2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Do I REALLY Need To Run Premium???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2006 | 04:25 AM
  #1  
LittleCon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, California
Do I REALLY Need To Run Premium???

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


why premium??
Old May 26, 2006 | 04:48 AM
  #2  
idsigloo's Avatar
Needs more Displacement.
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, Ky
Premium has a higher octane so it burns slower. The fc was made to run on 87 octane. If you've done any major mods to the car then it is recommended to run premium because of it's slower burn rate. The slower burn rate keeps the car from detonating.
Old May 26, 2006 | 04:51 AM
  #3  
LittleCon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, California
its bone stock, still need to run premium?
Old May 26, 2006 | 04:57 AM
  #4  
Jigsaw's Avatar
The Devil
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
As long as you are on bone-stock, no.
Old May 26, 2006 | 05:12 AM
  #5  
Wankel7's Avatar
Haven't we ALL heard this
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Uh, the first question is....

Turbo or not?
Old May 26, 2006 | 05:21 AM
  #6  
Turbo23's Avatar
Panda Bear
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 4
From: Lititz, PA
either NA or turbo, if your bone stock, 87 will work fine. However once you begin modding, premium will become a must.
Old May 26, 2006 | 05:23 AM
  #7  
Wankel7's Avatar
Haven't we ALL heard this
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
DOUBLE ..... your fun with two of my posts
Old May 26, 2006 | 08:52 AM
  #8  
Unseen24-7's Avatar
Card-carrying Rotorhead
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Quebec
I actually have the same question, but somebody told me that 87 in the USA is like 91 in Canada, does this make sense?
Old May 26, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #9  
SureShot's Avatar
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
I'm tuned for premium, but today it's a bargain!
I look at it this way:
At $1/gal, premium cost 20% more.
at $3/gal, it's only 7% more.
Old May 26, 2006 | 09:04 AM
  #10  
Goofy's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: USA
It's the difference between MON and RON gas ratings. US gas ratings are listed as about 4-5 points lower than (just about) anywhere else in the world.

So our pumps labeled 87 would be listed as 91 in Europe. And our pumps listed at 93 would be labeled 97 in Japan, etc. Someone can confirm whether Canada uses the US rating or the RON (IIRC) rating.
Old May 26, 2006 | 09:14 AM
  #11  
Juiceh's Avatar
Saiga-12 Power!
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,385
Likes: 2
From: N of Chicago
Originally Posted by SureShot
I'm tuned for premium, but today it's a bargain!
I look at it this way:
At $1/gal, premium cost 20% more.
at $3/gal, it's only 7% more.
Makes sense to me!
Old May 26, 2006 | 09:23 AM
  #12  
snowball's Avatar
I live in the lounge...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 0
From: lathrup, MI
Originally Posted by SureShot
I'm tuned for premium, but today it's a bargain!
I look at it this way:
At $1/gal, premium cost 20% more.
at $3/gal, it's only 7% more.
and on top of that 110(pump at a few stations around here) is only 4.05 a gallon right now
only 33% more to run race gas!
now thats a bargin
Old May 26, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #13  
SureShot's Avatar
Seduced by the DARK SIDE
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 2
From: Orange Park FL (near Jax)
I wonder if rocket fuel is now cheaper that gas?
Old May 26, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #14  
RockLobster's Avatar
Let's get silly...
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 10
From: Rosemount, MN
Probably. But I am guessing that running rocket fuel in any car, much less a turbocharged rotary is not recomended.
Old May 26, 2006 | 12:33 PM
  #15  
drugblock12a's Avatar
WON'T FORGET DAVE
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
From: Middle of nowhere
I talked to the guys who run fuels on base. Last week when gas prices were near all time highs. They said jet fuel was alot cheaper.
Old May 26, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #16  
Wankel7's Avatar
Haven't we ALL heard this
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,948
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by drugblock12a
I talked to the guys who run fuels on base. Last week when gas prices were near all time highs. They said jet fuel was alot cheaper.

Jet fuel prices vary.... (It's just kerosene with additives)

The airlines are prob buying it at $2.20 or so a gallon.

Go to your local airport it is prob $4+ a gallon.

On the bright side.... your car does not burn 450 gallons in the first hour of flight like the cargo plane I flies does :P

James
Old May 26, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #17  
LittleCon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, California
ok well im just gonna run 89 for safty's sake

its an 88 GXL (N/A)
Old May 26, 2006 | 03:13 PM
  #18  
speed_monkey's Avatar
affen
Tenured Member 15 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
lol you dont need anything more than 87 for n/a!
Old May 26, 2006 | 04:15 PM
  #19  
RexRyder's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 6
From: Tucson
I'm going to tune my car to to run 87 AND still get 450WHP
Old May 26, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #20  
Secondmessiah's Avatar
Rotary enthusiast
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by SureShot
I wonder if rocket fuel is now cheaper that gas?
rockets run on ethanol or hydrogen, so yes and no
Old May 26, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #21  
snowball's Avatar
I live in the lounge...
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,000
Likes: 0
From: lathrup, MI
Originally Posted by RexRyder
I'm going to tune my car to to run 87 AND still get 450WHP
with a p-port 20B?
Old May 26, 2006 | 06:44 PM
  #22  
mrtasty's Avatar
Junior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Florida
i was wondering, does running on premium give you a little more gas mileage,
and will i need to run on premium if i bridge port a s4 N/a?
Old May 26, 2006 | 09:04 PM
  #23  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
I have an N/A that put down 172rwhp, more than most, and all I run is 87. Anything more is a waste.
Old May 26, 2006 | 09:50 PM
  #24  
Icemark's Avatar
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 24
From: Rohnert Park CA
Do we have to have another thread on this??? The search function is found in the uer right hand corner of the page...

If LittleCon had searched he (or she) would have found that anything more than 87 octane on a stock FC motor actually is more likely to cause problems, and will actually result in less HP.

See the octane rating has absolutely nothing to do with BTU or power output. The only thing higher octane numbers do, is make it harder to pre-ignite. It makes the burn slower. Higher octane does not contain any additional power or performance unless the motor was designed or tuned to run on a higher octane (and even then the additional power is only a result of higher compression or boost along with computr processing).

In fact (more so on a non-turbo) you want the gas to ignite as easy as possible. Lower octane on a rotary with less than a 10:1 compression actually burns cleaner and faster than a higher octane.

So using higher octanes on a stock motor will result in increased deposits on the rotor faces(which could result in pre-mature engine failure), less power, and less money in your wallet.

So why would you waste the money and buy anything but 86 or 87 octane???

And finally, thread closed. Covered and proven countless times before.

Last edited by Icemark; May 26, 2006 at 09:54 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
C. Ludwig
Single Turbo RX-7's
49
Jan 30, 2019 06:31 AM
Rotospectre
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Mar 28, 2018 03:33 PM
The Shaolin
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
9
Sep 14, 2015 07:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.