2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

cheep slotted & cross drilled rotors!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-02, 07:47 PM
  #1  
Full Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: houston, tx
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cheep slotted & cross drilled rotors!!

I found a killer hook up on rotors $240 buys a full 4 piece set front and back.Go to WWW.PERRY@ MASTERGRADE.NET
Old 11-21-02, 07:56 PM
  #2  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

link doesn't work
Old 11-21-02, 08:04 PM
  #3  
Going for the win

iTrader: (6)
 
Dvst8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 949
Received 21 Likes on 7 Posts
um....is it an email or a web link? haha
Old 11-21-02, 08:05 PM
  #4  
OC_
I'm bastardizing my car!

 
OC_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Naperville, IL.
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
iv read so much stuff that says x-drilled rotors does nothing but shorten the life of the rotor... unless you want good looks...
Old 11-21-02, 08:16 PM
  #5  
Super Raterhater

iTrader: (6)
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NY, MA, MI, OR, TX, and now LA or AZ!
Posts: 10,624
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't understand there benefits, don't you want MORE friction, thus more surface area for brakes, why make it less? I don't quite understand to be honest.
Old 11-21-02, 08:18 PM
  #6  
White Comet

 
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orange County
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Dvst8
um....is it an email or a web link? haha
LOL
Old 11-21-02, 08:30 PM
  #7  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Irvine, California
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
the reason you wait it is for heat dissapation and also deglazing
Old 11-21-02, 08:32 PM
  #8  
Daily Domestic Killer

 
BlackRx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: San Antonio, Tx, USA
Posts: 2,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the x drilling was about heat disapation, the less heat the better braking right?
Old 11-21-02, 08:57 PM
  #9  
Rotary Enthusiast

 
ponykiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: KC
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not all brakes are better at lower temps. Some are designed for high temp operation, while others are for low temp operation. Either way, there can be too much heat, so you must still keep them cool. Too low a temp, and the brakes are also not efficient, so you must keep them in the operating temp range.
Old 11-21-02, 09:02 PM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
CarmonColvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Helena, Al
Posts: 446
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cross drilled rotors to many things.

1. They weigh less because there is less material in them. It might sound marginal but it could be as much as 3 lbs per rotor that is a significant amount if you are worried about unsprung weight (that matters in a suspension setup when determining the proper spring rate). (BTW: in IT racing it is popular to take brand new rotors and have them turned down to their minimum width to shave pounds of material off of them. This is not safe for daily driving but is safe if you are inspecting them after each race and replacing them once or twice a season.)

2. They disipate heat better because there is more surface area for air to pass over/through them.

3. They give a place for the brake pads to gas out to. Some break pads give off a gas when hot and under breaking. On a solid rotor the pads can actually float on a pocket of gas and not actually touch the rotors (on in extreme heat and breaking will this happen). Slotted rotors will also keep this from happening.

4. They keep the pads from sliding on break dust. Some pads at the right temperature will dust so bad it is like having graphite between the pads and rotors (cheap pads will do this).

On the down side they are prone to cracking between the holes through heavy heat cycles. Some of the HIGH DOLLAR rotors have the holes cast into them instead of drilled after the rotors are cast. These are less likely to crack but are hella expensive and probably not even available for our cars.

I think F1 used to use rotors that had the holes cast into them but now I think all teams use solid carbon fiber rotors. I can only imagine they cost in the thousands of dollars EACH.
Old 11-21-02, 09:04 PM
  #11  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mass
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's what I heard

Cross drilling was originally done to allow degassing. Old break pads would release gasses, reducing their effieintcy when hot, the cross drilling was to give those gasses somewhere to go. New break pads don't have that problem, so all the holes do is look good, and reduce the amount of rotor mass, which leads to higher temps, and shorter rotor life.

Slotting rotors does seem to help somewhat, keeping the pads from wearing unevenly, and helps with glazing problems. But they still probably reduce pad life, especially if the slots are too deep.

I plan on going with solid rotors, possible cryo treated. Don't know how much it costs yet.
Old 11-22-02, 12:59 AM
  #12  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
http://fc3s-pro.com/TECH/MODS/BRAKES/rotors.htm

Heat dissipation due to more surface area is bullshit.&nbsp Removing metal decreases the rotor's ability as a heat sink.&nbsp If you surpass the heat capacity of the rotor, the heat goes ELSEWHERE (i.e. pads, calipers, etc.).

The ONLY reason to drill them is unsprung weight.&nbsp 99.44% of the people in here can't tell the difference between drill or non-drilled rotors on the track - me included.

