2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Coolant hose under throttle body, to engine, S4TII

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #1  
Grip's Avatar
Thread Starter
.................
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
Coolant hose under throttle body, to engine, S4TII

Does this pain in the *** coolant line need to be there? Or can I cap it off at the engine?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #2  
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 6
From: Beaverton, OR
Its part of the Thermowax accelerated warm up system, it goes through the TB. You could cap both ends, or loop a line between or just replace the stupid little bastards and leave everything intact.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 08:07 PM
  #3  
FelixIsGod29X's Avatar
Manual Rack
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 1
From: Wanaque NJ
^^^You could do that but expect to hold the throttle a little bit while the engine is cold. to the OP, just replace the line. Ive done it once and its easy, im about to replace it again because last time it was replaced the part was used. Go with OEM through mazdatrix.com or some place similar.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 09:37 PM
  #4  
Grip's Avatar
Thread Starter
.................
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
my rtek 1.7 kills the AWS, do i still need that coolant line?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 10:41 PM
  #5  
jmabo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: socal
you don't need that line if your not using the warm up. Id just cap it off.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 11:20 PM
  #6  
Grip's Avatar
Thread Starter
.................
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
sweet. that will make things easier. that hose is a bitch.

anyone else have a say?
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 11:33 PM
  #7  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
AWS is not thermowax. The AWS removal function is for the 3K RPM startup. Thermowax keeps your idle speed at 1.5k and drops it to 750 RPM when warm. I'm not a fan of removing the thermowax personally. I kept mine during my engine build, and I'm out here in SoCal.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 11:40 PM
  #8  
Grip's Avatar
Thread Starter
.................
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
Good info. Thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2010 | 11:49 PM
  #9  
arghx's Avatar
rotorhead
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 16,205
Likes: 461
From: cold
It's annoying not to have fast idle system, but you can live without it (although idle is especially bad if you eliminate the BAC valve as well). The fast idle system holds the throttle plate open (same as putting your foot on the gas) and then slowly closes it to a normal position once the engine warms up. Once you get used to installing the hose it's not too bad to deal with.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 01:30 AM
  #10  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
You do NOT want to remove the thermowax. Think about it like this...

How often do you need to remove your UIM (and the corresponding 90* hose) ?
Now how often would you like your car to idle?

Having your car die at every stop light is annoying, and the colder it gets the longer it takes before it will idle (if it does at all).
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 01:34 AM
  #11  
RotaryEvolution's Avatar
Sharp Claws
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,107
Likes: 50
From: Central Florida
or you can get a S5 thermowax solenoid and the S5 90* hose. they are a TON easier to deal with.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 01:44 AM
  #12  
slpin's Avatar
7th Heaven
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 4
From: California
if you live in IL, you really should keep it on there....
it looks like he has a t2, so wouldnt that be a questionmark shaped hose instead of the L hose?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 11:05 AM
  #13  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
^ Just the opposite. NAs have that question mark shaped hose that has to clear the UIM, while TIIs have the little 90* hose. S4 & S5 TIIs alike.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #14  
therotaryrocket's Avatar
PIMP
Tenured Member 20 Years
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC
I removed my BAC valve and my thermowax on my Turbo II. I turned the throttle stop screw until the idle got to about 950 rpms warm, I live in NC and it's been pretty cold lately. My car will idle after about 30 seconds from a dead cold start. I have no problems with it dying on me as a result, but then again I don't have a stereo (yet), or A/C. My car is not a daily driver so I knew it wouldn't be a big deal to remove it, but now I would probably do it on a regular street car too. I felt like that coolant line was a biatch too and I was happy to cap that sucker!
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #15  
Grip's Avatar
Thread Starter
.................
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
I'll keep the hose. It's a 90 degree hose correct?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 06:51 PM
  #16  
Barnett87GXL's Avatar
< SPACE FOR RENT >
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 618
Likes: 9
From: Toronto
ya like one of the other posters said, how many times are you gonna be taking the UIM off?

I've had problems with that hose, it helps to just get a new piece of hose( much more flexible) and the screw type clamps, helped a lot for me at least.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 07:09 PM
  #17  
Nick_d_TII's Avatar
Rotary Freak
Tenured Member 20 Years
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 6
From: Beaverton, OR
Originally Posted by RotaryRocket88
AWS is not thermowax. The AWS removal function is for the 3K RPM startup. Thermowax keeps your idle speed at 1.5k and drops it to 750 RPM when warm. I'm not a fan of removing the thermowax personally. I kept mine during my engine build, and I'm out here in SoCal.
Ahh, you're right. Although it does accelerate warm up as it idles at 1.5k when cold.

I didn't say remove it...

You could cap both ends, or loop a line between or just replace the stupid little bastards and leave everything intact.

I removed mine, and yea, it doesn't idle when I first fire it up, but give it a few minutes and its fine.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #18  
RotaryRocket88's Avatar
Top Down, Boost Up
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,718
Likes: 6
From: San Diego, CA
^ Yeah, technically the thermowax does help warm the engine up , but that's not what the Rtek disables. That just nixes the air bypass solenoid (called AWS sometimes).

I was mainly replying to this:

Originally Posted by Grip
my rtek 1.7 kills the AWS, do i still need that coolant line?
I kept my thermowax, but I bypassed the BAC in the coolant loop. A hose directly from the water pump housing to the thermowax works.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 08:58 PM
  #19  
RX-7tII88's Avatar
Do Work
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
I was cursing at that hose today pulling my UIM. But, I do like having the thermo wax intact for start up idle, thats for sure. Especially with all other emission removed. I just have some napa tubing on there and I think its too small which makes it worse. I really need the stock hose...
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 09:25 PM
  #20  
Barnett87GXL's Avatar
< SPACE FOR RENT >
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 618
Likes: 9
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by RX-7tII88
I was cursing at that hose today pulling my UIM. But, I do like having the thermo wax intact for start up idle, thats for sure. Especially with all other emission removed. I just have some napa tubing on there and I think its too small which makes it worse. I really need the stock hose...
I found that the stock hose(or what ever was on there when I got the car) was too short and i went out and made a tube that was a little bit longer and that seemed to work much better.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 09:54 PM
  #21  
Grip's Avatar
Thread Starter
.................
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 3
From: Illinois
i am going to use a longer hose, it was a bitch getting the hose clamp off when i removed my UIM, so i cut the hose.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2010 | 11:30 PM
  #22  
barnett87rx7's Avatar
lite rotary = easy push
Tenured Member 10 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,385
Likes: 0
From: Whitby
that hose sucks a lot I am going to remove it when I put on my bigger turbo, the thermowax isnt a big deal on start up you just hold down the throttle for 45 secs instead of the car doing it it's self
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2010 | 04:10 AM
  #23  
jmabo205's Avatar
Senior Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: socal
i can just tell you that i don't have a bac, thermowax, and i capped off the hose and my car idles fine. I only have to hold the accelerator down for about 1 min when the engine is cold and then after that it idles fine.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2010 | 06:02 PM
  #24  
sharingan 19's Avatar
Rotary Revolutionary
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,881
Likes: 3
From: Jacksonville, Tampa & Tallahassee
My car used to idle after a min but after my BAC quit working, no such luck.

I think the thermowax is gone, so I've got another TB and BAC on the way.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trickster
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
25
Jul 1, 2023 04:40 PM
CaptainKRM
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
Aug 26, 2015 09:52 PM
Engine stand ready
New Member RX-7 Technical
3
Aug 14, 2015 10:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:18 PM.