2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Compression test #'s ?!!!!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-08, 04:13 PM
  #1  
1.3L piston eater

Thread Starter
 
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Compression test #'s ?!!!!?

hey guys.

Tryed searching and couldnt find anything.. i know im missing it because i found it here before, but looking for what compression numbers are good and what are bad. my engine has 147,000kms on orig. engine and it runs amazing with plenty of power thu out the whole band, but im curious as to what its compressions like so test time.. what are the numbers?

example

below 40 - needs rebuild

50-95 good

125 - new engine

you get the point..i hope
Old 07-01-08, 05:36 PM
  #2  
Full Member

 
crazyasu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TurboMazdaSpeed
hey guys.

Tryed searching and couldnt find anything.. i know im missing it because i found it here before, but looking for what compression numbers are good and what are bad. my engine has 147,000kms on orig. engine and it runs amazing with plenty of power thu out the whole band, but im curious as to what its compressions like so test time.. what are the numbers?

example

below 40 - needs rebuild

50-95 good

125 - new engine

you get the point..i hope

Mazda has set minimum compression pressure to be at 70psi. Good compression are readings anything above 100psi. Compression testing under 80psi is a sign of an engine requiring a rebuild soon. Compression should be even across all three rotor faces on both the front and rear rotors. It is more important to have all even compression numbers across the rotor faces versus one really high number on one face.
Old 07-01-08, 05:39 PM
  #3  
1.3L piston eater

Thread Starter
 
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
hmm well it turned out well for how many k's i have on the engine and how much abuse its seen.... 85 on rear rotor and 90 on front. 147,000 and the engines never been rebuilt. LOL and its seen quite a few turbos on it thx for the info tho!
Old 07-01-08, 05:57 PM
  #4  
Full Member

 
crazyasu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no prob
Old 07-01-08, 10:21 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
gonzoatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Round Rock TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what about on a 3rd gen which i have 105psi front and 105 psi back?
Old 07-01-08, 10:36 PM
  #6  
Full Member

 
crazyasu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gonzoatx
what about on a 3rd gen which i have 105psi front and 105 psi back?
I believe it's the same except the minimum is 60psi instead of 70psi
Old 07-02-08, 03:23 AM
  #7  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
NotTTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: usa
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crazyasu
I believe it's the same except the minimum is 60psi instead of 70psi
Where did you come up with this ****?

The mazda specification for rotary compression has been minimum 85psi for all 2nd gens, correcting for cranking rpm and altitude. On the renesis/rx8 they raised this to 96psi.

Rotaries below 85psi will barely run and are a bitch to start hot, and rotaries in the 60s or 70's will no longer start at all without a roll start...and they won't idle and have zero low end power.

Please stop making things up.
Old 07-02-08, 07:17 AM
  #8  
'89 GTUs

iTrader: (1)
 
Omixeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a car with 60psi on both rotors and it started fine every time.
Old 07-02-08, 10:02 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
gonzoatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Round Rock TX
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so is my engine good?
Old 07-02-08, 10:10 AM
  #10  
Have RX-7, will restore


iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,713
Received 1,053 Likes on 892 Posts
i would say that your engine is fairly worn. its still decent, yes, but the oil consumption may be higher(worn oil control seals) and gas mileage may be lower than that of an engine with better compression numbers and newer internal seals. you may find it difficult to start when the engine is hot or when the outside temps are high.
Old 07-02-08, 11:32 AM
  #11  
Full Member

 
crazyasu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by weezyfbaby
Where did you come up with this ****?

The mazda specification for rotary compression has been minimum 85psi for all 2nd gens, correcting for cranking rpm and altitude. On the renesis/rx8 they raised this to 96psi.

Rotaries below 85psi will barely run and are a bitch to start hot, and rotaries in the 60s or 70's will no longer start at all without a roll start...and they won't idle and have zero low end power.

Please stop making things up.

http://www.fc3spro.com/TECH/FAQ/compress.html
Old 07-02-08, 11:34 AM
  #12  
NASA-MW ST4

iTrader: (7)
 
farberio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Norcal, Bay Area
Posts: 3,800
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^thats funny because FSM says 85 PSI Minimum.
Old 07-02-08, 12:29 PM
  #13  
Banned. I got OWNED!!!
 
NotTTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: usa
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is from the s4 FSM, the s5 and FD manuals are identical.

Old 07-02-08, 12:49 PM
  #14  
I wanna go fast

 
well uhhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North Bend, WA
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
+1 I've always heard different things on the forums but every book that i have ever read was the same 85 psi. Then again, we don't always do exactly what the FSM says, and i am sure they put a "buffer" in their numbers. anything below 85 should be rebuilt. It will still run, but a rebuild before an apex failure is almost always cheaper and easier IMO.
Old 07-02-08, 01:19 PM
  #15  
Full Member

 
crazyasu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by weezyfbaby
Where did you come up with this ****?

The mazda specification for rotary compression has been minimum 85psi for all 2nd gens, correcting for cranking rpm and altitude. On the renesis/rx8 they raised this to 96psi.

Rotaries below 85psi will barely run and are a bitch to start hot, and rotaries in the 60s or 70's will no longer start at all without a roll start...and they won't idle and have zero low end power.

Please stop making things up.
So you've seen where I came up with this S@#$ and it's comes from a pretty reputable source so I wasn't making things up and sorry but your not allowed flaming until your post count reaches (10)
Old 07-04-08, 12:37 AM
  #16  
1.3L piston eater

Thread Starter
 
TurboMazdaSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
welll thats lame.. i did it when my engine was cold and w/o the pedal pressed at all... looks like ill be at it again.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZacMan
Build Threads
4
09-19-15 09:20 PM
Blk 93
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
11
09-09-15 10:56 AM
SCinfidel
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
09-08-15 05:36 PM
ZaqAtaq
New Member RX-7 Technical
2
09-05-15 08:57 PM



Quick Reply: Compression test #'s ?!!!!?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 AM.