Molotovman

iTrader: (49)

Carfax says my car is a turbo II when it's really not. I even have the original dealership paper for my car that says its an 87 base model. I checked the VIN like 3 times and it is the right one. It's kinda funny, ahs this happened to anyone else? Oh yeah, I havent looked at the car VIN yet, just the one on the dealership papers.

Rxmfn7

iTrader: (4)

Its quite common that CarFax does that to FCs from what I hear...

fc3seeker

wow that's weird...

Turbonut

iTrader: (1)

Certainly hope the vin on the car agrees with the paper work!

harjms

well i can prove that their wrong too...It says the one i looked at was a GXL. Well this one doesnt have lsd, AAS, 4 lug phone dials, etc...it was a 86 ...and also it was wrecked one thing carfax didnt say about it

Digi7ech

iTrader: (1)

Just because it was wrecked doesn't mean it will show up.

My friend put his camaro around a light pole and took the front from another camaro off and welded it on.
The title is still perfect on it too.

NCGNETO90

iTrader: (3)

WOW! That is way weird! I have never heard of that before.

RETed

Doe your VIN look like this?
JM1FC33*2*...
CarFAX will see the "2" and automatically think it's a turbo, since all US VIN's are coded for that.
Was this a Canadian vehicle?  The Canadian FC's do not strictly adhere to this standard.


-Ted

Molotovman

iTrader: (49)

Nope, no 2 there. The car is strictly US, bought in Kentucky. VIN is JM1FC3314H0518325. It's really weird. It's neat though.

RETed

Wow, that is weird...


-Ted

walken

iTrader: (6)

my 88se carfax listed at t2

Rx-7Addict

iTrader: (2)

that is very weird.

Usually all Turbos are JM1FC332 and all NAs are JM1FC331 I believe