2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992) 1986-1992 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections.
Sponsored by:

Best Filter Thread???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-04, 06:18 PM
  #1  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
3RotorRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best Filter Thread???

Does anyone have the link to where they tested all the intake filters???
Old 08-12-04, 07:49 PM
  #2  
on the road to insanity

iTrader: (7)
 
seveninphilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Bristol, PA
Posts: 586
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/2/
Old 08-12-04, 08:35 PM
  #3  
Wait................What?

 
poor_red_neck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh/Cary, NC - USA
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow.

The HKS filter REALLY sucks.
Old 08-12-04, 08:54 PM
  #4  
Rotary engine victory

iTrader: (2)
 
KingCobraV9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newburgh, IN
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
o ya i red that the apexi one kicked everyones ***
Old 08-12-04, 09:16 PM
  #5  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
3RotorRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by seveninphilly
Thank you sir
Old 08-12-04, 09:22 PM
  #6  
Full Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: salisbury nc
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know what my filter will be from now on....
Old 08-12-04, 09:39 PM
  #7  
rawr

iTrader: (2)
 
Agent_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Silver City, NM
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ agreed, im buying an apex'i unit asap
Old 08-12-04, 09:40 PM
  #8  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by poor_red_neck
Wow.

The HKS filter REALLY sucks.
Not necessarily. That "test" was hardly performed within SAE standards, which is not surprising for an informercial.
Old 08-12-04, 09:40 PM
  #9  
Certified User

 
Imischeifin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Right near da beach, boiiy.
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's Monster.

Thanks for the link, and thanks for the Q
Old 08-13-04, 01:51 AM
  #10  
Rotary Freak

Thread Starter
 
3RotorRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Not necessarily. That "test" was hardly performed within SAE standards, which is not surprising for an informercial.
Yeah good point but it's accurate enough.

BTW ppl I have the Apexi Power Intake on my fc3s.

I can actually hear my turbo spoolin now.Easy to install just need 2 hose clamps.
Old 08-14-04, 07:17 PM
  #11  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by 4RotorRocket
but it's accurate enough.
Those of us with a small sense of professionalism and college degrees in science or engineering generally do not agree with that statement.
Old 08-14-04, 07:29 PM
  #12  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Not necessarily. That "test" was hardly performed within SAE standards, which is not surprising for an informercial.
While I agree to some point, (they probably should have used measured amounts of fine siilcates instead, and then measured the before and after amounts of the silicates), I also believe the test to be accurate enough to make an semi informed purchase from as it backs what real world experience I have seen.
Old 08-14-04, 08:31 PM
  #13  
Rotorhead

 
Evil Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
Posts: 9,136
Likes: 0
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
While I agree to some point, (they probably should have used measured amounts of fine siilcates instead, and then measured the before and after amounts of the silicates), I also believe the test to be accurate enough to make an semi informed purchase from as it backs what real world experience I have seen.
Scientifically, that test is totally invalid because the media was not homogenous. Also, the media flow rate and pressure differential were not monitored. Therefore, it is possible, if not probable, that some filters received finer media, more media, or otherwise different media than others. I think that most people would also consider infomercials suspect because the producers are biased.

If you have real world experience testing filters in accordance with SAE J726, then please post the results because I am getting pretty tired of seeing this silly web link used for technical purposes.
Old 08-14-04, 09:41 PM
  #14  
Need an E6x

 
marlaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil Aviator
Scientifically, that test is totally invalid because the media was not homogenous. Also, the media flow rate and pressure differential were not monitored. Therefore, it is possible, if not probable, that some filters received finer media, more media, or otherwise different media than others. I think that most people would also consider infomercials suspect because the producers are biased.

If you have real world experience testing filters in accordance with SAE J726, then please post the results because I am getting pretty tired of seeing this silly web link used for technical purposes.
Smart people make me want to go to Wyotech more everyday. i think i'll head there next fall after i get my 7 paid off. anybody have any expirence out there or good stories for me?

thanx,
Matt
Old 08-14-04, 09:48 PM
  #15  
Eats, Sleeps, Dreams Rotary

iTrader: (1)
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evil, your points are true, but essentially they took a pile of dirt and put in through the filters. The standard deviation in the quanity smaller particles that could be trapped by the second filter used in their test material might vary by lets say 100%. As for the dirt flow rate differences, I can't honestly see it varying all that much. To be ridiculous lets again say 100%. Take a look at those pictures, do you see a 200% difference between the Apexi and HKS? Clearly it's much more than that. If you want to argue between the Apexi and K&N because the test is inaccurate fine, but broad conclusions like "the Apexi filter pulls out more dirt than the HKS" are valid because the test appears to be accurate enough as the uncertainties are not nearly as great as the observed differences.
Old 08-14-04, 10:44 PM
  #16  
rawr

iTrader: (2)
 
