7dg
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
08-06-17 01:41 PM
eplusz
General Rotary Tech Support
15
10-07-15 04:04 PM



Quick Reply: FD manifold on FC Q's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 AM.