Bottom line, cross-drilling is a waste of time and a waste of money.&nbsp It should not be used on a street car, period.

The full Grassroots Motorsports write-up is shown on the MR-2 page with a link included on the above URL on my webpage.



-Ted
Old 11-22-02, 01:07 AM
  #13  
White Comet

 
Ni5mo180SX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orange County
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by RETed
http://fc3s-pro.com/TECH/MODS/BRAKES/rotors.htm

Heat dissipation due to more surface area is bullshit.&nbsp Removing metal decreases the rotor's ability as a heat sink.&nbsp If you surpass the heat capacity of the rotor, the heat goes ELSEWHERE (i.e. pads, calipers, etc.).

Why is heat dissipation due to more surface area bs?
Old 11-22-02, 01:16 AM
  #14  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally posted by Ni5mo180SX
Why is heat dissipation due to more surface area bs?
I've seen arguments along the same lines.&nbsp The heat capacity of the rotor is a lot more important that the increased surface area.&nbsp Therefore, the increased surface area is moot, if you're decreasing heat capacity.&nbsp Ask any of the race car engineers why they do or do not run cross-drilled rotors, and #1 reason "for" is reduced weight - NONE of them bring up the point of increased surface area for increased cooling.

If you study how most race cars are designed for brake cooling, you'll notice that the airflow is ducted into the CENTER of the hub.&nbsp The airflow hits the backside of the rotor/hub and the airflow starts to move radially (due to the rotating "fins") on the vented rotor.&nbsp The brake ducting is thus flowing from the inside radially in these brake cooling systems.&nbsp They really do NOT blow through the brake rotors perpendicularly; think about it - the rotor is spinning at a very high rate, and you're trying to force air through them???

A race car standing hard on the brakes can turn the rotors from ambient to over 1000F in a matter of seconds.&nbsp Heat capacity is a better thing at this point that increase surface area...



-Ted
Old 11-22-02, 01:40 AM
  #15  
Rotor Head

 
DC350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about on bikes? Just for looks?

how about slotted rotors?!
Old 11-22-02, 01:44 AM
  #16  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
I can't comment on bikes - I don't have direct experience with them myself.

The full GRM article is posted.&nbsp Go argue with them...


-Ted
Old 11-22-02, 03:40 AM
  #17  
Senior Member

 
Funklord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Naha-City, Okinawa, JP
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
according to that website, it looks like they're $400 and for an s2000? is that right?
Old 11-22-02, 09:28 AM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
CarmonColvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Helena, Al
Posts: 446
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by RETed

Heat dissipation due to more surface area is bullshit.&nbsp Removing metal decreases the rotor's ability as a heat sink.&nbsp If you surpass the heat capacity of the rotor, the heat goes ELSEWHERE (i.e. pads, calipers, etc.).
After more reading I have to agree so ignore "2. They disipate heat better because there is more surface area for air to pass over/through them. " in my last post.

I have read it both ways now but the smaller heat capacity had more research and proof behind it.

Just goes to show you "Don't belive everything you read on here"..

BTW: My car has slotted rotors all the way around.

Thanks Ted.
Old 11-22-02, 12:39 PM
  #19  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Sorry if I sounded a bit agitated back there.&nbsp I've got tons of things going on, and it seems like I'm being bombarded from almost every side of my life - I don't want to get into a detailed description right now.

I'm a bit tired of arguing the increased-surface-area theory.&nbsp GRM did a great write-up on the whole mess, and their audience would be more appropriate to the readership in here.

Thanks for being more cordial about the whole thread.


-Ted
Old 11-22-02, 01:02 PM
  #20  
Senior Member

 
eljefe62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now what about slotted?
I was under the impression that slots would transfer heat out to the edges of the rotor, thus making heat dissipation easier.
Old 11-22-02, 02:47 PM
  #21  
Lives on the Forum

 
RETed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: n
Posts: 26,664
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally posted by eljefe62
Now what about slotted?
I was under the impression that slots would transfer heat out to the edges of the rotor, thus making heat dissipation easier.
No, the slots are there to "wipe" the brake pads to keep them "clean".&nbsp Slots have nothing to do with more cooling - same situation with the cross drilled.


-Ted
Old 11-22-02, 03:18 PM
  #22  
Full Member

 
junior-coyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard that at first (50s 60s?) brake rotors were drilled primarily for outgasing (venting gas generated by hot brake pads.) Newer brake pads gas much less, so you don't really need the holes. But, they were originally trick, and some people still like them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jeff20B
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
73
09-16-18 07:16 PM



Quick Reply: cheep slotted & cross drilled rotors!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.