Agent_D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Silver City, NM
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i agree with snrub, although i dont know the spec's of an SAE test on the filters, the basic idea seems to be relevant, air filters are there to do just that, filter your air so dirt cant get in there, so the basic idea on putting dirt through with a vacuum cleaner seems like it would work decently, and give a brief idea of what air filters do what. as an overall decision, i would go with this test to sway my buying options, but then again if i knew all that was tested in an SAE test, it may be different.
Old 08-14-04, 11:45 PM
  #17  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Fritz_X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd love to see multiple sources to back this study up so far to me it looks like a bunch of people from Apexi rubbed dirt into the competitions filters and took pictures claiming to be an independent group. When you show a study it is a little more convincing to use numbers, and photograph the test procedure. C'mon if that was a Science Fair project that kid would get an F. Excellent, Poor, Good....

"Umm Jimmy what procedure did you use.?"

"Umm well,....first I took a big kickback from......"

Without another source confirming these results and without actual numbers this test is pure ****. You have no idea in what manner the testing procedure was conveyed and you don't even know what company backed the actual test.

--Fritz
Old 08-14-04, 11:59 PM
  #18  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz_X
I'd love to see multiple sources to back this study up so far to me it looks like a bunch of people from Apexi rubbed dirt into the competitions filters and took pictures claiming to be an independent group. When you show a study it is a little more convincing to use numbers, and photograph the test procedure. C'mon if that was a Science Fair project that kid would get an F. Excellent, Poor, Good....

"Umm Jimmy what procedure did you use.?"

"Umm well,....first I took a big kickback from......"

Without another source confirming these results and without actual numbers this test is pure ****. You have no idea in what manner the testing procedure was conveyed and you don't even know what company backed the actual test.

--Fritz
tell you what.. if someone wants to send me the 4 filters I will test them with a nice scientific method and verifiable and duplicatable results, and post them here. I have access to clean room test equippment that will show exactly how many particles and of what size make it through each filter.

But I personally think that my tests will show the exactly same results...
Old 08-15-04, 12:03 AM
  #19  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Fritz_X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Really Mark? You really think that the quality of the Apexi is that much more than the HKS? Interesting, do you just mean in terms of filtration or also in terms of airflow?

--Fritz
Old 08-15-04, 12:07 AM
  #20  
Full Member

 
chumma7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newark, NJ
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unless you have a standalone ems, i think the only thing that really matters in this circumstance is filteration.
Our stock afm's are just so restrictive that little variations in airflow between these brands of filters doesnt really matter... just my intuitive opinion.
Old 08-15-04, 12:21 AM
  #21  
Former Moderator. RIP Icemark.
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 25,896
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by Fritz_X
Really Mark? You really think that the quality of the Apexi is that much more than the HKS? Interesting, do you just mean in terms of filtration or also in terms of airflow?

--Fritz
I mean exactly in terms of both...

I personally have seen the HKS fail in 3 different cars. All directly related to dirt in the filters. When I mean fail, they implode, dumping foam into the intake, or deforming enough to allow dirt into the intake. the first two I could say isolated examples... but the third that failed the same way suggests that these filters are not worth anything if dirty. To top it off the amount of fne dust in the intake tubing on these vehicles suggests that they failed to filter out dirt that they should have.

Now I have never used the apexi (costs too much over the K&N) and just based on my understanding of filters, I have not used stainless steel mesh filters, but I have never seen the dust in the intakes (or a filter that deformed) on any OEM or K&N filter use.

But as Ted points out most of the time the dust and dirt is significantly less than an issue, and I must add that ever single case that I have seen the HKS fail was in a vehicle used off-roading or in track use, but generally what problems that happen on the track and/or off roading will eventually show in street driven vehicles as well.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gxl90rx7
Haltech Forum
4
09-14-15 03:09 PM
Steven_McKinley
General Rotary Tech Support
12
09-05-15 10:48 AM
High_Carb_Diet
Power FC Forum
1
09-05-15 09:07 AM
SakeBomb Garage
SakeBomb Garage
0
09-04-15 05:20 PM
SakeBomb Garage
Vendor Classifieds
0
09-04-15 05:19 PM



Quick Reply: Best Filter Thread???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.