2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

FC handling differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:08 AM
  #1  
knightkarr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, CA
FC handling differences?

I've read that the TII doesn't handle as good as the n/a's. Why is that? and if so, can it be made to handle equally for cheap?
Carlos
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:10 AM
  #2  
Bebesito21's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
its heavier....i dont know about cheap but it can be made to handle with the best of them.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:16 AM
  #3  
knightkarr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, CA
oh yeah, that makes sense. thanks Bebesito21
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:26 AM
  #4  
ra ra rotory's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: "You take my car, I take your knee caps"
im not sure but maybe.. boost........ ya know more power kicks the rear out a little more.. just a thing to think about
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:27 AM
  #5  
Sir Coolness
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
The Turbo II and n/a are practically the same car, it might weigh 30 - 50 lbs more, but it's still faster and that weight isn't going to have any real effect on the cars ability to handle on the street or track for that matter...
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 01:32 AM
  #6  
knightkarr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, CA
so what would you say the handling diff. are due to, Brian?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 03:11 AM
  #7  
Dan H's Avatar
Zoom Zoom Boom!
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Which NA? I think an open diff and the LSD makes a big difference in handling. Of course, all TII's had LSD's.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 05:38 AM
  #8  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
The N/As are typically slightly better balanced than the T2, but unless you drove one against the other you would hardly notice any difference. Of course most T2 owners would claim their cars were no different or better.

Remember the S4 T2 already has the heavy duty suspension of the 86-87 Sport, and 88 GTU, while the S5 is the same as any other coupe.

And Brian is wrong about the weights... the T2 on average weighed about 150-200lbs more than a compairable coupe. The 10th AE (for example) was within 40 lbs of the 'vert. That means that the difference is about the weight of a adult male in the passengers seat. Most people can feel a handling and power difference between having a passenger and not having one.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 07:16 AM
  #9  
leatherseatcovers's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: SouthEast
Something else to consider when comparing the two cars to each other. They are both atleast 12 years old. The suspensions are going to be in different provided they are both still stock. When you mod them they will be closer to each other. But the biggest deciding factor on how the car handles is the driver that is controlling it.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 10:46 AM
  #10  
Terrh's Avatar
STUCK. I got SNOWNED!!!!!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,737
Likes: 20
From: Windsor, On
Icemark: What's a vert weigh? My car is 2890lb with a full tank of gas, so about 2800 dry. That's bone stock, +15 years of road crap attached to the bottom of it
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2003 | 11:51 AM
  #11  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally posted by Terrh
Icemark: What's a vert weigh? My car is 2890lb with a full tank of gas, so about 2800 dry. That's bone stock, +15 years of road crap attached to the bottom of it
My 88 'vert with a T2 engine and drive train, with no real weight reduction; weighs 2920 wet (3/4 of a tank) according to the local scale. Figure about 5-6lb per gallon in gas.

But 88 and 89 non P package equipped 'verts weighed stock about 2860 on arrival to the port according to a couple of the the window stickers people have posted here. P package verts jumped up to 2980 (leather, cruise, tilt wheel, upgraded CPU, auto tranny, etc).

But they got really fat in 90-91, with a US spec 'vert weighing over 3045 for manual tranny versions and 3105 for automatics.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
Sep 16, 2018 07:16 PM
toplessFC3Sman
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
6
Mar 20, 2018 01:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.