2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Dual intercoolers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-02, 01:32 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Kanaida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dual intercoolers?

Okay, I'm going out on a limb here... I'm pretty much curious... Is it possible to run two intercoolers. One front mount, one top mount? Why I'm asking... Okay, there's always the comparison. Top mount is for autoX, and fm is for drag. TM has the heat sink prob, fm has the prob of blocking the radiator. my thinking... If fm's block the radiator, why not get a small intercooler for the front, and then keep the top mount? probably because you don't need both... but wouldn't a fm get beaucoup more air than the tm? I don't know.. So I figure, run both, get the best of both worlds... So, it'd probably be expensive as hell right? **** loads for piping, and it would take a LONG *** time for the air to circulate right? I'm just trying to figure things out. I know... I'm getting carried away..


-Kanaida
Old 04-29-02, 01:55 AM
  #2  
I'm a boost creep...

 
NZConvertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 15,608
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Um, you'd probably just end up getting the worst of both worlds! Long pipes, blocked radiator, heat soak, four tanks to flow through...
Old 04-29-02, 02:00 AM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
Ranzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Memphis, Japan
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well a FMIC does block the radiator but not enough to cause any problems. Running a top mount a front mount would not give many if any benefits as the top mount would still be soaking up all the heat from the engine and would transfer this heat to the intake before entering the engine.

It would not be cost effective at all with all the piping. The top mount reall isn't good for AutoX, a front mount would be better than a top mount in any situation I could imagine. The only thing that my be better for DRAG RACING is a water cooled intercooler.
Old 04-29-02, 02:38 AM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
BadBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Guam
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yup more weight too
Old 04-29-02, 03:04 AM
  #5  
Back from teh deadly!

 
adamlewis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Louisville KY 40299
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FMIC + Water Wetter + Fluidyne = God
Old 04-29-02, 02:02 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
Kanaida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
water cooled intercoolers

Okay, that's cool. I was just wonderin' about the duals.. I thought it might be a little over the top. But that's cool. Moving on. Water cooled intercoolers? You must explain... How do they function? Recycle water through the core or what? And are they more of a bitch to install? They've got to be more expensive obviously, but are they worth the effort of install (if there is any difference from a normal ic) and money as opposed to a normal fmic? new world to me.. I'm just looking to soak up knowledge...


-Kanaida
Old 04-29-02, 02:43 PM
  #7  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Top mount intercoolers suck no matter how you look at them. On the FC, they function more as an interheater since they soak heat from the engine, and the scoop is poorly placed and gets very little air at speed...

Front mounts don't block very much air...Look through one and you'll see what I mean...Best benifit would be to go with a large front mount.

Air-water intercoolers are pretty decent, and the intercooler itself is very compact and can be mounted nearly anywhere...You then run water piping to a small radiator that is ideally located in front of the main radiator...Again, very easy to mount due to the thin water pipes instead of fat air pipes...Of course you need a pump and somewiring as well...Heavier than an air-air intercooler, but the advantages above make it very appealing...
Old 04-29-02, 02:53 PM
  #8  
Engine, Not Motor

iTrader: (1)
 
Aaron Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 29,789
Likes: 0
Received 108 Likes on 91 Posts
Top mount intercoolers suck no matter how you look at them. On the FC, they function more as an interheater since they soak heat from the engine, and the scoop is poorly placed and gets very little air at speed...

Front mounts don't block very much air...Look through one and you'll see what I mean...Best benifit would be to go with a large front mount.

Air-water intercoolers are pretty decent, and the intercooler itself is very compact and can be mounted nearly anywhere...You then run water piping to a small radiator that is ideally located in front of the main radiator...Again, very easy to mount due to the thin water pipes instead of fat air pipes...Of course you need a pump and somewiring as well...Heavier than an air-air intercooler, but the advantages above make it very appealing...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.