2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.

Compression test #'s ?!!!!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #1  
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
1.3L piston eater
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, Canada
Compression test #'s ?!!!!?

hey guys.

Tryed searching and couldnt find anything.. i know im missing it because i found it here before, but looking for what compression numbers are good and what are bad. my engine has 147,000kms on orig. engine and it runs amazing with plenty of power thu out the whole band, but im curious as to what its compressions like so test time.. what are the numbers?

example

below 40 - needs rebuild

50-95 good

125 - new engine

you get the point..i hope
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 05:36 PM
  #2  
crazyasu's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Victoria
Originally Posted by TurboMazdaSpeed
hey guys.

Tryed searching and couldnt find anything.. i know im missing it because i found it here before, but looking for what compression numbers are good and what are bad. my engine has 147,000kms on orig. engine and it runs amazing with plenty of power thu out the whole band, but im curious as to what its compressions like so test time.. what are the numbers?

example

below 40 - needs rebuild

50-95 good

125 - new engine

you get the point..i hope

Mazda has set minimum compression pressure to be at 70psi. Good compression are readings anything above 100psi. Compression testing under 80psi is a sign of an engine requiring a rebuild soon. Compression should be even across all three rotor faces on both the front and rear rotors. It is more important to have all even compression numbers across the rotor faces versus one really high number on one face.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #3  
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
1.3L piston eater
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, Canada
hmm well it turned out well for how many k's i have on the engine and how much abuse its seen.... 85 on rear rotor and 90 on front. 147,000 and the engines never been rebuilt. LOL and its seen quite a few turbos on it thx for the info tho!
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #4  
crazyasu's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Victoria
no prob
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 10:21 PM
  #5  
gonzoatx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock TX
what about on a 3rd gen which i have 105psi front and 105 psi back?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 10:36 PM
  #6  
crazyasu's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Victoria
Originally Posted by gonzoatx
what about on a 3rd gen which i have 105psi front and 105 psi back?
I believe it's the same except the minimum is 60psi instead of 70psi
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 03:23 AM
  #7  
NotTTT's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: usa
Originally Posted by crazyasu
I believe it's the same except the minimum is 60psi instead of 70psi
Where did you come up with this ****?

The mazda specification for rotary compression has been minimum 85psi for all 2nd gens, correcting for cranking rpm and altitude. On the renesis/rx8 they raised this to 96psi.

Rotaries below 85psi will barely run and are a bitch to start hot, and rotaries in the 60s or 70's will no longer start at all without a roll start...and they won't idle and have zero low end power.

Please stop making things up.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 07:17 AM
  #8  
Omixeo's Avatar
'89 GTUs
Tenured Member 15 Years
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Arizona
I had a car with 60psi on both rotors and it started fine every time.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 10:02 AM
  #9  
gonzoatx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock TX
so is my engine good?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #10  
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
Have RX-7, will restore
Veteran: Army
Tenured Member: 20 Years
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 22,577
Likes: 1,273
From: Ohio
i would say that your engine is fairly worn. its still decent, yes, but the oil consumption may be higher(worn oil control seals) and gas mileage may be lower than that of an engine with better compression numbers and newer internal seals. you may find it difficult to start when the engine is hot or when the outside temps are high.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 11:32 AM
  #11  
crazyasu's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Victoria
Originally Posted by weezyfbaby
Where did you come up with this ****?

The mazda specification for rotary compression has been minimum 85psi for all 2nd gens, correcting for cranking rpm and altitude. On the renesis/rx8 they raised this to 96psi.

Rotaries below 85psi will barely run and are a bitch to start hot, and rotaries in the 60s or 70's will no longer start at all without a roll start...and they won't idle and have zero low end power.

Please stop making things up.

http://www.fc3spro.com/TECH/FAQ/compress.html
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #12  
farberio's Avatar
NASA-MW ST4
Tenured Member: 20 Years
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 3
From: Norcal, Bay Area
^thats funny because FSM says 85 PSI Minimum.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 12:29 PM
  #13  
NotTTT's Avatar
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: usa
This is from the s4 FSM, the s5 and FD manuals are identical.

Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #14  
well uhhh's Avatar
I wanna go fast
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: North Bend, WA
+1 I've always heard different things on the forums but every book that i have ever read was the same 85 psi. Then again, we don't always do exactly what the FSM says, and i am sure they put a "buffer" in their numbers. anything below 85 should be rebuilt. It will still run, but a rebuild before an apex failure is almost always cheaper and easier IMO.
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #15  
crazyasu's Avatar
Full Member
Tenured Member 05 Years
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Victoria
Originally Posted by weezyfbaby
Where did you come up with this ****?

The mazda specification for rotary compression has been minimum 85psi for all 2nd gens, correcting for cranking rpm and altitude. On the renesis/rx8 they raised this to 96psi.

Rotaries below 85psi will barely run and are a bitch to start hot, and rotaries in the 60s or 70's will no longer start at all without a roll start...and they won't idle and have zero low end power.

Please stop making things up.
So you've seen where I came up with this S@#$ and it's comes from a pretty reputable source so I wasn't making things up and sorry but your not allowed flaming until your post count reaches (10)
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2008 | 12:37 AM
  #16  
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
1.3L piston eater
Tenured Member 10 Years
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 514
Likes: 3
From: Vancouver, Canada
welll thats lame.. i did it when my engine was cold and w/o the pedal pressed at all... looks like ill be at it again.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
Sep 19, 2015 09:20 PM
BLK 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
Sep 9, 2015 10:56 AM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
Sep 8, 2015 05:36 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
Sep 5, 2015 08:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.