2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

engine build... s4 8.5 or s5 9.0:1 rotors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 11:03 PM
  #1  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
engine build... s4 8.5 or s5 9.0:1 rotors?

i will be rebuilding my engine soon and i was just looking for some input from the DIYers around here who have done a rebuild. specifically on a 300+whp turbo motor. i am thinking i want the extra leeway from detonation with the 8.5 rotors, but i also want the lighter weight 9.0 rotors.......
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #2  
jreynish's Avatar
New Project on the Way...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 6
From: Yellowknife, NT
S5's
More low end power and more torque overall... and if you run turbo, then faster spool of the turbocharger.
Good Luck
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2005 | 11:59 PM
  #3  
neu's Avatar
neu
*** i love duct tape
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
yes, definently go with s5 rotors
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 12:19 AM
  #4  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
S4 n/a rotors, duh. And I'm serious too

You have standalone and a bunch of fuel, you should be able to tune it just fine with higher comp N/A rotors. I mean they're only 9.4:1, not *too* much more than the s5 TII ones. Now s5 n/a ones might be too much to tune with, but s4's are lower, I'd go with s4 N/A rotors.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 12:50 AM
  #5  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
ok, how about some BENEFITS of using the lower compression rotors?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 12:54 AM
  #6  
ddub's Avatar
i am legendary
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,478
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Yah yah. Sure it's less prone to detonation or easier to tune, but come on man you have standalone and a bunch of fuel, get NA rotors

Kevin is building a half bridge FD with NA rotors from what I recall
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 01:00 AM
  #7  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
i'm gonna drive down there and roll it up on one rotor
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 02:47 AM
  #8  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
i'm gonna drive down there and roll it up on one rotor
I think you've been "rolling up" something different by the sound of it...put the pipe down y0.

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 03:00 AM
  #9  
eriksseven's Avatar
Make Money.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,137
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
l0l
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 07:09 AM
  #10  
pengarufoo's Avatar
The mystery of the prize.
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 832
Likes: 2
From: Bay area
you can run more boost on the lower compression rotors ultimately.

you can also run more timing advance on the lower compression rotors.

However, 8.4 is pretty low. 9:1 is not exactly high, I would prefer the 9:1 setup especially considering you are probably not going to be pushing the boost limits, and will probably prefer the quicker spool up, improved response, and also improved part throttle performance higher compression will net you. These cars are already pretty dead @ low rpm without boost, a bit more CR will help.

Just be careful with the tuning like always.

so yea, my vote goes for the 9:1 rotors, hell even the FD came with this CR from factory.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 11:01 AM
  #11  
rhythmfunk's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
I have a 87 T2 with a blown rear apex. Since Im gong to be doing a rebuild...are you guys saying its better to use S5 rotors from a t2 or S4 na rotors over stock? I dont have a stand alone so is this still something I should consider?

Want:
13b t with street port/polish
T04
dp, mp, e
720cc injectors
tandom fuel pump
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 03:07 PM
  #12  
C. Ludwig's Avatar
www.lms-efi.com
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 150
From: Floyds Knobs. IN
Please tell me you didn't pop the new car already.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #13  
Rxmfn7's Avatar
Do a barrel roll!
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,529
Likes: 2
From: Lower Burrell, PA
Originally Posted by C. Ludwig
Please tell me you didn't pop the new car already.
Yep...
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #14  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
i would put the 9.0's in my engine and i only have a SAFC and MBC, the difference will not be huge but enough to make it well worth it, the drawbacks are not enough to compromise anything.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 09:45 PM
  #15  
C. Ludwig's Avatar
www.lms-efi.com
Tenured Member: 25 Years
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,269
Likes: 150
From: Floyds Knobs. IN
I have a pair of low comp turbo rotors I'll part with. Think one needs a bearing. I'd have to look at them to be sure. I might also have the low comp NA rotors. I'd guess at least one of your current rotors is good. So the cheap thing is probably going to be finding a high comp turbo rotor to match.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 12:25 AM
  #16  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
i also have a blown jspec s5 TII engine sitting in the garage with a good rotor and housing and plates. so i have 2 good 9.0 rotors and 2 great housings, i was just thinking of downgrading for "safety" purposes. and i'm sure the low-end torque increase going from 8.5 to 9.0 is neglegible.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 12:40 AM
  #17  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
I've built all kinds of engines with both and I'll tell you that I can't really tell that much difference in either. The older rotors and flywheel are a hair heavier, and that (to me) gives the sensation of more low end torque and ability to pull out from a stop (more rotating mass stores more energy). But you can tell a slight difference with the s5 rotors and flywheel, the thing tends to have a bit more throttle response, which I attribute to the weight difference (think lightweight flywheel vs. stock flywheel). Generally, higher compression makes for a slightly quicker spool, too. BUt, with all else being the same, if I were going for high power, I'd run the 8.5's. If I was running a stock or mildly modded car, I'd run whatever I had in my hand.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 02:04 AM
  #18  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
well, at most it will see 320whp, so it doesnt need to be crazy or anything... and i was thinking about getting a lightweight flywheel during this project so i'm sure that would cover up any loss of throttle response. and the s4 TII parts are a dime a dozen. kevin you wanna buy some s5 TII stuff?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 02:07 AM
  #19  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Lives on the Forum
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,576
Likes: 27
From: Morristown, TN (east of Knoxville)
You just bring everything you've got and we'll talk it over
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 02:11 AM
  #20  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
lets talk it over with some sex. oh god

i was actually planning on doing a rebuild myself to gain a little more experience/respect for my engine/setup....... that and i cant afford any labor this time.

Last edited by jacobcartmill; Feb 10, 2005 at 02:13 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 08:46 AM
  #21  
Jager's Avatar
Tear you apart
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,891
Likes: 38
From: Bemidji Minnesota
Originally Posted by jacobcartmill
lets talk it over with some sex. oh god

i was actually planning on doing a rebuild myself to gain a little more experience/respect for my engine/setup....... that and i cant afford any labor this time.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 01:25 PM
  #22  
Mark'sMazda's Avatar
stop stealing my avatar
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Canton MI
I know it's not an apples to apples compairison, but I went from a stock port s4 motor, to an agressivly ported, s5 engine with a 9lb flywheel. The difference was huge, turbo spools much faster, throtle responce is far better, im very happy.

that said, go w/the s5 rotor/light flywheel setup.

Kevin, I dissagree about the loss of low end tq. If you mean, starting from a dead stop, up hill, yes the s4 setup felt stronger. However if you mean pull from 1500-3k, from my experence, the s5 setup w/light flywheel is a lot better.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 03:10 AM
  #23  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
i was planning on doing a lightweight flywheel regardless... i'm still not sure what to do
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 04:39 AM
  #24  
SideWindeRx7's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
use the low compression rotors if you plan on boosting 25+ psi
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 02:32 AM
  #25  
jacobcartmill's Avatar
Thread Starter
just dont care.
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,387
Likes: 4
From: Nashville, TN
i dont plan on going over 15-16
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM.